DE MORTUIS
NIL NISI
BONA:

BY
SPICER & PEGLER

ILLUSTRATED BY
E. T. REED

PREFACE.

No one can say that our Motives are unworthy, for our object is to instruct. But there are some who may object to our Methods, and it is to such that we offer, not an apology, but an explanation.

A very large section of the Public cling to the belief that Law must be as dry as Dust, and Accounting as tedious as the Treadmill.

The truth is, it is not the Practice of Law or of Accounting that is uninteresting, but rather is it the Theory which is often rendered so by Teachers whom Providence never ordained to teach.

If, therefore, the employment of unorthodox methods helps to interest the Student in his subject, and to stimulate him to further effort, any apology would be out of place.

60, Watling Street,
  London, E.C.
    January, 1914.

Foreword.
By D. F. de l'Hoste Ranking, M.A., LL.D.

De mortuo illo quid dicam? "Nilnisi bonum" ut aiunt.

Sed quid si nil boni fecit? De bonis licet loqui.

At si nulla bona reliquit? De eo tacere decet: si neque bonum fecit nec bona acquisivit nil valet.

Sed si bona reliquit in sermonem hominum semper venit; vitia operta sunt; pecuniam fecit, illa quidem "non olet." Quem heredem instituit? Extraneis haec omnia livori proxima videntur. Te autem si tu aut cognatione aut affinitate propinquus exspectatio tenet. An mea interest? Si sic habet, quanti? Suave est ex magno tollere acervo; ejus pecunia quid non facere possim?

Siste, amice; aliquantulum cogita; supersunt multi cognati; fieri potest ut aut cum aliis bona partire debeas, aut exheredatus sis.

Gerrae! Sine dubio testamentum fecit: et cum ratione constat me alicuius rei legatarium esse. Nemo enim magis eum fovit; alii omnes cognati asseclae; solus eum amavi.

Insipiens, inter os et offam multa intervenire possunt. Audi de gente Fulvia fabellam: de multis mutato nomine narratur.

(In scena est coenatio Georgii Fusci, argentariorum interpretis. Fuscus, bene coenatus, alterum cyathum Falerni sorbillat. Accurrit uxor, commota; in manu litteras resignatas tenet).

U. Georgi!

F. Quid tibi nunc est? Num quid novi est?

U. Amita mea Maria decessit!

F. Bene! nunquam postea illud vile Sabinum necesse erit obsorbere: magnum est solatium.

U. At tu Georgi semper id laudasti!

F. Et tu simul filiaeque semper miratae estis Persicam illam detestabilem et psittacum dissonum, et laudibus extulistis: pretium fuit vetulae placere.

U. Esto: illa vero suavia erant. At hic mihi litterae a cognitore ejus Semaureo allatae: dicit se hodie vesperi te conventurum.

F. Demiror si testamentum fecit! Sin minus omnia ad te perveniunt, tu heres ex asse; cognati alii desunt.

U. Est quidem mariti nepos iste.

F. Nullus: tu sola heres: si intestata omnia ad te.

U. Tabulas vere fecit: cognitor scribit se te conventurum quia testamentum ad rem tuam maxime pertinet.

F. Mihi crede igitur! Aliquid magni tibi legavit: haud verisimile illam quidquam juveni Albo legasse: nunquam iliam observavit; homo nil est nisi pictor ignotus aut aliquid simile: uxorem quoque duxit quamdam inopem, et eis saepe amita tua subvenire debuit.

U. Fores pulsantur: advenit cognitor!

F. Dic famulae ut alteram cyathum ponat.

(Ingreditur Dominus Semaureus.)

Quid agis vir doctissime? Mea uxor dixit te venturum; nonne ob testamentum amitae ejus?

S. Sic res habet, Fusce; venio ad te quod hoc res tua maxime refert; et scio te onus suscepturum.

F. An sic habet? Vetulae illi multa bona provenere ut opinor.

S. Permulta: super haec te consulendum putavi. Hic mecum tabulas attuli ut eas inspicias.

F. Bene est; Dignissima erat; cui semper plurimum tribui. Falerni sume cyathum.

S. Benigne dicis; dimidium: bona venia uxoris tuae est mihi in animo summas testamenti reddere; ad illam quoque pertinet. (Testamenta allata resignat.)

Post nonnulla famulis legata ita instituit:

F. (In malam rem.)

S. "Quod ad ceteras possessiones Georgius Fuscus heres esto ex asse: (subridet Fuscus et uxori in aurem susurrat "ita ut dixi.")

S. (Conversa tabula) "et rogo eum ut cum primum potuerit haereditatem adire, omnibus et fundis et mobilibus venditis, pecunias in cautionibus publica auctoritate factis collocet et fructus reddat nepoti mariti mei Jacobo Albo et uxori suae in aetatem aut utri eorum vita superarit: eis mortuis ut inter liberos eorum caput dividat: aut liberis sine prole defunctis caput reddat ad sodalitatem Anthropophagis Africanis informandis et nutriendis institutam: praemio sint fiduciario viginti in annum librae."

F. Anus odiosa et malefica! At enitar ut testamentum rescindatur; inofficiosi testamenti querelam instituam! Delira fuit!

S. Immo mentis omnino compos fuit, Improbe: sic summa fide clamabo et testabor. Verba tua pro tempore et re indecora. Tui piget me: evado.

F. Maria!

U. Georgi!

Uterque. Exsecrabilis Illa!

(Aulaeum tollitur.)

Charles Augustus Algernon de Jones "... he gave Five Thousand Pounds to London's Home for Lost and Straying Hounds."

PROBLEM No. 1.

PROBLEM No. 2.

And when Joseph was dead his son Benjamin took unto himself a Wife and they had issue, two Boys and one Girl.

Now the elder of these two Sons was comely to gaze upon and when he was yet two years from Man's Estate his Father said unto him, "My Son, your Father's Brother is old and nearing death. Take heed, therefore, lest his wealth be scattered amongst the Gentiles." And the Son answered, "Fear not, my Father, from henceforth I will be unto my Father's Brother as a Son."

But after Seven Days had passed away the Uncle died and all his Flocks and Herds were left to his Brother Benjamin's Children. And on the Seventh Day after the Brother's death, the Woman, whom Benjamin had taken to wife, gave birth to Twin Children, and after Seven more Days had passed, the Male Child sickened and died. And Benjamin wept for his Son and looked not upon the Child that lived, and refused all meat, so that he weakened, and after Seven more Days he was buried in the Tomb of his Fathers (near Shepherd's Bush).

N.B.—There were fortunately no further deaths in Benjamin's family, and the Uncle's Legacy to his "Brother's Children," which was valued for Probate at £12,000, was duly divided between them.

How much did each receive?

PROBLEM No. 3.

Sir Hazel Knut, Bart., died, and the whole of his Estate, after the payment of Estate Duty, Debts, and all expenses, amounted to exactly £15,000.

He bequeathed the following Legacies, all free of Duty except the Settled Property.

And £50 each to the following:

The Residue of the Estate was left absolutely to Robert.

Show how much Sir Robert Knut inherited.

The Racehorse, "Fleetfoot." By "Footrest" out of "Fleet Rabbit." Aged 14.

PROBLEM No. 4.

Mr. Mordecai Moribund was a pessimist during life and died a violent death. His facial appearance was much disfigured by a sad squint, and this affliction to his eyes contributed in no small degree to the tragedy which at once deprived Mrs. Moribund of a husband and a son. The son, a bright youth of twenty summers, had been sent down from Oxford University by the authorities rather as a warning to others than for any great offence which he had committed. Nevertheless, the disgrace was keenly felt by his mother, and it was for this reason that Mr. Moribund decided to take him for a trip to India, until time had healed the wound.

Arrived in India, Mr. Moribund promised his son, Morton, to arrange for a tiger shooting expedition. This fatal promise caused all the trouble, for Mr. Moribund, owing to his visual defects, thought he observed a tiger approaching from the west and forthwith discharged his rifle. The bullet missed the tiger and passed through the head of the unfortunate Morton, who was thereby killed on the spot. Mr. Moribund, horrified by the accident, moved his position and slid from the back of the elephant right into the jaws of the infuriated animal. Assistance was rendered immediately, and Mr. Moribund was rescued from his unfortunate position, but not before he had sustained injuries from which he succumbed four days subsequently.

Mr. Moribund, by his will, left everything of which he was possessed to his widow absolutely. This property, after deducting debts, amounted to £137,500, but an examination of his affairs disclosed the fact that two years previously he had conveyed as an absolute gift to his son, Morton, the sum of £100,000. This money had been invested by Morton in Bearer Bonds of the Royal Japanese Steamship Company at an average price of £80%, but on the date of Morton's death these Bonds stood at £120%. Morton, by will, had left his entire fortune to a Miss Flossie Teazle, an actress whom he had met at Oxford.

The Death of Mr. Mordecai Moribund.

Show what duties were payable to the State as a direct consequence of the Tragedy.

Note.—The following epitaph, shamelessly copied from one in Malmesbury Abbey, was inscribed on Mr. Moribund's Tomb:—

PROBLEM No. 5.

It is a strange circumstance that little men with red hair usually have large families. At any rate Septimus Hawkins had red hair and twelve children, of whom eleven were living, but strangest of all he died intestate worth £122,600 subject to the payment of Estate Duty, and of which the Real property was valued at £36,000.

"Mrs. Hawkins had been very beautiful in her younger days."

Mrs. Hawkins had been very beautiful in her younger days, but time and children had robbed her of her rosy cheeks; and realising that widow's weeds did not become her, she withdrew shortly after the funeral to the seclusion of a country life, where she spent her time ministering to the sick, and looking after her late daughter Pearl's two small children. The names of her children in chronological order were as follows:—

How should the property of the late Septimus Hawkins be distributed, and how much did the respective beneficiaries receive?

PROBLEM No. 6.

Very few men can state with any degree of accuracy how long they will live, but Nathaniel Hibbert told his Wife he would die at 8 o'clock in the morning of Tuesday, the 22nd April, 1913, and he did die at that very time on that very day. He was standing on some scaffolding when a platform gave way under his very feet, and he broke his spinal cord. In other words he was hanged. His Solicitor urged him to make a Will and the prison Chaplain added his earnest entreaties, but Mr. Hibbert turned a deaf ear to all such suggestions. Even the sight of his Wife and only child did not affect his determination, and he died intestate.

What happened to the £1,200 of which he died possessed?

"Mr. Chicory loved his wife almost as much as Mrs. Chicory loved her husband."

PROBLEM No. 7.

Mr. Chicory loved his wife almost as much as Mrs. Chicory loved her husband. They had lived together for nearly forty years, and every Saturday morning throughout that long time Mr. Chicory had faithfully handed over to his wife his entire earnings, which were not much, and deducted only 5s. per week, which served as pocket money for Mr. Chicory, and enabled him to provide coals during the winter months, collection money at church, oil for the lamps, and sundry presents from time to time to his children, to say nothing of the Lame Crossing Sweeper.

Each week a small sum was deposited in the Post Office Savings Bank, and when Mr. Chicory died, not only had he to the credit of this account a balance of £108 0s. 10d., but his Cottage, which was valued at £90, was his own Freehold Property. He had made a Will and paid the Solicitor 10s. 6d. for drawing it up, and nobody could have read what he said about his old wife, to whom he left everything, without feeling a lump in the throat.

On the day of his funeral not one blind was undrawn in all the Cottages round about, and Mr. Michaelmas, the Carriage Builder, sent a landau specially for Mrs. Chicory. At least one hundred people went to the Church, where the good old Vicar read the Service, and the Lame Crossing Sweeper painted his broom-handle black.

Mrs. Chicory, some weeks later, paid the Solicitor another 10s. 6d., as a fee, and asked him to do the rest.

What did he do?

PROBLEM No. 8.

Men who are mean during life and who would grudge a present of 5s. to the postman at Christmas, or who would spend a whole day in another man's motor car and fail to tip the Chauffeur at the end of the journey, often prove very generous with their money when they die and can no longer enjoy the satisfaction of possession, which during lifetime they cherished so dearly.

Such creatures usually bequeath their property to Charitable Institutions at the expense of deserving relatives, who have, at any rate, in Equity, a claim to at least some small share thereof.

The Law of Italy corrects this injustice, and no man can will away at death the whole of his property to strangers, if he leaves a Widow or Relatives living of a nearer kinship than a First Cousin.

Now Vincentio Dorando was an Italian subject, whose nearest living relative was a First Cousin once removed. He had been educated at Oxford and had spent the greater portion of his life in England, but at the time of his death he was domiciled in France. He left no property of any sort in Italy or France, and no duties were found to be payable in either of these Countries. He had property in England, however, which consisted of £15,000 Japanese 41⁄2½ per cent. Bonds at 94, a Freehold House valued at £2,500, and some Furniture and Pictures which were stored at Messrs. Hudson's Repository, and which were valued for Probate at £480. The only debt due at death was a Tailor's Bill for £62.

He had made a perfectly valid Will in England, by which he bequeathed all his property, with the exception of his Real Estate, to his old Oxford friend, Mr. James Duncan, for life, with remainder over to Mr. Duncan's eldest son. He left the Freehold House to another Oxford friend, Mr. Wallstone.

Show what Duties were payable to the Inland Revenue Authorities upon the death of Mr. Vincentio Dorando.

The Jollybuck Twins —as they appeared, no doubt, to Mrs. Jollybuck and the Nurse—prospective world-geniuses.

PROBLEM No. 9.

The Nurse described them as the most wonderful Twins she had ever seen; but then Monthly Nurses always speak in this way!

The Mother said that she had never known children exhibit such intelligence at so early an age; but then Mothers always think in that way, especially of their first!

The Father wanted to drown the yelling little brats, and had turned on both taps in the bathroom; but then Fathers always want to do something rash!

Altogether it was a very merry little family, and when the Twins were three months old and had been duly christened and vaccinated, Mr. Jollybuck called on his Solicitor and altered his Will so as to provide for the family which had been so anxiously hoped for and so long in coming.

But alas for Mrs. Jollybuck, for whom Widow's weeds were to be so soon necessary, and a plague on all false chemists who fail to label their blue bottles "With Care." Mr. Jollybuck swallowed Carbolic Acid instead of Ipecacuanha Wine, and after the payment of Estate Duty, Debts and all Expenses, except Legacy Duty, his Estate consisted of £16,000 Cash on Deposit at the London, City and Midland Bank, £15,000 India 31⁄2% Stock at 92, and Furniture valued at £500. By his Will he left:

Draw up a Statement showing the amount each beneficiary under Mr. Jollybuck's Will is entitled to receive.

PROBLEM No. 10.

Family Trees are almost as interesting to study as Bradshaw, and, at any rate in this case, quite as instructive. In fact, without a Tree it is almost impossible to remember who Mrs. Gubbins really was.

The following, which eliminates all irrelevant matters, gives the descendants of George Gubbins, the founder of the family:—

                  George Gubbins
   _____________________|___________________
   |        |         |                    |
George    John    Charles                Oscar
   |        |         |                    |
 John    George    Oscar                Charles
   |        |         |        ____________|_____________
   |        |         |        |       |       |        |
George    John    Charles    Rose   Violet   Daisy   Poppy

Now John Gubbins, the grandson of George Gubbins, founder of the Gubbins Family, married Elizabeth Greatheart, on Christmas-Day, and on the anniversary of their wedding day little George Gubbins first saw the light. But little George knew not his father, for John Gubbins died when George was but two months old.

In his Will John Gubbins appointed his Cousin, George Gubbins, to be his executor, and thus it was that George Gubbins was brought into close touch with the Widow Gubbins.

Friendship ripened into love and resulted in Mrs. John Gubbins becoming Mrs. George Gubbins. In due course Mrs. George Gubbins presented her husband with a little boy, who was christened John after his first cousin once removed.

Little John grew in grace and played very prettily with little George Gubbins, who was his stepbrother and second cousin rolled into one, and altogether it was a very happy little party, until one day little John's Father, George Gubbins, was knocked down by a Steam Roller just in front of his own house, and was rolled into his own gravel drive.

Now the Steam Roller belonged to a Company, of which Oscar Gubbins, son of Charles Gubbins and grandson of George Gubbins the Founder of the Family, was a Director.

Hearing of the accident he hastened to comfort the Widow in her affliction, and succeeded so well that after a decent interval had elapsed Mrs. George Gubbins became Mrs. Oscar Gubbins.

A child was born two years later, three months prior to the death of Oscar Gubbins, the Father. The little boy was christened Charles, and after the funeral of Oscar Gubbins, Mrs. Gubbins took her three little boys, George, John and Charles, to Ventnor, in the Isle of Wight, for a change of air.

It was in the lounge of the Sea View Hotel at Ventnor that Mrs. Gubbins met Mr. Charles Gubbins, first cousin to her three late husbands.

Now Mr. Gubbins had ofttimes heard of the much-weeded Widow, but when he saw her for the first time with the naked eye, he realised what happy men John, George and Oscar Gubbins must have been.

"When Mr. Charles Gubbins saw her for the first time with the naked eye, he realised what happy men John, George and Oscar Gubbins must have been."

And when Mrs. Gubbins first saw Mr. Charles Gubbins she thought how empty widowhood really was, and what fine men were the Grandsons of George Gubbins, Founder of the Gubbins Family.

Such feelings were not to be denied, and after three months of courtship Mr. Charles Gubbins and Mrs. Oscar Gubbins were declared man and wife by the Rev. Stephen Collins.

For 10 years Mr. and Mrs. Charles Gubbins lived together as happily as a married couple could, and four beautiful daughters, Rose, Violet, Daisy and Poppy were born to them.

And then Mrs. Gubbins died intestate leaving Personal Property valued for Probate at £12,000, and Real Property valued at £8,000.

How was this divided?

PROBLEM No. 11.

Some people say there is no romance in business and that a Brass Plate never brings Clients. Don't you believe that for one moment. Why, Jones owed all his misfortunes in life to a Brass Plate and a Motor 'Bus! It happened as follows:—

Mrs. James Wardle's Husband died on the 30th April, 1914. He was always called Mrs. Wardle's Husband, and he very properly left her his entire fortune, which, at his death, consisted of the following property:—

Mr. Wardle had for many years left his affairs entirely in the hands of his Solicitor, but Mrs. Wardle, who was Sole Executrix, thought—and very properly too—that the combination of a Solicitor and a Professional Accountant was to be preferred. She therefore journeyed to the City with the intention of consulting her Stockbroker on the matter, but by a curious Providential dispensation, the Motor Omnibus broke down just opposite Jones' office, and his Brass Plate attracted the Sweet Lady's attention!

He prepared the Estate Duty Account, the affidavit being delivered on the 31st July, 1914, and he is now Mrs. James Wardle's Second Husband.

Do as Jones did, but ignore Income Tax, and beware of Widows.

"Julius Jones was a poet."

PROBLEM No. 12.

Julius Jones was a poet, and although he died prematurely on the 30th June, 1914, his name will be remembered by posterity as the author of the beautiful Hymn, of which the first line runs "Farewell, old buck, we part to meet again!"

He left the following Estate:—

Liabilities at death were £200, and Funeral Expenses amounted to £30. Legal Expenses were also paid, amounting to £170.

The Securities and the Furniture realised £19,000 and £300 respectively.

A Legacy of £500 was left to his Nephew (free of duty).

The eldest Son of the Testator (Patrick) was given the option by the Will to take over the Freehold Property at £7,500, which he elected to do. The residue of the Estate was to be divided equally between the three children of the Testator:—

Patrick,
Peter,
Paul,

but he directed that the amounts of £3,000 £2,000 and £1,000 advanced to them respectively on the 1st June, 1911, were to be brought into hotchpot.

Prepare an Account showing the division of the residue, taking into account the Duties payable, but ignoring Interest on Advances.

"Duly witnessed by his aged Housekeeper, Mrs. Uskins, and the Gardener."

PROBLEM No. 13.

It would be indelicate to indicate the exact portion of Mr. Hobson's anatomy that was so fiercely attacked by the mad dog, but it is sufficient to say that the bite was the indirect cause of his death.

He anticipated the end, for shortly before he passed away he called in his Solicitor, Mr. Crawley, and made a fresh Will, which was duly witnessed by his aged Housekeeper, Mrs. Uskins, and the Gardener.

The Estate, which consisted entirely of Personal Property, comprised:—

The debts due by deceased, including a Loan from the Bank secured on the Bonds to Bearer, amounted to £3,160, and the Funeral Expenses came to £42.

The Property was bequeathed as follows:—

Prepare a Distribution Account.

"London and North Western Consolidated Stock."

PROBLEM No. 14.

Solomon Solfar was a solemn man, and his Will was proved in solemn form. He died quietly in his bed on the 1st April, 1912, leaving a Widow, two Sons (Matthew and Mark), and one Daughter (Mary).

On the 1st April, 1913, after all Debts, Testamentary and other Expenses had been paid, the Estate consisted as follows:—

Mr. Solfar made during his lifetime advances of £500 to each of his Sons, which at his death were brought into Hotchpot, and interest charged thereon at 5% per annum. He directed his Estate to be left in Trust, the Income to be applied, first in payment of £75 a quarter to Mrs. Solfar, and the balance to be distributed half-yearly in equal shares to Matthew, Mark and Mary.

Write up the books of the Trust, ignoring Income Tax, for the year ending 31st March, 1914, the balance of Income in hand on 1st April, 1913 (after making all necessary payments to the beneficiaries) being £12 0s. 0d.

Mr. Hopkins' bodyguard, The Pride of Bristol.

PROBLEM No. 15.

The life of Hezekiah Hopkins had been a warning rather than an example to others, and the administration of his affairs at death caused his Executors and Trustees to use words which are only permissible amongst gentlemen when the ladies have withdrawn from the dinner table.

Mr. Hopkins died on the 25th June, 1913.

His Will had been proved, Estate Duty and Legacy Duty had been paid, but the Trust could not be closed owing to the fact that the Residuary Estate had been left to Nathaniel Hopkins, a nephew, for life with remainder over to the said Nathaniel's eldest god-son Walter Blackside, subject to an annuity of £200 which the Testator had covenanted to pay to the "Pride of Bristol," a prize fighter, who had acted as bodyguard to Mr. Hopkins during that gentleman's earthly peregrinations.

The Residuary Estate consisted of the following property:—

Upon the 25th June in each year the balance of Corpus Realised was to be placed on deposit with the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank at 4%, less any fraction of £100 which was to be retained on Current Account at the Union of London and Smith's Bank.

Mr. Nathaniel Hopkins died on the 25th June, 1916.

Write up the books showing the position of affairs when Mr. Blackside came into the property, ignoring Income Tax.

PROBLEM No. 16.

Mrs. Wiggins was the Life Tenant and Mr. Gilbert Gunter was the Remainderman of the Property left by the late Ebenezer Wiggins.

Mr. Gunter had begun to despair of ever enjoying the fruits of Mr. Wiggins' generous intentions, when, fortunately for him, on the 14th March, 1914, Mrs. Wiggins got a fish bone lodged in her gullet and died two hours later.

The Accounts had been prepared regularly on the 21st September each year, the anniversary of Mr. Wiggins' death, and the following is the Balance Sheet, dated 21st September, 1913:—

Mr. Gunter requires Accounts to be prepared, showing the position of affairs at the 14th July, 1914, and volunteers the following information:—

Write up the Accounts for the period, making the necessary adjustments, and prepare Balance Sheet dated 14th July, 1914, showing the amount due.

PROBLEM No. 17.

Mr. Montagu Summers had a conscientious objection to the Income Tax, and a positive loathing of the Super-Tax, and the trouble lay in the fact that he had amassed a considerable fortune in the City of London.

Something had to be done, however, to relieve Mr. Summers of a portion of this scandalous taxation, and so, converting as much of his property into cash as he could spare, he invested the same in various ways in other countries.

He bought Russian 41⁄2% Bonds in Holland of the nominal value of 200,000 Guilders, and a Freehold Farm near Amsterdam, which cost in English money about £8,000.

He bought Freehold Land in Canada, for which he paid £80,000, and deposited with the Calgary Investment &Security Trust $300,000 at 5%.

He lent on Mortgage in New Zealand £40,000, and he had a balance of Fcs. 8,600 to his credit at the Swiss Bankverein, Berne.

"Mr. Montagu Summers had a conscientious objection to the Income Tax, and a positive loathing of the Super-Tax."

On the 14th November, 1913, Mr. Summers died of blood poisoning, the result of cutting a corn with a blunt razor.

His property in England consisted of his Furniture and Effects valued at £3,800, Cash balance at the London, City &Midland Bank, Queen Victoria Street, £300, and his interest as a Partner in the firm of Montagu Summers &Nephew, which was agreed at £32,640.

The Russian Bonds were sold on the Amsterdam Exchange for 180,000 Guilders, the Farm was valued at 112,800 Guilders, and the Land in Canada was estimated for duty purposes at $122,000.

Assuming the Death Duties in Holland to be 5%, in Switzerland nil, and the rates in the Colonies to be similar to what they are in this Country, show what Estate Duty would be payable in England.

The rates of Exchange can be taken as follows:—

Holland—12 Guilders = £1
Switzerland—25 Francs = £1
Canada— 5 Dollars = £1

All accruing income to be ignored.

PROBLEM No. 18.

Mr. Harold Wimpole died in his Opera Hat, and was buried in Willesden Cemetery.

His Will had been proved, Estate Duty had been paid, and the Widow, who was the sole Beneficiary, had found considerable consolation in the £56,200 which had come to her.

This £56,200 represented the Gross Estate, less Debts due by Mr. Wimpole at his death £1,416, Funeral Expenses £39 17s. 0d. which were regarded by all, including the Inland Revenue Authorities, as most reasonable, Estate Duty, Interest on Estate Duty £31 16s. 0d., Testamentary Expenses £140 3s. 0d. and Legacy Duty.

"The Curate looked at the Widow, and the Widow looked at the Curate."

Eight months had passed away and the rules of Society permitted Mrs. Wimpole to smile occasionally; the Curate, who took an extraordinary interest in Mrs. Wimpole's salvation and the carving of an ancient Japanese Cabinet, had called for tea. The Reverend gentleman, with a sandwich in his hand, was recording the incidents connected with the birth of Buddha, when his fingers happened to touch the spring of a secret drawer in the aforementioned Cabinet.

The Curate looked at the Widow, and the Widow looked at the Curate, and there they stood together, hand in hand, like two young children, in silent amazement, for the secret drawer in the Japanese Cabinet disclosed 25 41⁄2% Foreign Government Bonds to Bearer, of the nominal value of £500 each, and several memoranda of Stock Exchange dealings between Mr. Wimpole and his Broker. The coupons were payable on the 10th March, and the 10th September in each year, and the last coupon which had been cut off was dated 10th September, 1912, exactly 8 months previous to the death of Mr. Wimpole. Mrs. Wimpole consulted the Reverend Oscar Veritas long and earnestly over the matter, and the Reverend Oscar admitted that it was a case necessitating very great firmness of character and honesty of purpose. Ultimately, however, he arrived at the conclusion that Mrs. Wimpole would be unworthy to bear his name in the future, unless she did her duty in the present instance.

What was the pecuniary value of the good man's conclusions to the Inland Revenue in the matter of Estate and Legacy Duty, bearing in mind the fact that the Bonds stood at 92 on the day of Mr. Wimpole's death, and 90, ten months later when Mrs. Wimpole's Solicitor finally settled the matter?

Note.—The Honeymoon was spent in Japan.

PROBLEM No. 19.

Sir Robert Rushforth, J.P., was a big man with a big heart and a wooden leg. He had inherited a fortune, gone bankrupt, and married a Widow, and if anyone had told him he wasn't a sportsman he would have called that individual a liar, and opened a second bottle.

He died on the 4th June, leaving all his property to his Widow, with the exception of his wooden leg, which he directed to be handed over to the Royal Hospital for Incurables, at Putney.

Such was the man, and the contents of his Will so exactly reflected the character of her husband that Lady Rushforth at once had recourse to the smelling salts on reading the document.

He directed the debts, from which he had obtained a legal discharge in Bankruptcy, to be paid in full, he forgave all his Debtors, and instructed his Widow, whom he had appointed sole Executrix and Residuary Legatee, to meet in full all his Gaming Debts. He further directed that a certain debt, in respect of which he had pleaded in his younger days the Statutes of Limitation, should be paid in full.

The name of this latter creditor was Gunter, and the debt, amounting to £25, was in respect of repairs to certain pigsties.

The discharge from Bankruptcy had been obtained by Sir Robert eight years previous to his death. His liabilities had amounted to £16,200, and he had paid 2s. 6d. in the £.

He owed his bookmaker, Mr. Hollins, of Houndsditch, £200.

He had lent his Vicar, the Rev. Aaron Cranium, £100, his sister Blanche £300, and his intimate but impecunious friend, Mr. Algernon O'Gizzard, £50. This latter loan was rendered necessary by reason of the fact that Mr. O'Gizzard had stood bail for a friend who had got into trouble with the police, and who failed to put in an appearance before the Magistrates on the day appointed. Now, Sir Robert happened to be on the Bench that morning, and ordered the bail to be estreated before he realised with whom he was dealing.

Apart from the above property Sir Robert left Personal Estate valued at £62,000. There was no Real Property.

Show what Estate Duty and Legacy Duty were payable upon Sir Robert's death.

PROBLEM No. 20.

Mr. James Hotchkiss died in the autumn of age on the morning of his 93rd birthday.

During his protracted life he had always surrounded himself with every comfort, and was reputed to be an exceedingly rich man.

No wonder then that his death should occasion an unparalleled outburst of grief and hatbands on the part of his weeping relatives.

After the funeral, the chief mourners met in the library and the Family Solicitor, with a glass of wine within easy reach, read out the last Will and Testament of James Hotchkiss Deceased.

This interesting document brought a ray of comfort to bleeding hearts, for several substantial Legacies were mentioned, all free of duty, and two at least of the prospective Legatees were observed to make rapid calculations on the left shirt cuff.

"To Rachel and Joyce Proudfoot (my sister's little girls, aged 32 and 27 respectively), £10,000 each."

Joyce: "Think of it, Rachel!! Ten thousand pounds!!! Why the young fellows will simply chase us!!!"

To Sophia Hotchkiss ("my own dear Wife") the deceased left his Horses, Carriages, Motor Car, Household Furniture, Pictures, including the Landscape by Earp, Linen, Plate, Glass, &c., absolutely.

To George Proudfoot ("my dear sister's only son") the deceased left his Hornèd Cattle, i.e., Cows, and £20,000.

To Rachel and Joyce Proudfoot ("my sister's little girls"), the deceased bequeathed £10,000 each. The Misses Proudfeet were aged 32 and 27 respectively.

To Richard, William and Algernon Hotchkiss ("my never-to-be-forgotten brother's sons") the deceased left £20,000 each, and to John Willett ("my faithful valet"), £2,000.

The Residue of the Estate was bequeathed absolutely to the Widow.

The Executors lost no time in having the Property valued and the debts due by the deceased at his death, ascertained, and their efforts disclosed "a very lamentable state of affairs," at least, such was the opinion expressed by the Reverend Stephen Collins who had called to comfort the Widow in her affliction.

The Horses, Carriages, Motor Car, &c., including the Landscape by Earp, were valued at £2,000; the Hornèd Cattle, i.e., the Cows, were put down at £400, and the rest of the Property at £40,893 16s 0d.

The Debts due by the deceased amounted to £1,720 0s. 0d., and the Funeral Expenses to £339 7s. 0d. These latter were considered unreasonable by the Inland Revenue Authorities, and in spite of several very eloquent appeals addressed to them by the Executors, including a touching letter from the Reverend Stephen Collins dealing with the blameless life of the deceased, the amount allowed was fixed at £33 16s. 0d.

The Testamentary Expenses, exclusive of Estate Duty, amounted to £186 13s. 0d.

What amount was eventually received by each Legatee?

"At the age of 16 he made the acquaintance of Miss Harriett Hopkins. In the following spring he had successfully reached the 'Walking-out' stage."

PROBLEM No. 21.

Mr. and Mrs. Turvey were justly proud of their son "'Erbert." He was their only child, and always wore a Frock Coat, Brown Boots and White Spats on Sunday. In fact, as everyone said, he gave a tone to Bethnal Green.

But the ways of Providence are strange, and it is futile to seek for explanations where none are vouchsafed. It is enough to say that Mr. Herbert's anatomy came into violent contact with a brewer's dray one Thursday afternoon, and that a promising young life was cut short at the early age of 19.

His Life Story has yet to be written, and it is but the barest outline that can be here recorded.

At the age of 16 he made the acquaintance of Miss Harriett Hopkins. In the following spring he had successfully reached the "walking out" stage. He was formally engaged at the age of 17 and at 18 he was married. Six weeks before he died he made two very remunerative investments. He borrowed from his Employers—without worrying them about so small a matter—the sum of £6, which he converted into £600 by successfully backing "Hump Back" at 100 to 1 for the "Cesarewitch." He also insured his life for £100.

Having satisfactorily adjusted the small matter of the Loan without in any way arousing his Employers' suspicions, he joined a Burial Club, made a Will, and died ten days later.

By his Will he appointed his Widow sole Executrix, and divided his Estate as to one-fourth part to his father Oliver Turvey, as to one-sixth part to a former landlady Mrs. Korphdrop, and the residue to his Widow.

The Estate consisted of the following:—

The Funeral Expenses amounted to £12.

Mr. Herbert Turvey was buried on the third Thursday after Guy Fawkes' Day, and on the following Tuesday fortnight the Widow gave birth to a son. Both mother and child progressed amazingly and everybody called to visit Harriett, but chiefly to satisfy their curiosity as to the amount which she inherited.

Don't keep them waiting.

PROBLEM No. 22.

Mrs. George Dumpkins was very vexed that any Estate Duty at all should be payable, and when she was told that a Corrective Affidavit would have to be presented she threatened to change her Solicitors. As she very properly said she had sufficient troubles already without having to pay for more, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whoever he was, ought to be ashamed of himself for taxing Widows so scandalously.

She entirely disagreed with the opinion of her Solicitor as to the necessity of presenting this Corrective Affidavit, and insisted upon having Counsel's opinion on the matter. The following facts were therefore submitted to the learned gentleman:—

Mr. Dumpkins' Estate had been proved for Probate purposes at £71,000, but during the year after death the following Assets were realised and Liabilities settled, viz.:—

The opinion of Counsel was received in due course, and the Solicitor smiled.

By what amount was the Estate Duty increased or decreased? Ignore any adjustment in respect of Interest on Estate Duty.

PROBLEM No. 23

Mr. William Wiggins made all his money out of Pickles, and when he died his body was embalmed. To use the Widow's words, "'e 'opped it" on the 14th June, 1914.

He left his fortune to Mrs. Wiggins, his nephew Herbert Huggins (commonly known as 'Erb 'Uggins), and his cousin Joe Gubbins, in equal portions.

The Will was duly proved, Estate Duty at 9% was paid, and the interest on the Estate Duty amounting to £165 3s. 0d. was paid on the 14th November, 1914.

What was the value of the Net Legacy received by each Beneficiary? There was no Real Estate.

"For nearly 25 years he had been a Judge of the Probate Division."

PROBLEM No. 24.

Mr. Justice Oats died in harness. He worked like a horse throughout his long career on the Bench, and was universally regarded as a thoroughbred sportsman. For nearly 25 years he had been a Judge of the Probate Division of the High Court of Justice, and like many others in a similar position, died intestate. Not that this was the intention of the learned Judge, for he had prepared a Will on the back of an envelope, but forgetting that even he was subject to the laws of the land, had entirely overlooked the necessity for signing it. He died, therefore, intestate.

His Net Estate, after the payment of the Estate Duty on the Personal Property, amounted to £68,570, of which the Real Property was valued at £24,200.

For many years the Judge had been a Widower, and his only child had died in infancy. His youngest brother, Alfred, was living, however, and he had a nephew, the son of his deceased brother Charles. The Judge had, in addition, three first cousins, one of whom was a lady who had thrice refused offers of marriage, the acceptance of any one of which would have made her Lady Oats. She was, however, a Quakeress, and her enemies hinted that she refused the Judge lest the combination of the name of her religious faith and her marriage name should bring upon her the nickname of "Lady Porridge."

How was the Judge's property divided?

PROBLEM No. 25.

The following letter was received by the Rev. Stephen Collins on the 22nd March, 1914:—

Note.—The breakfast was a great success. Everybody turned up and the Rev. Stephen Collins spoke for 47 minutes. The £5,000 Stock was sold at 90 net, and the necessary entries were made in the books of the Trust, showing the settlement of Montgomery's interest in the Estate.

What was it?

"The Rev. Stephen Collins spoke for 47 minutes."

PROBLEM No. 26.

Sir John Hopper, Bart., died on the day set apart for the Feast of St. Valentine. He had been a Widower for some 12 years, and the age of his only daughter was 23.

The Family consisted of four Sons and one Daughter, whose names in order of age were:—

John Long,
George Rhode,
Oscar Truclod,
Charles Grarze,
Rose Marie.

Sir John died intestate, possessed of the following Estate:—

Show how the Estate of Sir John Hopper will be divided.

PROBLEM No. 27.

Colonel Filbert, stepson to the late Sir Hazel Knut, paid a brief visit to the Brazils, and died on the voyage home on the 1st January, 1914.

He left a considerable Estate, and bequeathed many useful Legacies, all free of Duty, to deserving Relations and Friends. One of the provisions in his Will was to the effect that a sum of £5,300 should be placed on Deposit at the Bank to be paid over by instalments at regular intervals to his two Executors, John Bunting and Nathaniel Whittel, and was to be regarded by them as a Salary for their services.

Each was to receive a Starting Salary at the rate of £500 per annum, but whereas John Bunting's Salary was to be increased by £100 per annum, Nathaniel Whittel's Salary was to be increased by £25 half-yearly.

As soon as the £5,300 was exhausted the Salaries were to cease, and in the meanwhile the Interest on the Deposit was to be paid over to the General Estate.

The Salaries were to be drawn half-yearly, the first to be payable exactly six months from the date of Colonel Filbert's death.

Write up a Cash Account, showing how the Legacy of £5,300 was divided between the Executors.

"Miss Tulip's heart was forthwith pierced."

PROBLEM No. 28.

Every Sportsman will admit that it is immoral to bet upon a certainty, and most business men will endorse the maxim that only fools speculate without inside information.

Now Mr. Hunter never gambled, but he was open, like most other men, to a sound speculation, and when he learned in his capacity of Clerk to a well-known Solicitor that Miss Rose Tulip had inherited a fortune of £60,000 odd, he naturally felt interested.

Many obstacles separated Mr. Hunter from the object of his choice, but he persevered, and on one particularly sunny afternoon he let loose a chance arrow with such well-directed aim that Miss Tulip's heart was forthwith pierced.

The Engagement caused some little flutter in the Dove Cot, and Lady Tulip, Miss Rose's widowed Mother, at once changed her Solicitors in spite of a promise on their part to decorate Mr. Hunter with the "Order of the Boot," a promise which was promptly converted into an accomplished fact.

Every effort was made to induce Miss Rose to reconsider her decision, but this only seemed to lead to further complications, for on the 14th July Mr. George Tulip announced his engagement to Mr. Hunter's only sister, Rebecca.

This was the last straw and the lamentations of the proud Tulip Family were only exceeded by the rejoicings of the Family Hunter.

The prospective Bridegrooms met and made all the necessary arrangements, and Mr. Hunter, who had had a legal training, drew up four simple Wills whereby each left to the Widow, or Widower, all the worldly goods of which he, or she, was possessed.

These documents were signed and witnessed, and four days later the double wedding was solemnized quietly at the Church of Saint Augustine.

After the ceremony Mr. and Mrs. Hunter and Mr. and Mrs. Tulip journeyed to Liverpool Street Station and caught the 2 o'clock train to Clacton, where the honeymoon was to be spent.

They arrived comfortably in time for tea, and Mr. Hunter insisted on treating the whole party to Winkles.

Now, whether it was the Winkles or whether it was the pins, is a matter upon which the two London Specialists who were called in failed to agree, but the fact remains that within a very short time of devouring the aforementioned delicacies, the whole party became alarmingly ill, and two days later Mr. Tulip and Mrs. Hunter died.

Mr. Tulip's Estate, which consisted entirely of Personalty, was valued for Probate at £8,420, and Mrs. Hunter's Estate, which consisted entirely of Realty, was valued at £72,422.

What Legacy and Succession Duty was payable on behalf of Mrs. Tulip, and by Mr. Hunter?

PROBLEM No. 29.

The Rev. Stephen Collins delivered a very moving address on Total Abstinence at the Mothers' Meeting on the 14th June, 1913, and three weeks later Mr. Gunter died.

Now some of the parishioners were inclined to connect the two events, particularly as Mrs. Gunter happened to form one of the band of Mothers on that memorable occasion, and was known to have given her husband Toast and Water for Supper on the following evening.

Be that as it may, it is an undoubted fact that Mr. Gunter, in a codicil to his Will, nominated the Rev. Stephen Collins in place of Mrs. Gunter as Life Tenant of the Income arising from the property of which he (Mr. Gunter) died possessed.

After the payment of all Duties, Debts and Expenses, this property consisted of Assets producing Income as follows:—

The Income was received regularly on the due dates and the Reverend Gentleman had given a formal receipt for everything due up to and including the 31st December, 1913.

On the 30th April, 1914, Stock No. 1 was sold cum. div. at a profit of £500, and the proceeds were re-invested in a security, the income from which was £320 per annum, free of tax, payable half-yearly on the 30th June and 31st December.

On the 20th June, 1914, Stock No. 2 was sold ex. div. at a loss of £100, and the proceeds were re-invested in a Stock ex. div. bringing in £140 per annum, free of tax, payable quarterly on the usual quarter days.

The Rev. Stephen Collins recognises that the Trustees are honourable men and that their intentions are worthy, but nevertheless he is anxious and wishes to be in a position to reassure Mrs. Collins as to the income which he will receive for the year ending 31st December, 1914.

It is interesting to note that Mr. Collins has now published the Address delivered at the Mothers' Meeting on the 14th June, 1913, trusting that the seed sown broadcast may find its way into fruitful soil.

PROBLEM No. 30.

A prosperous Solicitor usually occupies very dirty offices, and his furniture is mostly Mid-Victorian and rickety.

Mr. John Storalore was no exception to this rule and never seemed to object to such surroundings, but on the contrary always appeared to be surrounded by such objects.

He was sitting in his office one June afternoon and was dozing over some particularly dusty documents when his clerk announced Sir Pufferby Pawstone. Now Sir Pufferby was an important client who always had his hair cut and called on his Solicitor when he found himself with nothing better to do. It is not surprising, therefore, that Mr. Storalore should receive him with open arms and assume a very profound expression.

After the usual courtesies had been exchanged, and Lady Pawstone's health touched upon, Sir Pufferby announced that he desired to make a Will.

Mr. Storalore was all attention and took elaborate notes of Sir Pufferby's testamentary wishes, which were extensive and complicated. This done, Sir Pufferby begged Mr. Storalore to give him a brief and concise account of the steps which it is necessary for Executors and Trustees to take in the administration of the affairs of a deceased person from the moment of death up to the final distribution of the Residue.

Do not worry about what Mr. Storalore actually said to Sir Pufferby, for Sir Pufferby was an old woman, and Mr. Storalore knew his client, but say what he would have said to you in answer to such a question.

PROBLEM No. 31.

Mr. George Huggins died on the 31st October, 1913, and with the exception of a few legacies, bequeathed free of duty, he left the whole of his property to his Widow for life with remainder over to his friend Mr. Giblets, provided that gentleman outlived Mrs. Huggins.

Now this arrangement placed Mr. Giblets in an embarrassing predicament, especially as Mrs. Huggins' health improved so wonderfully after her husband's death.

It appeared to Mr. Giblets, therefore, that matrimony was the only safe solution of the difficulty, and so he went on his knees before the Widow. But the lady grasped the situation immediately, and declined the honour.

Friendship being thus early at an end Mr. Giblets resolved to worry the Widow, bearing in mind the saying that "Worry kills." So he set himself to quibble about every detail in the administration of the late Mr. Huggins' Estate, particularly as regards the apportionment of Revenue between Capital and Income. But the Widow would not worry, and wisely suggested to the Solicitors that all matters involving accounts should be left to some first-class Firm of Professional Accountants to settle.

This was done, and the following are the Cash Receipts and Payments made by the Trustees up to the 30th June, 1914.

What amount was paid to Mrs. Huggins on the 30th June, 1914?

PROBLEM No. 32.

Mr. Nathaniel Soworthy, a great breeder of prize pigs, had the misfortune to be knocked down one day by his favourite Berkshire Boar, and his head was cut open on the corner of the pig-sty. Notwithstanding the fact that Mr. Soworthy prided himself exceedingly on the extreme cleanliness of his pig-sties, where, as he was often heard to say, he would be quite ready to eat his own dinner, he discovered on that lamentable occasion what must have been the sole surviving microbe on the premises which, entering his circulation, set up blood poisoning with the result that he passed away a few days later, viz., at 6 p.m. on the evening of the 31st January, 1914.

Mr. Soworthy was a man of many hobbies, and in addition to his prize pigs he possessed a unique collection of silver salt-cellars reputed to be one of the finest in the country. This was valued for Probate at £5,000, while the pigs were estimated to be worth £2,500.

In addition he died possessed of the following property:—

By his Will he left the following bequests:

The prize pigs were directed to be sold and realised £2,690. The collection of silver salt-cellars was bequeathed to the Victoria and Albert Museum on condition that it should be shown as a whole and named the Soworthy Collection. This bequest was accepted.

"His famous White Sow, known as the 'Soworthy Sow.'"

The debts due at death amounted to £215, and the funeral expenses to £45.

Within a week of the funeral the famous Soworthy Sow died in giving birth to a fine litter of ten little pigs, two of which unfortunately pre-deceased their Mother. The result of this event had been awaited before sending the Sow to Mr. Wackenbath, who was thus deprived of this mark of the deceased gentleman's affection. The value of the Sow alive had been £50, but dead she was not worth more than £3 10s. 0d., while the litter, whose father was the same Berkshire Boar that had been the unwitting cause of Mr. Soworthy's death, were worth £2 a-piece.

Prepare the Estate Duty Account, the affidavit being brought in on the 31st March, 1914. Show the amount of duty and interest payable.

PROBLEM No. 33.

Referring to the preceding Problem, all bequests were left free of duty and the residue of the estate was left in equal shares to Mr. Soworthy's grand-daughter, his brother, and his adopted son.

The India Stock was sold on the 25th March, 1914, at 77; the Shares in the Improved Pork Pie Factory, Ltd., realised 24/- per share net on the 25th May, 1914, after receipt on the 1st May of a Final Dividend of 1/- per Share paid in respect of the year ending 31st March, 1914, an interim dividend of 6d. per share having been received by Mr. Soworthy prior to his decease.

The Mortgage on "Little Watchem" Farm was called in and paid off on the 30th June, 1914, while "The Piggeries" was directed to be sold and realised £14,500 after payment of all expenses, completion being made on 31st May.

The household goods and implements of husbandry were sold at the same time and produced £3,000 and £120 respectively.

The Policy money with bonus was received on February 25th and the proceeds of the sale of pigs on March 5th, while the income from the Real Estate was received on February 10th.

Estate and Legacy Duties were paid on March 31st, and the debts, funeral expenses and legacies were also paid on the same date. Executorship expenses amounting to £250 were paid on June 14th.

On the last day of each month such portion of the cash balance as was available in round thousands was placed on deposit at 3%.

Prepare Residuary Account as at June 30th, 1914, and state the duties payable on the Residue.

PROBLEM No. 34.

Referring to the two preceding Problems, prepare an Account to be rendered by the Executors to the Residuary Beneficiaries, showing the realisation and distribution of the Estate, the final payment to the Residuary Beneficiaries taking place on July 1st, 1914.

PROBLEM No. 35.

To anyone not in the secret, the conduct of Mr. Pipkin would appear inexplicable, for on March 3rd, 1914, he very deliberately entered a Tobacconist's shop, ordered a threepenny cigar, and afterwards resigned his position as Assistant Book-keeper in Messrs. Macfarlane's Grocery Establishment.

The secret, however, lay in the fact that Mrs. Pipkin had come into money, and Mr. Pipkin very naturally felt himself independent of other people and yearned for the ease and comfort appertaining to the position of a retired gentleman of means.

Mrs. Pipkin's fortune consisted of a life interest in the Property left by Mr. Austen Friars, who died on the 28th February, 1914.

This property was represented by the following assets:—

April, 1914, was the very happiest month in Mr. Pipkin's whole life, and he spent most of his time smoking his pipe in his back garden, or improving his mind by contemplating the educative pictures of the local Cinema.

The months of May and June, however, did not prove quite so pleasant, and by the middle of July Mr. Pipkin actually threatened Mrs. Pipkin that unless she kept the baby quiet he would look out for another job.

And then August came round which proved to be the most miserable month of Mr. Pipkin's whole life, for Mrs. Pipkin was suddenly taken ill after consuming a liberal portion of Tinned Salmon. Never before did he realise how much he loved his Wife or what a blow to his heart her death would be. He never left her bedside and he spared no expense, but, in spite of all, Mrs. Pipkin passed away on the 19th August, 1914.

It would be idle to attempt to depict Mr. Pipkin's feelings; it is enough to say that he became a poorer but a wiser man.

On the 3rd April, 1914, a dividend for the year ending 31st January, 1914, at the rate of 71⁄2% was declared on the 200 shares in the Commercial Banking Co., Ltd., and a similar dividend was declared on the 4th April, 1915, in respect of the year ending 31st January, 1915.

On the 19th August, 1914, a final dividend at the rate of 15% per annum, free of tax, was declared on the 750 Shares in the Perpetual Rays Co., Ltd., for the half year ending 30th June, 1914. An interim dividend had been received on the 31st January, 1914, in respect of the half year ending 31st December, 1913, at the rate of 10% per annum, free of tax.

No interim dividend was paid during the Company's year ending 30th June, 1915; but on the 31st July, 1915, a dividend at the rate of 10%, free of tax, was declared in respect of the year ending 30th June, 1915.

Show the exact amount payable to Mrs. Pipkin and her Estate in respect of her life interest under the Will of Mr. Austen Friars.

"Two Sons, who, if the truth was told, Drank much more than they ought'er."

PROBLEM No. 36.

The following lines were addressed by the Trustee to the Professional Accountant:—

PROBLEM No. 37.

The late Mr. John Bunyon died in affluent circumstances after having, by the exercise of keen business instincts, overcome those obstacles which confront every great philanthropist who combines the cause of humanity with the desire to achieve wealth and fame.

In his early days he vended to a suffering but suspicious public, a commodity known as "Bunyon's Specific"; and it was his custom at this time to commence his nightly oration to his potential patients at the street corner with the words, "Ladies and Gentlemen, I have extracted corns from all the Crowned Heads of Europe."

In later years, when by the aid of judicious advertising he had convinced the public that no home was complete without his famous Specific, Mr. Bunyon sold his business to a Limited Company, and on then calculating his wealth, found himself rich beyond the dreams of avarice.

He thereupon decided to enter Society, and after some difficulty procured an introduction to Mr. James Rooker, who obtained for him—for a consideration—the entrée into that sphere of Social life which he was so eminently fitted to adorn. On Mr. Rooker's advice, he purchased a Freehold House in a favourable quarter of the West End of London, but owing to a desire not to disturb certain Investments, he raised £2,500 of the purchase price by Mortgage, which at the time of his decease had not been repaid.

In view of the great services rendered to him by Mr. James Rooker, Mr. Bunyon promised to remember him and his family in his Will; which led Mr. Rooker to be very solicitous concerning Mr. Bunyon's health until he was certain that a Will had been executed, and subsequently caused him much speculation as to whether an early decease of his Patron might not be more beneficial than the advantages to be gained from him whilst alive.

Mr. Bunyon's death put an end to these speculations, and it occurred under the following circumstances. Having met Mr. Rooker by appointment at that gentleman's house, they spent a merry hour at the card table, much to Mr. Rooker's advantage. They then sallied forth in a Taxi-cab; when suddenly remembering that he had parted with all his ready cash, and knowing that Mr. Rooker never paid for cabs on principle, Mr. Bunyon ordered the chauffeur to drive to Attenborough's and there placed his diamond pin in pledge for the sum of £5. Feeling somewhat faint after this exertion, he instructed the chauffeur to drive to a Chemist's where he ordered a pick-me-up. The Chemist not knowing his customer, considered his symptoms a fit case for a dose of "Bunyon's Specific," of which Mr. Bunyon unwittingly partook, and so met his death.

Mr. Bunyon's Will was found to contain the following Legacies and Devises in favour of the Rooker Family:—

It was found that both the Shares in "Bunyon, Ltd." and the Consols, had been sold shortly before Mr. Bunyon's death. The Freehold House was valued at £6,500, the Diamond Pin at £25.

The Net value of his Estate when aggregated was £108,000. What did the Rooker Family receive, and what duties were payable by them?

by appointment to H.M. THE KING J. MILES &C^o L^TD Printers 68 &70. Wardour S^T, London, W.

Portion of the book cover