The Wampanoags in the seventeenth century
Date: 2024-09-17T00:00:00+00:00

The Project Gutenberg eBook of The Wampanoags in the seventeenth century

This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

Title: The Wampanoags in the seventeenth century

An ethnohistorical survey

Author: Catherine Marten

Release date: September 17, 2024 [eBook #74431]

Language: English

Original publication: United States: Plimoth Plantation Incorporated, 1970

Credits: Steve Mattern, John Campbell and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE WAMPANOAGS IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY ***

TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE

There are 563 separate Notes anchored in the main text; these anchors are indicated by [number]. The Notes remain in the same place as in the original book, after the main text.

There are only two Footnotes in the book. These anchors are indicated by [A] and [B] and the Footnotes themselves have been moved to the end of the book, in front of the Notes.

New original cover art included with this eBook is granted to the public domain.

Minor changes to the text are noted at the end of the book.

THE WAMPANOAGS IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY:

An Ethnohistorical Survey / CATHERINE MARTEN

OCCASIONAL
PAPERS
IN
OLD
COLONY
STUDIES

NUMBER 2 / DECEMBER 1970

PUBLISHED BY PLIMOTH PLANTATION INCORPORATED           $1.00

OCCASIONAL PAPERS IN OLD COLONY STUDIES is a multi-disciplinary journal, appearing at irregular intervals and publishing original contributions generally in the fields of Sociology, History, Anthropology, and Demography which treat as a subject Plymouth Colony prior to the 19th century.

OCCASIONAL PAPERS are available for purchase at varying rates at Plimoth Plantation or by mail. Correspondence concerning the publication and its contents should be addressed to The Editor,
Occasional Papers, Plimoth Plantation, Box 1620, Plymouth, Massachusetts 02360. Contributions of original material as described above will be accepted for reading and possible publication. Manuscripts and photographs or drawings are sent at the author’s risk and will be returned only when accompanied by a self-addressed stamped envelope.

Plimoth Plantation is a non-profit educational organization which receives no tax moneys and is supported principally by admissions to historical exhibits, contributions, and memberships.

OCCASIONAL PAPERS IN OLD COLONY STUDIES/NUMBER 2/DECEMBER 1970
EDITOR: CATHERINE MARTEN
Cover Design: Eric G. Engstrom
Map: Charles McCann
Typesetting and Printing: R. E. Smith Printing Co., Inc., Fall River, Mass.

This map showing the approximate locations of the various New England tribes in the early 17th century is based upon the following sources: Harold E. Driver and William C. Massey, COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS, TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, ns. Vol. 47, part 2, 1957; Douglas Edward Leach, FLINTLOCK AND TOMAHAWK: NEW ENGLAND IN KING PHILIP’S WAR, 1959; Charles C. Willoughby, ANTIQUITIES OF THE NEW ENGLAND INDIANS, 1935

PREFACE

The paper which follows was written by me in 1965. It was originally intended to serve as an in-house guide for Plantation staff to use when explaining Wampanoag culture to visitors. The absence of any other comprehensive treatment of Plymouth’s aboriginal population has made the paper an item much in demand by Plantation staff, visitors, and members of the academic community. Hopefully its publication in the OCCASIONAL PAPERS series will make this ethnographic information available to an even greater number of interested persons.

CM

FOREWORD
by Dr. Alex F. Ricciardelli, Director of the Haffenreffer Museum of Anthropology and Associate Professor of Anthropology at Brown University.

This monograph represents the only extensive ethnography we have of the Wampanoag Indians and provides us with the best understanding available of Massasoit and his people at the time they occupied the coastal areas of southern New England. The author has consulted all the known historical sources and arranged the material into a series of topical categories which will serve as a handy reference to the literature. Useful also are the author’s comments regarding those parts of Wampanoag culture about which we presently have no knowledge.

Southern New England has been one of the neglected areas in the anthropology of North America. This seems strange when one considers that the oldest museums and departments of anthropology in the United States are located here. The usual explanation seems satisfactory enough at first glance: there has been no extensive record of anthropology in southern New England because there are no subjects for study. The indigenous people were among the first to experience the ravages of contact with European colonists. Disease, war, and forced migrations throughout the 17th and 18th centuries effectively depopulated the area of most of its original inhabitants. Those few who remained were supposedly detribalized and merged with the Europeans. Even their artifacts were carted off across the ocean to be placed in cabinets of curiosities. To this day some of the best and largest ethnographic collections of New England Indian material culture are found in European museums and private estates. Further, Colonial towns were located on prehistoric and early historic Indian camps and villages, and in other ways the growing industrial complex of the Northeast covered over or erased the Indian sites. As a result, at the end of the 19th century, when anthropology as a formal discipline emerged, the native peoples and most of the material vestiges of their presence were gone.

There is undoubtedly much truth to this explanation, but one must also examine the history of anthropology in order to understand the reasons for this relative neglect. Shortly after the turn of the century, the subjects anthropologists were seeking inevitably led them westward to the Plains, the Southwest, and other places where the frontier had only recently passed. Anthropology at that time meant studying peoples who still retained, or at most had only recently lost, their tribal organization. Tribal societies were rapidly disappearing and it was crucial that anthropologists bend all their efforts to creating a record of these peoples’ cultures before they were irretrievably lost. The small groups of surviving Algonkian Indians in southern New England, who retained few visible evidences of their traditional culture, therefore attracted almost no attention. Frank G. Speck is a notable exception among the younger anthropologists who were prominent in shaping the discipline in the United States.

The practice of anthropology today is considerably different from the anthropology of 70 years ago. Tribal cultures and societies which are still relatively intact continue to be an important concern, but new dimensions for the study of man have appeared. These new developments make southern New England an important resource for anthropological study. Inter-ethnic relations are now attracting the attention of students to a society which is no longer considered an inevitable melting pot. Portuguese, French-Canadians, Italians, and other immigrants have been a prominent part of New England towns and cities for decades, but we do not yet understand the processes by which they have adapted to American culture. These ethnic segments include the Wampanoag and other Indian groups who have retained their Indian identity after over 300 years of intensive contact. They obviously represent an important phenomenon for study. Many Indian groups are now moving to large cities, including Boston, and some anthropologists are trying to understand how tribal peoples adapt to urbanism as a way of life.

Ethnohistory, the writing of ethnographies from historical documents, is another relatively new way of practicing anthropology. Although the source materials for southern New England are not as rich as those from other areas in North America, there is still a great deal which can be mined from them. Early colonists traded, fought, and proselytized the Indians and the accounts and records they left contain many possibilities for studying cultural processes. We are learning that the value of documents as source materials is as much a function of their ability to answer the kinds of questions that intrigue us as it is a matter of bulk.

It is true that archaeology in New England has been generally less immediately rewarding than in many other areas of North America. The poorer conditions of preservation, the apparent absence of deeply stratified sites and the dense settlement pattern in this region have contributed to this condition. With the emergence of what is now being called historical archaeology, however, new potentials are being realized in New England. The efforts of Plimoth Plantation are showing dramatically that Colonial history can be meaningfully rewritten through the lenses of anthropology and that archaeology does not by any means end where history begins. Indeed, a new understanding is being achieved for that period in early Colonial history when an immigrant European culture was transformed into something distinctively American.

For many anthropological studies that will undoubtedly be made about southern New England, the culture of the 17th century Indians will be an important baseline. This monograph will be one of the valuable sources for scholars undertaking such studies.

THE WAMPANOAGS IN THE
SEVENTEENTH CENTURY
An Ethnohistorical Study
by Catherine Marten

And also those which should escape or overcome these difficulties, should yett be in continuall danger of the salvage people; who are cruell, barbarous, and most trecherous, being most furious in their rage, and merciles wher they overcome; not being contente only to kill, and take away life, but delight to tormente men in the most bloodie manner that may be; fleaing some alive with the shells of fishes, cutting of the members and joynts of others by peesmeale; and broiling on the coles, eate the collops of their flesh in their sight whilst they live, with other cruelties horrible to be related.

One of many fearsome prospects awaiting Europeans who would settle upon the American continent was thus described by William Bradford—Indians. In faraway Europe this simplistic view of the cruel and hostile primitives that inhabited the New World seemed adequate. But Bradford and his friends—known to history as the Pilgrims, who settled at Plymouth Massachusetts in 1620—were destined to see one group of North American Indians in a different way. Who were the Indians that greeted the Pilgrims and what can be told of their culture?

The Indians that inhabited New England are often collectively designated as Algonquians. This name actually signifies a group of tribes whose languages are related and are therefore classified together as members of the Algonquian language family. Speakers of Algonquian languages are not restricted to New England, however; rather they are spread widely over the North American continent. To the west on the Great Plains such tribes as the Blackfoot and the Arapaho, to the north the Naskapi, Abnaki, and Micmac, and to the south along the Atlantic Coast the Powhattan and the Chickahominy are a few examples of members of this large linguistic family. Besides noting that the languages spoken by these groups are related to one another, we can also speak of some broad similarities in culture shared by speakers of Algonquian languages. However, by the time of European contact both languages and cultures had diversified enough that Algonquian speakers from widely separated areas would not have understood one another’s speech and customs.

The tribe of Algonquians with which this monograph is chiefly concerned is the Wampanoags, which inhabited the immediate area around New Plimoth and from whose ranks came such familiar figures as Squanto, Massasoit, Hobomock, and Metacomet (King Philip). This tribe was also sometimes called the Pokanokets, after Pokanoket, Rhode Island, where the Sachems kept their principal headquarters.[1] Because they were closely related linguistically and culturally, however, one can with justification include information pertaining to the immediate neighbors of the Wampanoags—the Nausets, the Massachusetts, and the Narragansetts.[2] The lumping of these groups for the purpose of more completely filling out a cultural description of the Wampanoags is further legitimatized by the fact that since the devastation caused by a plague in 1616 or 1617 the members of these tribes had intermixed to some extent anyhow. The Indian village of Patuxet had formerly been located on the site where the Pilgrims were to establish New Plimoth; it had been wiped out by a plague. The sole survivor from Patuxet was Squanto, who had joined the band of a sachem called Massasoit.

Political relationships among the Indian groups of southeastern New England were variable depending upon the leadership abilities and popularity of their several sachems at various times. Massasoit and his immediate successors seem to have been quite powerful rulers and to have held the several sub-tribes of Wampanoags into a cohesive body.[3] At various times the Wampanoags ruled the Nauset of Cape Cod. They were frequently allied with the Massachusetts and were frequently at war with the Narragansetts. At the time when the Pilgrims arrived both the Wampanoags and the Massachusetts were considerably weakened in numbers by the plague of a few years earlier, which had left the Narragansetts relatively unscathed. The Wampanoags seem to have recognized in the new arrivals a potential ally, hence the Pilgrims were welcomed, albeit cautiously.[4]

The pages that follow attempt to describe as fully as possible the culture of the Wampanoags as it would have been during the lifetime of Plymouth Colony—1620 to about 1690. A few words are in order in regard to sources of information. The normal procedure for gaining ethnographic information is for a trained observer—usually an anthropologist—to live among the people he wants to study, interviewing informants and observing with the aid of notebook, tape recorder, and camera the activities and habits of the groups under study. This sort of a systematic investigation, however, is an invention of modern anthropology and is a phenomenon dating only to the last hundred years or so. Long before that time, contact with the technology, ideology, and diseases of Europeans had so altered the culture and diminished the numbers of most of the Eastern seaboard tribes, including the Wampanoags, that such a study would have been impossible. To describe the culture of the Wampanoags, therefore, it is necessary to turn to the historical record—both written and archaeological—for the only surviving information on these people.

The best sources for information on Wampanoag culture are the journals and letters of travelers and settlers of the 16th and 17th centuries. Among the Pilgrims, Edward Winslow proved to be an exceptional ethnographer, having recorded a number of insightful observations on Indian culture. John Winthrop of Massachusetts Bay sent a collection of Indian artifacts back to England, some of which are still preserved in the British Museum. Of lesser value to the present purpose are writings of the latter half of the 17th century by missionaries who were trying to teach Christianity to the Indians. Their interests were in the progress of the civilized customs of a godly existence, and their writings do not focus upon aboriginal behavior. Information about artifacts and structures, often incompletely described by earlier chroniclers, can be added to by a study of the archaeological remains of Indian activity.

There will be omissions from the cultural description—questions never to be answered. But it is hoped that the bringing together in ethnographic format of what information is extant will give some insight into and further the understanding of Wampanoag culture as it was at approximately the time the Pilgrims encountered it.

DEMOGRAPHY

Estimates of population for the southern New England area are variable. The most widely quoted figure is that arrived at by Mooney—25,000 for the entire New England area, prior to the 1616-17 plague.[5] Other writers place the number at around 20,000 for southern New England alone.[6] In all likelihood, the lower number is the more nearly correct. Population estimates made by visitors to the New England area in the 16th and 17th centuries were based in the main upon what could be observed in the course of a coastwide voyage. And while Indian population appeared dense, the actual situation was one of a considerably concentrated population along the immediate coast, where rich marine resources were available, and a very sparse, often seasonal, occupation of vast tracts further inland.[7]

By the time the Pilgrims arrived, the population of eastern Massachusetts had declined greatly, as a result of the epidemic which we have mentioned before. No one really knows what the disease was that took such great numbers of Indians. The Massachusetts were virtually destroyed—first by the plague and then by wars with the Abnaki during the early decades of the seventeenth century. Population declined from perhaps three thousand to a mere five hundred between the years 1615 and 1630.[8] The Wampanoags had suffered less, but the effects of the plague were still felt heavily by them. Prior to the plague their numbers are estimated to have been two to three thousand, but death depopulated large tracts of land.[9] Altham writes that the nearest Indian town to Plymouth was fourteen miles away.[10] Gookin called them, “a potent nation in former times....”[11] In 1620 they numbered perhaps something over one thousand.[12] The Narragansetts, however, were untouched by the plague; they are said to have numbered some four thousand.[13]

The general result of the settlement of Europeans in New England was to further the trend of Indian depopulation. Whereas the Europeans might hope to have developed or inherited a degree of immunity to the diseases which they carried, such infections proved fatal to the Indians almost without exception. In 1632-33 the Narragansetts suffered a smallpox epidemic which killed some seven hundred, and at the same time it destroyed what remained of the Massachusetts tribe.[14] The well-meaning attempts of missionaries to Christianize the Indians by civilizing them and putting them into European clothes and houses also brought changes to the detriment of their general health. The “civilized” custom of washing, for example, removed the coating of animal fat that the Indian customarily wore to protect himself from cold and insects and exposed his body to previously unknown physiological shocks. Wars of the colonial period also took their toll of the Indian population.

As far as can be told from available information, the density of population in New England just prior to European colonization was .22 Indians per square mile.[15]

HISTORY AND CULTURE CHANGE

The few remnants of Wampanoag oral tradition are vague on the point of tribal history and origins. Most often mentioned is the idea that they came from somewhere to the south and west of their present home. Indeed, this may, according to the thinking of anthropologists, be the direction from which they received the corn that they were cultivating in at least the 16th century. However, the question of a true tribal history must, as is so often the case with pre-literate peoples, remain unanswered.

Early explorers and settlers had their own ideas as to the origins of the Indians they found in the New World. A popular belief was that these were descendants of one of the Biblical “lost tribes of Israel”. Some scholars went to great lengths to show that this was so by comparing the languages and religious concepts of the two groups. Along with this idea went a belief that the skin of the Indians was actually light, but that it was dyed brown during infancy.[16] Whatever may have been the course of their pre-contact history, the arrival of the white man was certainly a significant event for the culture of the Indians of southeastern New England.

Changes were being introduced into Indian culture long before the arrival of the first permanent European settlers. Fishing and whaling industries brought large numbers of ships (nearly four hundred in 1578) to the vicinity of Newfoundland and Cape Breton; incidental trade in furs between the Indians and these vessels covered a six-hundred mile range that undoubtedly included New England.[17] Indian graves which date from this period contain European trade items—the first evidence of the changes being introduced into native culture.[18] The Indians seem especially to have appreciated the value of the metal tools which the Europeans brought.[19] Their own use of metal had been limited to the making of ornaments out of native copper. For heavy work, such as felling trees and dressing game, stone tools were used.

The increasing substitution of metal tools for stone ones brought about changes in Indian technology that continued through the seventeenth century. The situation for New England Indians in general is summarized by Willoughby:

After and during the first two or three decades of the seventeenth century the Indians received from European traders, especially from the French and Dutch, cloth, kettles, hatchets, and many other objects, and the graves of that period have yielded numerous articles of this nature. The native industries of the people rapidly declined. It was principally among the women that the finer arts survived for a time, such as the better class of bag and basket making, porcupine and moose-hair embroidery, etc., although the men continued for a period the production of their excellent wooden bowls and drinking cups.[20]

Technological change was not, however, only a matter of the loss of skill at aboriginal crafts. The Indians were quick to learn useful new techniques from the English settlers. They learned the art of pewter casting, and thus produced pipes and buttons.[21] A further use for their new-found knowledge of metallurgy was noted by Governor Bradford:

They have also their moulds to make shotte, of all sorts, as muskett bulletts, pistoll bullets, swan and gose shote, and of smaler sorts; yea, some have seen them have their scruplates to make scrupins themselves, when they wante them, with sundery other implements, wher with they are ordinarily better fited and furnished then the English them selves.[22]

The history of contact between primitive peoples and Europeans has tended to be similar throughout the world, in that the first to contact and deal with the natives were usually entrepreneurs looking for new profits, followed by missionaries looking to save souls. The Wampanoags likewise experienced this phenomenon. While it was the intention of those who went there to settle to bring Christianity to the Indians, preparations for such a monumental task were not very well laid. English colonists had their hands full for a number of years just getting a living. They had made no provisions for the maintenance of missionaries to the Indians, and English congregations were not eager to spare their own ministers for the task. Thus, it was not until the middle of the seventeenth century at least before systematic attempts to change the Indians’ belief system were begun.

Notable among those who took up the mission to the Indians of southeastern Massachusetts and Rhode Island were Roger Williams, John Elliot, and the Mayhews, father and son. Quite a number of converts were made.[23] Converted Indians were encouraged to dwell together in what came to be dubbed “praying towns”. Such Indians were required to adopt European culture wholeheartedly in terms of dress, housing, habits, etc., and they were required to learn to read as part of their conversion so that they could study the scriptures. The majority of Indians seem to have refused conversion; however, the change on the part of some of them can hardly but have had influence upon the rest.

Another introduction from European culture was alcohol, previously unknown to the Wampanoags and their neighbors. This became a popular item of trade, and some Indians undertook the cultivation of apples for the purpose of making cider.[24]

FOOD QUEST

Annual Cycle: The environment of coastal southern New England was rich in a variety of wild food resources. Because these resources were available seasonally in several differing localities, the Wampanoags, who lived by a combination of hunting, fishing, collecting, and horticulture, moved several times during the year.

Beginning in about April, large numbers of Indians, probably the populations of several localized winter camping groups, would gather at the falls of certain rivers for the upstream runs of fish such as herring.[25] Migratory birds were also taken at this time.[26] The period of taking fresh water and androgynous fish along streams and in lakes continued until planting season, when the Wampanoags moved to the coast.

Summer was a time of gardening; it was also the time when the vast array of marine resources was exploited. In addition, summer brought an abundance of shore birds. Planting involved two crops, with people sometimes moving from a house by an early field to one by a later field in the middle of the summer.

Deer were hunted in the fall; men moved away to the forest to catch the migrating animals. Sometimes women and children would be included in the hunting expedition, if the distance to be traveled was not too far from their summer home. But some people stayed in their summer residences through the hunting season, probably to harvest the last crop. Hunting sometimes lasted until the snow was too deep to move in.

After hunting season the fall and summer encampments were abandoned, and people moved inland, joining with other summer village groups to take up winter quarters in what Williams describes as “thick warme vallies”. There was greater protection from the weather away from the shore, and the warm weather food resources were gone—even the fish moved offshore into deeper waters. From December or January until April, Indians occupied these winter camps and lived on food they had stored during summer and fall and on what could be caught through the ice or trapped during the winter. With the return of spring, they would once again congregate at their fishing places.[27]

Collecting: A number of wild plants were utilized by the Wampanoags for food. These included wild peas, strawberries, gooseberries, raspberries, currants, chestnuts, acorns, walnuts, ground nuts, and the Jerusalem artichoke.[28] Doubtless other nuts, roots, and berries not specifically named by the early observers were also collected.[29] The ground nut (Apios tuberosa) was one of the most important of the wild roots that the Indians used for food.[30] It also helped the Pilgrims keep away starvation during the winter of 1623.

A part of the inventory of collected foods consisted of shellfish. Clams were dug by the women at low tide. Also noted specifically were: horseshoe crab, lobster, oyster, crab, soft-shelled clam, and mussel.[31] The following passage tells of the troublesome quest for lobsters:

This is an every dayes walke, be the weather cold or hot, the waters rough or calme, they must dive sometimes over head and eares for a Lobster, which often shakes them by their hands with a churlish nippe, and bids them adiew. The tide being spent, they trudge home two or three miles, with a hundred weight of Lobsters at their backs, and if none, a hundred scoulds meete them at home, and a hungry belly for two dayes after.[32]

Fowling: The various types of fowl that were taken included turkeys, ducks, geese, pigeons, cormorants, and cranes.[32] This is only a partial list (again the kinds cited specifically by contemporary sources) of the kinds of birds that were actually hunted; there was an abundance of both shore and land birds to be taken at various seasons.[33] Turkeys seem to have been particularly numerous.[34] Pigeons were abundant in Worchester County, so much so that Williams describes it as having been called “Pigeon Countrie”. They were attracted by ripe strawberries and the old garden plots of the Indians, and they were eaten in great numbers because they were well-liked and easy to kill.[35]

The techniques of taking fowl were various. Shooting with bow and arrow was one method, and Indians were very anxious to get guns and shot from the English for the same purpose.[36] Williams says that hunting involved enduring the weather, “... wading, lying, and creeping on the ground, &C.”[37] The method of getting cormorants was to sneak up on them at night as they slept on the rocks along the shore.[38] Netting birds at their feeding places was another way of capture.[39]

Hunting and Trapping: Among the animals hunted or trapped were deer, moose, beaver, bear, wolf, wild cat, racoon, otter, muskrat, and fox.[40] While all of these were eaten, the importance of the smaller animals lay mainly in their pelts. Deer seem to have been the most important of the animals that were hunted.[41] Moose and bear were also of major importance in New England, according to the evaluation of William Wood.[42] Probably the deer was more important to southern New England groups like the Wampanoags, with the frequency and relative importance of moose rising as one traveled northward.

Techniques for taking deer fall into three categories: stalking and shooting, the use of snares, and the use of drives.[43] The stalking method calls to mind the familiar image of an Indian stealthily pursuing a deer through the forest with great skill and patience, using bow and arrow as his weapons. No less important, however, was the use of snares. A snare for deer was made by bending a springy sapling down, fastening it in place, and affixing some sort of noose that would catch the deer by the leg when he, by stepping into it, released the fastening that held the tree down. Acorns were used to bait the snare. Wood tells us that the traps were “... so strong as it will tos a horse if hee be caught in it....”[44] When the Pilgrims went exploring on Cape Cod they encountered such a device:

As we wandered we came to a tree, where a young sprit was bowed down over a bow, and some acorns strewed underneath. Stephen Hopkins said, it had been to catch some deer. So as we were looking at it, William Bradford being in the rear, when he came looked also upon it, and as he went about it, it gave a sudden jerk up, and he was immediately caught by the leg. It was a very pretty device, made with a rope of their own making, and having a noose as artificially made as any roper in England can make, and as like ours as can be....[45]

These devices were also sometimes used for trapping moose, bears, wolves, wild cats and foxes.[46]

Most hunting was carried out during the fall, after a spring and summer of watching the habits and locations of the deer.[47] Ten to twenty or more men from a village would move into temporary quarters in the woods to hunt at this time, each man retiring to his own well-defined hunting territory of “... two, three or foure miles, where hee sets thirty, forty, or fiftie Traps....”[48] It was necessary to tend such a trapline closely, since the human hunter competed with other carnivores for his kill. A circuit of the traps was made every two days. Even so, the hunter might find that a wolf had been there before him, seeing which, he would set to building a trap for the wolf as well.[49]

Unlike the two proceeding techniques, taking deer by means of drives required the cooperative efforts of a number of people. This number might range from twenty to three hundred, according to one observer.[50] Fences of brush were built, sometimes a mile or two in length, through the woods, in the shape of a funnel. Deer were chased into the wider end, and Indians waited at the narrow end to shoot them as they passed. Since it was possible for the deer to leap over the fence, the hunters were careful not to startle them. Working at night, they set snares for the deer that had escaped their arrows.[51] If the evidence from other Indian groups can be applied in this case, it can be said that the hunting party included women and older children as well as the hunters themselves, and that these former were stationed along the length of the brush fence, outside it, to keep the deer from jumping over.

There is evidence that another technique of hunting common in North America, especially among the Algonquians farther north, was also used by the Wampanoags: driving the deer into water where they are more vulnerable to the hunters. There is no direct description of this process taking place, but there is the information that laws made special provision for paying the sachem within whose territory a deer was shot in the water.[52] And Williams tells us that there is a special word to designate the skin of such a deer.[53]

Another hunting device, used for beavers, otters, and wolves, was the deadfall.[54] One variety was made by piling up a large number of rocks, designed to fall on the animal which entered the trap.[55] This style of trap was used because these were animals capable of gnawing their way out of a trap that left them alive.[56]

Apparently allied to hunting, at least in part, was the practice of setting fire to the woods at intervals, in order to burn out the undergrowth.[57] Where this was not done the woods were difficult to travel through, and thick scrub would have hampered deer drives considerably.[58]

Marine Hunting: Marine hunting was not a major activity of the Wampanoags as it was of the Indian groups further to the north; however, it was practiced to some extent. Seals were taken as they napped on rocks in the warm sun.[58] Various species of whale were also common along the more exposed coasts, but it is not known if the Wampanoags actually hunted them in boats. They did make use of both the flesh and the oil of those that were cast up on the beaches.[59]

Fishing: Fish were a major dietary item in the spring and continued to be of importance during the remainder of the year. Both fresh and salt water fish were taken. These included: bass, bream, cod, mackerel, flatfish,[60] skate, haddock, striped bass, sturgeon, Atlantic salmon, shad, herring, frostfish,[61] eels, lampreys, trout, roach, dace, pike, perch, catfish and pickerel.[62] Of these the salmon, trout, shad, herring, bass, and sturgeon run up the fresh water streams from the sea.[63] Trout, roach, dace, pike, perch, catfish, and pickerel are fresh water species only.[64]

Techniques for catching fish varied with the circumstances.[65] The hook and line apparently came in for a good deal of use.[66] However, the only specific fish for which its use is mentioned are bass and cod.[67] To take these fish, the hooks were baited with lobsters.[68] Probably the hook and line was used for ice fishing during the winter, and if so it was also used for pike, perch, bream, and pickerel.[69]

Nets were used to take sturgeon.[70] Nets were placed across rivers at the falls to take bass. The trapped fish were then shot with arrows or speared.[71] Bass were also caught in weirs.[72] The tending of nets went on at night as well as during the day, the fishermen resting on the shore near small fires until it was time to check their nets.[73] Sturgeon were also taken at night—using a different technique. A torch was waved about over the side of the canoe to lure the fish. When the fish came near, an Indian in the canoe would drive a harpoon into his belly. Thus secured, the struggling fish was dragged back to shore.[74] The method of taking eels was to wade into the water, tread them out of the mud with the feet, then grab them.[75]

DOMESTICATED ANIMALS

The Wampanoags’ only domesticated animal at the time the Europeans arrived was the dog.[76] Later, those Indians who adopted European culture as part of their conversion to Christianity seem to have begun keeping the types of livestock—cattle, sheep, goats, pigs, chickens, etc.—brought by the settlers.[77]

AGRICULTURE

Horticulture was a major occupation of the Wampanoags from the spring until fall. Chief among their crops was the native American corn, Zea mays. Historical sources mention a number of colors—red, blue, yellow, and white.[78] Of the squashes and their relatives (all grouped into the family Cucurbitacae) there are mentioned pumpkins and cucumbers.[79] Also cultivated was the native American variety of tobacco, Nicotiana rustica.[80]

Gardening was work done by women, except for tobacco growing, which was the business of men.[81] The implements of cultivation were such things as clam shell hoes, and fish were used for fertilizer. During the time that the corn was growing the women would weed it and protect it from birds. Watch houses might be built in the fields where the gardener or her older children would sit all day to frighten away birds.[82] Sometimes hawks were captured, tamed, and kept nearby the house in order to chase the other birds away from the corn fields.[83]

Corn might be harvested green or allowed to ripen in the fields, depending upon the use for which it was intended. Green corn seems to have been a favorite food, and to get as much as possible two plantings might be made during a summer.[84] At harvest time the women gathered in the corn and prepared it for consumption or storage.[85]

When preparing a new field the first step was to remove the forest cover. Trees were cut down, leaving only the stumps; the branches were burned on the spot. Ashes left from the burning enriched the soil. Gardens were then planted between the stumps.[86] A field thus prepared would gradually diminish in fertility over a period of years of continuous use, despite the addition of organic fertilizers (fish) with each planting. When this happened, the field was left fallow for a period of time, during which a cover of weeds and brush would develop. This cover was then burned off, the ashes worked into the soil, and the field planted again.[87]

FOOD PROCESSING

Preservation and Storage: Both animal and vegetable foods were preserved by drying.[88] With this technique, there was constant danger of spoilage through dampness. Prior to the arrival of the European settlers, salt was not available to the Wampanoags for food preservation.[89] The method of drying fish and shellfish was to cut it into thin strips and hang it on a scaffold over a fire prepared for that purpose. Both the sun and the fire worked to dry the fish quickly; the fire served the additional purpose of keeping away flies, which would have spoiled the food.[90] At night or when the weather was humid, the drying fish was moved to the warm, smoky interior of the wigwam to hang above the fireplace.[91] Corn, chestnuts, currants, beans, and acorns were also preserved by drying. There is no description of the process, save that they were spread out on mats.[92]

Vegetable foods were stored in specially constructed pits in the ground. After they had been dug, the pits were lined with woven mats. The dried fruits or vegetables that were to be stored were put into large baskets (The Pilgrims told of digging up one such basket that had a capacity of three or four bushels[93]); the baskets were put into the pits, covered with more mats and perhaps wooden planks, and the whole thing was covered with earth so that a small mound marking the place was formed.[94] When such could be obtained, a metal pot rather than a basket might serve as a storage container.[95] The dried fish was also stored for winter use, but there is no mention of its being put into the storage pits. It might have been kept in some sort of woven or bark container in the house.[96]

Food Preparation: Meat and fish were prepared by boiling or roasting.[97] Meat was roasted by putting it on the end of a forked stick placed in the ground near the fire.[98] Fresh or dried meat, fish, and shellfish were cut into small pieces and boiled into a stew—whose constituent parts probably varied according to what was available on any given day. A pot of this stew was probably kept over the fire almost all the time, and as some was eaten new ingredients were added. As the following passage by Wood suggests, it was “... made thicke with Fishes, Fowles, and Beasts boyled all together; some remaining raw, the rest converted by over-much seething to a loathed mash....”[99] Vegetables were also added to the stew pot. Jerusalem artichokes, ground nuts and other roots, pumpkins, squashes, corn, and beans are mentioned specifically.[100] Walnuts, acorns, and chestnuts were ground into a powder and added to the broth to thicken it.[101] Clam juice, which functioned as a substitute for salt, was added as seasoning.[102] Williams tells of another sort of dish, prepared from the heads of bass, “... the braines and fat of it being very much and sweet as marrow”.[103] Notes by John Winthrop give the designation Sukatash to a dish which is venison, fish and Indian corn boiled together.[104]

Vegetable foods were also prepared in a number of other ways and combinations. Whole corn was boiled—with or without beans.[105] Corn ground into meal was an important item in the diet of the Wampanoags. Corn kernels were dried and parched in the coals of the fire. Ashes were then sifted out of the parched corn, and it was ground fine with hand milling equipment. A woman then sifted the meal through a basketry sieve to catch out unground lumps, and the result was a meal called Nocake. Nocake was the food of anyone when on a journey away from home. A few spoonfuls made a meal; it was taken with water to facilitate swallowing.[106]

For use at home, the parched meal might be mixed with water and boiled into a porridge.[107] In a more elaborate recipe it was mixed with crushed strawberries, made into dough, wrapped in leaves and baked in the ashes to make a kind of bread.[108] It was also made into small cakes that were boiled. Williams mentions a dish made by mixing corn meal with powdered dried currants, “... which is as sweet to them as plum or spice cake to the English”.[109] He also says that clam juice was used as a seasoning for bread.[110]

Of the nuts used by the Wampanoags, acorns required additional work, since the bitter tannic acid had to be removed from them by some sort of leaching process before they could be eaten. This was done by boiling.[111] Oil was extracted from walnuts and used for a variety of purposes.[112]

FOOD CONSUMPTION

The diet of the Wampanoags, because of their seasonal cycle of resource use, varied considerably. While many kinds of food were preserved for use beyond their season by drying, the supply was probably not so great that the diet was identical throughout the year, if only in terms of the relative quantities of the kinds of food eaten. The diet of the Wampanoags included several varieties of land animals,[113] of which deer were probably the most important. Fresh and salt water fish, shellfish, fowl, and marine mammals, such as were available, were also eaten. Corn, beans, and cucurbits, which they raised, plus various wild nuts, roots, and fruits made up the vegetable part of the diet. While there is evidence that the Indians in Maine used maple sugar, there seems to have been none used in southeastern New England aboriginally.[114] Altogether, according to Bennett, who has made a study of the diet of the Indians of southeastern New England, the Indian diet included more vegetable products than the diet of Europeans living in the same area today.[115]

Squashes came to replace corn as the dietary mainstay in the late summer.[116] Clams seem to have been dug in all seasons of the year; they are spoken of as a food to which the Wampanoags turned when other sources of food dwindled.[117] Acorns were also a food turned to when the preferred diet was scarce, although sometimes they were eaten when there was plenty of corn, as a novelty item.[118] Writing of a visit to the Plymouth area in June, Martin Pring noted that the food the Indians were eating at that time of the year was mostly fish.[119]

There is not a great deal known about Wampanoag eating habits, but some general impressions can be put together. Morton tells us that “... they feede continually”.[120] Wood, on the other hand, notes that it was “... their fashion to eate all at some times, and sometimes nothing at all in two or three dayes....”[121] The apparent contradiction is probably the result of the two observers looking at different sets of cultural circumstances. When there was food available in abundance, everyone probably ate, according to his wishes, out of the stew pot at any time. There were also formal meals held on at least the following occasions: when a guest arrived (i.e. visiting Englishman) and when groups would gather for games and dances. Wood gives a description of what such a “sit-down” meal was like:

... dishing it up in a rude manner, placing it on the verdant carpet of the earth which Nature spreads them, without either trenchers, napkins, or knives, upon which their hunger-sawced stomacks impatient of delayes fals aboard without scrupling at unwashed hands, without bread, salt or beere: Lolling on the Turkish fashion, not ceasing till their full bellies leave nothing but emptie platters ... eating three or foure cornes with a mouthfull of fish or flesh, sometimes eating meate first, and cornes after, filling chinkes with their broth ... At home they will eate till their bellies stand forth ready to split with fullness....[122]

At this type of meal the men ate, and the women waited upon them, being paid by the favor of a bite from time to time.[123] Eating was done from individual wooden bowls, with fingers or spoon, depending upon the consistency of the food.[124]

When one was away from home on a journey and not near enough to any settlement to go there for hospitality, he ate from his pouch of parched corn meal. This might be eaten quickly if he were in a hurry to be off again, by gulping down three spoonfuls of corn meal with some water. A more leisurely meal was one for which the traveler took the trouble to build a fire and cook the meal to eat it hot.[125]

Food seems to have been shared liberally with anyone who was around when people were eating, no matter what it was or how much there was at the time.[126]

Diet was one area in which the arrival of the Europeans seems not to have had much influence. Composition of the diet remained the same as it was aboriginally until the time of King Philip’s War.[127]

DRINK, DRUGS AND INDULGENCE

Prior to the arrival of the Europeans there was no knowledge of alcohol among the Indians of the New England area. Once introduced, however, it became a popular item of trade, and Indians learned how to produce it for themselves.[128]

The Wampanoags and their neighbors, however, did smoke the native American variety of tobacco, Nicotiana rustica.[129] This strong variety of tobacco would not be appealing to modern American tastes. The only place where it is used commercially today is in the USSR. In one instance at least—where the writer characterized the tobacco as weak—it is likely that some was mixed with other plant material preparatory to smoking.[130] Tobacco leaves were picked green, dried, crushed, and smoked in pipes.[131]

Tobacco was used frequently.[132] Smoking was a pleasant diversion. When friends met on the trail they would stop, smoke together, and talk.[133] Tobacco apparently also was used by women.[134] Besides being a refreshing indulgence, taking tobacco was thought to be a helpful remedy “... against the rheume, which causeth the toothake....”[135]

LEATHER, TEXTILES, FABRICS

Work in Skins: Most of the clothing worn by the Wampanoags was made from the skins of animals. Deerskin was an excellent material for clothing, since it was tough but thin enough to be made pliable, was large enough to be used with a minimum of piecing, and was readily available in the environment. Moose hide was used for similar purposes, but being heavier it was perhaps more popular for making shoes.[136]

Deerskin was scraped to remove the flesh, and the tanning process involved working oil into the hide to make it soft and also resistant to water.[137] Thus prepared, the skin used in a pair of leggings could stand to be gotten wet, rung out, hung up and dried by the fire without being harmed by the experience.[138] When a deer was killed during the winter, the thick coat of hair was usually left on the hide.[139] Moose skins were de-haired as a matter of course, according to Morton.[140] Deer and moose skins with the hair removed were decorated by painting or by embroidery.[141] To be a proper skin for wearing, a deerskin had to have the tail left on.[142]

The skins of other game were also used as clothing. Bear, otter, raccoon, beaver, fox and cat skins are mentioned as having been used, although the particulars of their preparation are not recorded.[143] Sometimes the skins of animals not available in the immediate vicinity were traded for from neighboring tribes.[144] The skins of all these animals, including deer, were used also for bedding.[145] Leather was used in the manufacture of bags for carrying fire lighting equipment, tobacco, and parched corn meal. The latter type is described as being long and narrow and carried either slung on the back or tied around the waist.[146]

Contemporary observers do not mention any further uses of leather by the Wampanoags. Among several groups of Indians, such as those who lived by hunting on the Great Plains, leather served not only for clothing, but as the only material available for housing and cordage. Living as they did in the woodlands, the Wampanoags had available a variety of suitable plant material which they used for various kinds of basketry and cordage that served the multitude of purposes served by leather in other regions. Thus among the Wampanoags leather might have been used as the lashings to hold the framing of houses together, or plant fiber might have served this purpose, or both. Such alternatives were available, but it is not known exactly what use the Wampanoags made of them.

Cordage, Netting, Basketry: The Wampanoags used the stems and fibers of several plants for containers, house coverings, nets, clothing, etc.[147] Among the plants used were: bulrushes, bent grass (perhaps also other types of grasses), maize husks, “silk grass”, wild hemp (also called Indian hemp and dogbane—Apocynum cannabenum), flag leaves, basswood fiber, and the bast of other trees with fine inner bark, such as the linden and slippery elm.[148]

Most cordage was made from wild hemp. Basically, the manufacture of cordage consisted of removing the long fibers from the stems of the plant and joining these by twisting and braiding until the desired thickness and length of cord was obtained. The Indians appeared quite skillful in this craft: “... their cordage is so even, soft, and smooth, that it looks more like silke than hempe....”[149] Wild hemp cordage was used in several ways. It was used to make fishing lines.[150] It was also used for tying hooks onto these lines.[151] Hemp cordage was looped into fishnets.[152] One of these, used for sturgeon, is described as being 30 to 40 feet in length.[153] Large storage bags were made out of this material, in a weaving technique known as twining. These were flat and rectangular in shape; their capacity was five or six bushels. They were used for storing food both in the underground pits and inside the houses.[154] Similar bags were also made out of bast fiber.[155]

Hemp is mentioned as having been used in making baskets, where it probably served as weft strands.[156] Hemp cordage was also used to sew together a certain kind of house covering mat.[157] And it was used, along with grasses for woven capes.[158] Mantles were also woven out of turkey feathers, or the feathers of other birds, and cordage.[159] The feathers were probably twisted in among the hemp strands.[160] Such weaving was done without looms.

Matting was produced by two basic techniques, by sewing or by weaving the component elements together. In sewn mats, flag leaves were sewed together with wild hemp thread, using a bone needle.[161] Woven mats were plaited from bulrushes.[162] These latter were used to line the interior of the house, to sit upon, and for spreading out food to dry.[163] Matting was an item that came in for extensive use in the daily lives of the Wampanoags. Besides being a building material, it was used to line storage pits; it also lined or covered their graves.

Basketry was another important item made by the Wampanoags, although their use of basketry was not as extensive as in certain other North American Indian groups. Basketry everywhere serves what is basically a container function, and among the Wampanoags there were available pottery, birch bark boxes, pouches of leather, wooden dishes, and later the metal pots and kettles brought by Europeans—all of which could carry out the job of holding something.

Baskets were made in a number of sizes and shapes, of several different materials, and of varying fineness depending upon the purpose to be served.[164] There were two techniques for weaving baskets, twining and plaiting, though there were probably enough variations upon these basic techniques that not all baskets looked alike to the casual observer. Twined basketry was the more common type at the time that the Europeans arrived in New England. The baskets of “Hempe and Rushes” that Wood describes were probably made by this technique.[165] The manufacture of twined basketry involves wrapping a horizontal weft element, the hemp in this case, around what is usually a more rigid warp, the bulrushes. The basketry made by the plaited technique is what is meant by the term “splint basketry”. In this case, both warp and weft are equally rigid “splints” and are combined by placing each alternately over the other so that, in the most basic pattern, a checkerboard effect results. Basketry made by this technique became more popular during the historic period, and eventually this was the only type made by the Indians in the New England area. At the time New England was being colonized, the main use of splint basketry was in the processing of corn. Square sieves for sifting corn meal were made by the plaiting technique, with varying grades of mesh to sort out ground and hulled corn for various uses.[166] Collecting baskets for harvesting corn were also made by this technique. The basket was worn strapped to the back, secured by a strap across the chest. A larger version of the basket stood at the edge of the field, for transporting the harvested ears of corn back to the house.[167]

Willoughby gives this description of obtaining and processing the materials for splint baskets:

... small ash, white oak, or other suitable trees, were cut in the spring. The logs were sometimes soaked in water, although this was not always necessary. They were then peeled and beaten with wooden mauls until the annual growth layers were separated one from another. These were split into various widths and assorted, strips of uniform size being bound together in bunches or coils.[168]

Baskets were also used to carry the parched corn meal of a traveler (in place of the deerskin pouch).[169] Large baskets, an alternative to bags of hemp, were used to store food in the underground storage pits.[170] One kind of arrow quiver was made of basketry.[171] When moving from place to place during the year, basketry and soft woven bags seem likely to have been the containers in which the Wampanoags carried their baggage.[172]

Very few decorated baskets are known to have survived from this period. The reports of early observers note that baskets were decorated in various colors.[173] A basket seen by the Pilgrims is described as being “... curiously wrought in black and white in pretty works....”[174] But from such scant information it is possible to generalize about decorative style.[175]

CLOTHING

The basic dress for both men and women was the breech clout—a length of deerskin that was looped over a belt in back, passed between the legs, and looped over a belt again in front.[176] In post-contact times this garment was sometimes made of cloth.[177] The breech clout was worn at all times by adults.[178] Female children wore such a garment or its equivalent from early infancy; male children went naked until they were ten or twelve years old.[179]

The Wampanoags did not wear a great deal of additional clothing. For additional protection from insects and cold, the Indians usually wore a thick coating of animal or vegetable fat.[180] The Wampanoags might put on leggings when traveling through scratchy undergrowth. Leggings consisted of two tubes of deerskin, extending from ankle to groin, fastened into the moccasin at the lower end and held up by attaching them to the belt.[181] Leggings were worn by both sexes; those worn by the women may have been somewhat shorter.[182] Leggings were also worn as a protection against the cold, especially by the older people.[183]

Skin capes were a common item of clothing for both sexes.[184] Women’s capes, about twice as long as those worn by men, are reported to have hung down behind like a train.[185] Capes for summer wear were of deerskin—either worn hair side out or made of de-haired skins. For winter wear the hair was left on and turned to the inside.[186] The skins of Beaver, otter, racoon, bear, and fox—the smaller ones being sewed together—were also used for winter mantles.[187] Mantles made of turkey feathers were mentioned previously.[188]

Champlain reported that Indians on Cape Cod (probably Nauset) wore capes woven of grass and hemp fibers.[189] These extended to the thighs and may have been worn in summer as a protection against insects. Or, perhaps they were for special occasions. One fragment of such a mantle, excavated along with a burial near Manchester, Massachusetts, was made of twilled bast fiber.[190] The lower edge of the garment was fringed.[191]

The skin mantle was usually worn passed under the right arm, brought over the left shoulder, and the two ends fastened.[192] For traveling or other activity the garment was bound tight against the body with a belt.[193] In very cold weather the exposed arm was covered with a detachable fur sleeve which was tied on.[194] In the absence of the sleeve, the mantle might be allowed to hang loose, and the wearer alternately cover whichever shoulder was exposed to the wind as he walked.[195]

Both men and women wore moccasins. The preferred material for these was moose hide, but in its absence, deerskin served.[196] Everyone went barefoot in the summer, but they usually carried their moccasins slung on their backs in case of having to travel over very rough ground.[197]

Contact with Europeans brought changes in the style and the material of some Indians’ clothing. Indians were encouraged to adopt English styles of dress as part of the process of their conversion to Christianity. Many, however, found the European style of clothing a nuisance. Wood says: “... their chief reasons they render why they will not conforme to our English apparell, are, because their women cannot wash them when they bee soyled, and their means will not reach to buy new when they have done with their old; and they confidently beleeve, the English will not be so liberall as to furnish them upon gifture: therefore they had rather goe naked than be lousie....”[198] Often, articles of English clothing were worn for special occasions.[199] Some Indians began selling all their skins to European traders and using cloth to make their traditional garments.[200] The cloth which they preferred was a blanket material called “duffils” or “trucking cloth”.[201] Whatever the style and material of their clothing, however, the Wampanoags preferred to wear only the loincloth when they were in their own houses.[202]

Ornament: Copper or brass, breast-plates, necklaces, bandoliers, etc. are often mentioned by explorers who visited the New England coast prior to the establishment of permanent settlements.[203] A change in fashion apparently took place among the Indians of southeastern New England during the early historic period, however, for colonial writers describe the same types of ornaments as being made of shell.

Breast-plates were solid sheets of copper or brass hammered thin and flat.[204] They were about a foot in length and half that wide.[205] Sheet copper was also made into tubular beads. These were about four inches long and a quarter of an inch in diameter. They were made by bending the sheet of metal around a stick from which the pith had been removed to form a hole for stringing.[206] Tubular beads were strung together (long axes parallel) to make bandoliers. Bandoliers were worn diagonally across the chest or sometimes as belts around the waist.[207] Similar fillets made of shorter copper beads were probably worn as headbands.[208] Tubular copper beads strung end to end were worn as necklaces.[209] Gorgets and pendant earrings were also made out of copper and brass.[210]

By the time the Pilgrims arrived, shell ornaments apparently had replaced the metal ornaments which earlier chroniclers said were worn by everyone, for none of the colonial writers mentions Indians wearing copper or brass ornaments.[211] Most shell ornament was based on beadwork, although shell, along with bone and stone was used for ear pendants—cut-outs of birds, fish, and other animals.[212] By at least 1647 wampum was the most popular style of shell beads.[213]

Wampum served as “money” and as ornament. It was introduced into Plymouth colony as an item of exchange in 1627 by the Dutch, for although it was common among Indians to the south, it was virtually unknown as an item of trading value to Indians around Plymouth and farther north.[214] Important people in the tribe had a few ornaments of wampum prior to 1627. Altham describes Massasoit in 1623 as wearing a belt of shell beads that were probably wampum.[215] After a slow start in Plymouth, wampum increased in popularity until it was common to see Indians wearing bracelets, necklaces, headbands, and belts, woven in various designs of small purple and white beads.[216] Collars, caps, and ear pendents were also made of wampum.[217] The beads were strung end to end as well as being woven in bands.[218]

The wampum made in southern New England was fashioned from the shells of the quahog, or hard-shelled clam (Venus mercenaria).[219] Bead blanks were first roughed out from the whole shell then drilled with a stone (later metal—introduced by Europeans) drill. Beads were then strung together and ground into their final shape with an abrasive stone.[220]

There were other, less popular, styles of shell beads and beadwork.[221] Sometimes small discoidal beads (probably quahog and periwinkle) were used instead of the tubular wampum for beadwork, as necklaces, bracelets, and hair ornaments. Like wampum, these beads were white and purple in color.[222] There were also large tubular shell beads that were strung for necklaces.[223]

Bone and seeds were also used for beads,[224] and early explorers report necklaces of variously colored stones.[225]

Besides jewelry, the Wampanoags used painting and tattooing as means of personal adornment. Tattooing was done by two techniques. A sharp instrument was used to pierce and lift a small area of skin, and black pigment was inserted into the wound. By repeating these small incisions close together, decorative lines were formed. This form of tattooing was done on the cheeks; the patterns were zoomorphic “... as Beares, Deares, Mooses, Wolves, &c., some of fowls, as of Eagles, Hawkes, &c....”[226] The other technique of tattooing was accomplished by “branding” with a hot iron. Geometrical shapes were applied to the arms and chest by this method.[227]

Body painting was done in red, yellow, white, and black. Red powder was sometimes put onto the hair.[228] The body and hair were prepared for painting by a thorough greasing; the grease provided a bond for the pigment.[229] Different colors might be used on various sections of the face, or a single color might be used for the whole face.[230] Both men and women wore paint. Paint was worn for mourning, for war ceremonial or festive occasions, and for games.[231] Warriors used lurid coloring to make them appear more terrible to the enemy.[232] Painting the face black, with soot and ashes, was a symbol of mourning.[233] There were undoubtedly many other associations between styles of painting and specific events or social groups, but they were not recorded by seventeenth century observers.

Hairdressing: Of hairdressing, Lechford reported: “They cut their haire of divers formes, according to their Nation or people so that you may know a people by their cut....”[234] There was also variation in hairstyle within the social group. An unmarried girl could be distinguished from a married women by her hair style.[235] At marriage, the women’s hair was cut off, and until her hair grew back she wore a covering on her head.[236] A young man who was not yet a warrior could be identified by his short haircut.[237] Further variation noted among the adults of the same tribe may mean that various kin groups used distinctive styles of hairdressing.[238] Long hair was highly prized, and wearing the hair in a tight “pony tail” was said to make it grow faster.[239] Hairdressing was a daily activity which involved oiling and, according to one writer, dyeing.[240]

Probable Wampanoag hairstyles include the following: hair cut short into bangs in the front, the remainder falling free to the shoulders; hair braided into four braids with part of this knotted behind, and with feathers and other sorts of ornaments stuck into the knot; hair shaved from the front and sides of the head, the remainder left long and made into a knot with feathers in it.[241]

Various forms of ornament, frequently feathers, were an integral part of certain hairstyles. Turkey and eagle feathers are mentioned specifically for this purpose.[242] Single feathers might be stuck into a knotted portion or otherwise intertwined with the hair.[243] Feathers were sometimes joined fan-shape and put into the hair. Fox tails and other fur were also used for hair ornament. Strips of deer hides, dyed red, were tied on, in the manner of a cock’s comb.[244] Other ornaments included ribbons of European manufacture and ornamental combs carved from antler.[245]

Specific information on female styles of hairdress is slight. Champlain describes one style which was a combination of free-falling hair in back and various braids for the rest.[246] Beyond this, there are no descriptions that relate to the Wampanoags.

Sources are contradictory in the subject of facial hair. Some writers report that Indians in this region generally despised and plucked out what little facial hair they had.[247] Another writer of the same period relates that these Indians were at pains to preserve their own thin beards and to add to them by fastening on animal hair.[248]

EXPLOITATIVE ACTIVITIES

Lumbering and Forest Products: Prior to contact with Europeans the Wampanoags used stone tools for lumbering. Large trees felled with these primitive implements were used for the manufacture of dugout canoes.[249] Birch bark, another product of the forest, provided the material for house coverings and containers of various sorts as well as material for another type of canoe. As the range of the canoe birch (B. papyrifera) had its southern limit at Cape Anne on the immediate coast, the use of birch bark by the Wampanoags was probably not so extensive as that of some of their neighbors.[250] Nevertheless, by trade and by seeking out individuals of the species that grew beyond their range, birch bark was obtained and used as an alternative material for the items mentioned above.

Carved wooden bowls and spoons are said to have been a craft specialty of the Wampanoags. Burls were selected for carving material in order to avoid the problem of splitting along the grain when an item was subjected to repeated wetting and drying. Small objects such as fish hooks were sometimes made of wood, and there were other more obvious uses such as poles for house frames, arrowshafts and handles for tools. Bast fiber (inner bark) was used for various woven items. A red dye was made from pine bark.[251] Turpentine and pitch were also products of the pines.[252]

Mining and Quarrying: Both soapstones for bowls and pipes and native copper for ornaments were obtained aboriginally by New England Indian groups. So far as is known, however, the Wampanoags did none of the extraction of these materials themselves. They obtained either the materials or the finished products through trade.[253]

Pigments were probably obtained at various local outcroppings. Limonite furnished yellow; hematite served for some of the reds. The stone used for tools and weapons—quartz and slate—was also locally occurring material.[254] Clay for potting was available in the Plymouth area.[255]

PROCESSING OF BASIC MATERIALS

There is documentary evidence on the manufacture of only a few of the articles fashioned by the Indians out of the products of their environment. In most cases this evidence is fragmentary. What is available is discussed below:

Stonecarving: Both pipes and bowls were carved out of soapstone. As far as is known, most of this work was done by the Narragansetts in Rhode Island; their products were traded into the Plymouth area. Bowls of soapstone were produced wholly or in part at the quarry where the raw material was obtained. Working with picks and chisels of harder stone (later, presumably, with metal tools) the craftsman would rough out the general shape of the bowl, bottom side up, while it was still attached to the parent block. Then he would begin chipping away underneath the bowl and by inserting a wedge remove it from the quarry. The inside of the bowl was then hollowed out with smaller stone adzes and chisels.[256]

Soapstone pipes required considerable skill to manufacture, owing to their small size. Some of these were elaborately ornamented with carved figures, but authorities are still not sure whether the more elaborate pipes were locally made or traded into the Narragansett territory from elsewhere.[257] Shaping and drilling were originally done with stone tools, but steel drills were later used in pipe manufacture.[258]

Metallurgy: The Indians learned to cast metal from the English. Pewter, brass, and presumably lead (for shot) were cast into ornaments, buttons, ammunition, and gun parts.[259]

Buttons and other small ornaments were cast out of pewter using one-piece moulds carved from soft stone. Finishing was done by trimming and grinding away the rough edges. The eyes of buttons were made by trimming the metal with a knife.[260]

Woodworking: The Wampanoags were noted for their skill in woodworking. They made dugout canoes which might be as much as fifty feet long.[261] To make a canoe a suitable tree was first selected then laboriously felled with a stone axe. (During historic times metal tools came to perform this function and others in the process of manufacture.)[262] Initial hollowing out of the log was done by burning.[263] Either the wood was set afire or hot stones were placed on it.[264] The fire was carefully controlled; the idea was to remove the inside and leave the outside intact on three sides.[265] The process was a slow one, taking some ten to twelve days.[266] When the interior had been burned out as much as possible, the job of hollowing and smoothing was finished with shell scrapers.[267] The outside was hewn into shape with stone hatchets and the whole craft was finished by sanding it with an abrasive stone.[268] A similar procedure on a smaller scale was used to fashion wooden bowls and spoons and other such utensils. A bowl was first hollowed out by burning and then smoothed to a high polish with abrasive stones.[269]

Birch bark canoes were made by the Massachusetts, and Pring reports them in use by the Wampanoag.[270] The vessels or the material for them might have been obtained in trade, or, as one writer suggests, suitable-sized pieces of bark may have been achieved by piecing together the bark of birches that were stunted stragglers outside their normal range.[271] Birch bark canoes have the advantage of being light and easily transported over portages.[272] These canoes were joined by sewing, probably with bast fiber or something similar.[273] The seams were caulked with rosin from the pitch pine.[274] The vessels were strengthened by placing broad, thin ribs across the inside rather close together.[275]

Other Manufactures: The Indians also made glue of a combination of deer antler and “fishes sounds”.[276] Its use is mentioned for fletching arrows.

STRUCTURES

Architecture: There were two basic architectural styles used by the Wampanoags, both variations on a single structural type: A framework made of poles—large ends set into the ground, smaller ends bent to meet each other and lashed together—along with a series of horizontal elements that crossed the uprights at regular intervals and a covering of bark or woven mats. The smaller of the two styles was round in floor plan, and basically hemispherical in shape.[277] The larger type was oblong or oval in its floor plan, the side framework being two rows of parallel poles, retaining the rounded proof pattern.[278]

Dwellings: Both styles of house were used as dwellings; which one was used depended upon the season of the year. The larger house was a winter dwelling, the type used when the various constituent families of a village met to live together for that season. Dimensions varied, depending upon the size of the group that was living in the house.[279] They are described as being about thirty feet wide and ranging from fifty to one hundred feet in length.[280] Each family unit that lived in the house had its own fireplace, and a smoke hole was left in the roof over each of these.[281] There was a door at each end of the house.[282]

During the summer, when the Wampanoags were engaged in gardening, ocean fishing, and shellfish collecting, the smaller, round house was used. This is the sort of house, probably occupied by one or two nuclear family units, that early explorers saw strung out along the New England coast.[283] The size of the house varied according to the number of people to be fit in. Fifteen to twenty feet would probably be a good estimate of average diameter.[284]

The fireplace was located in the center of the floor, and above it was a smoke hole about one and a half feet across, which had a mat to cover it when the wind was strong.[285] Doorways were low—about a yard high—and had a mat or bark covering.[286] The location of the door was shifted as the wind changed; several panels were left with detachable coverings for this purpose.[287] Some Indians got boards and nails from the English and made doors and bolts for their wigwams after the fashion of the colonists. Both kinds of doors were fastened at night or if the family were leaving for a journey. In the latter case, the last one to leave fastened the door from the inside and left the house via the smoke hole.[288]

House frames for both styles of house were lashed together. One material mentioned for this use was walnut bark.[289] The outer covering of the house was either bark or matting. The mats were made of coarse grasses such as flagg or bulrush by sewing or weaving.[290] The bark used for house coverings was birch or chestnut.[291] It was removed from the trees when the “sap was up”. Sheets of green bark were placed under heavy logs to keep them from curling while they dried.[292] Bark-covered houses were considered to be warmer and preferable to those covered with mats.[293]

Bark covering is mentioned as being customary for summer houses of the Narragansetts.[294] Probably bark covering was the rule for winter village longhouses, since it was warmer. For groups dwelling along the coast and on Cape Cod, mat covering is most frequently mentioned.[295] Portability rather than warmth was likely the important factor in “summer” house coverings, since they also had to serve as covering for the hunting house in the fall and the fishing house in the spring. For this reason, mats were probably preferred over bark for summer houses. House frames were left standing when the family moved, and they were re-used the next year.

These houses were largely both dry and warm. There was a second layer of matting made of bulrushes on the inside of the house for added insulation. Since they were small and the fire was always burning, they were quite smoky, especially when the smoke hole and the door were closed against the elements. At such times the people inside often had to lie close to the floor in order to breathe properly.[296]

Other Structures: The Wampanoags had several other kinds of structures. Unfortunately, detailed descriptions of these are for the most part nonexistent.

It is reported that the houses of chiefs were different from the ordinary dwelling. They were larger, and finer mats were used for their walls.[297] Also different was the hunting house, which served as a base of operations for the fall hunting season. It provided shelter and a place to store the paraphernalia used in hunting.[298] Available data on construction tells only that they were of a more temporary nature than the regular dwelling house and that “barks and rushes” were used in the building.[299] Another structure was the dance house, built for ceremonial occasions. This was a longhouse measuring as much as one or two hundred feet.[300]

Other outbuildings in the settlement included: watch houses in the corn fields, menstrual huts, and sweat houses.[301] Of these, there is some information on the structural details of the sweat houses. They were commonly constructed by excavating a cave into the side of a hill. Sometimes an earth-covered extension was built out from the side of the cave, forming a structure that altogether measured about eight feet in diameter and four feet in height. The door covering was a blanket or a skin. The sweat house was placed as near as possible to a stream or lake, so that the bathers could plunge themselves into cold water at the termination of the bath. Heat was provided by a pile of stones heated on a fire.[302]

EQUIPMENT AND MAINTENANCE
OF BUILDINGS

The furnishings of Wampanoag houses were simple. This was necessary because of the Indians’ mobile life. All household equipment, including the covering of the house itself, had to be carried from camp to camp by the women of the household.

The interiors of houses were lined with bulrush matting. This was decorated with painting or “embroidery”.[303] Beds were family-sized—about six to eight feet across.[304] They were raised a foot to a foot and a half off the ground.[305] Forked sticks were set into the ground to hold poles, across which planks were laid.[306] Rush mats served as the mattress, and the sleepers covered themselves with skins, dressed with the hair left on.[307] Such a bed served the entire family and any visitors they might have.

The remainder of the furnishings consisted mainly of the various containers used for storage, cooking, and food service.[308] Cooking pots were sometimes made of clay, but if possible iron, brass, or copper kettles were obtained from the Europeans, since these were not so easily broken.[309] Birch bark pails were used as water containers, while various sizes of bags and baskets served to store food.[310] Carved wooden bowls, plates, and spoons were also part of the furniture, and some milling equipment probably occupied an indoor place.[311]

Indoor fires were always kept burning.[312] Fuel was either what windfalls could be gathered or an occasional larger tree which was cut and dragged in to be fed into the fireplace by degrees.[313] Over the fireplace, which was a simple hearth made of field stones, there was often a square frame of sticks, supported on forked branches.[314] Pots were hung from this framework. There was almost always a pot of boiling food over the fire, or else there was meat suspended on a stick whose end was buried in the ground.[315] Drying fish or meat was also kept in the house at times—to benefit from the fire when the weather outside was damp. Bundles of rushes, bast fiber, hemp, and the like for making mats and baskets probably would have about completed the inventory of household goods, save for personal possessions and tools.[316]

SETTLEMENT

Descriptions of village layouts, locations and sizes are virtually nonexistent. What information there is, along with some suggested interpretations, is offered as follows:

Both Champlain’s map and drawings of Wampanoag houses at Plymouth harbor suggest that the summer coastal settlements were laid out with each family’s house (or in some cases, probably each wife’s house) being located amid or beside its field.[317] Average field size was probably about one acre.[318] Drawings made by Champlain show fields fenced with parallel poles placed upright in the manner of a low stockade.[319] It was in these summer villages that the Wampanoags spent the most time during the year.[320] Actually, a family might make one or two moves during the summer, although staying in the same general area. When the fields planted later in the season were too far away for convenience, the family would move into another house near the field they were currently cultivating. Another resident of southern coastal New England, the flea, sometimes prompted a shift in residence during the summer. Fleas lived in the dust in the houses, and when they became unbearable an Indian family would move to a fresh dwelling.[321]

Reports of visitors to the southern New England coast prior to the plague give the impression that settlements of the “summer village” type were strung out all along the coast.[322] Settlements apparently were variable in size.[323] Writers who made this observation may have been looking both at actual variation in total group size and at seasonal variation in population concentration and dispersal. The most concentrated settlements were the winter villages.[324] A longhouse in one of the winter villages might shelter 40 or 50 people; there is no indication as to the number of longhouses that might have been found in such a village.[323]

Fall hunting encampments were, like the summer settlements, dispersed. Men moved onto the lands to which they had the hunting rights. Since more land was needed for hunting than farming, the spread of dwellings would have been much thinner. As for the spring fishing camps, it is known only that large numbers of people gathered at them; sources give no hint of settlement pattern.

ENERGY AND POWER

The principal source of light and heat for the Wampanoags was the same fire over which they cooked their meals. Additional light was sometimes provided by torches. One variety was made of birch bark and was used in night fishing.[324] Pine splints also served as torches, used for lighting the interiors of houses.[325]

Both percussion and friction methods of fire-making were used. For kindling fire by percussion the Indian carried with him a small pouch containing the proper materials for striking a light—a piece of spongy dry wood for tinder and stones for producing the spark. One stone was fastened onto the tinder stick to more surely catch the spark when it fell.[326]

Aside from fire for heat, light, and cooking, and occasional use of the sail, no naturally occurring sources of energy and power were controlled by the Wampanoags.

COMMUNICATION

The Wampanoags did not use any mechanical devices, such as whistles or drums for sending messages. Instead, they used their voices to call out information. When news had to be transmitted beyond shouting distance, a messenger was sent. If he had trouble locating his destination he would give a shout when he thought himself a mile or so away, and answering calls would guide him to the village he sought.[327]

Since they had no system of writing, all information that was to be passed on to other people, whether news of the day or tribal tradition, had to be memorized. To help in this task pre-literate societies sometimes use mnemonic devices. The Wampanoag had such a practice. Along the side of trails, near the place where some event of historical significance had occurred, they dug small holes, about a foot deep and a foot wide to mark the spot. These were meticulously re-excavated when they seemed to be filling in. As a Wampanoag passed through his country the sight of these markers reminded him of the stories they represented. Thus reminded, he would tell them to others.[328]

EXCHANGE

Gift Giving: Dances were held periodically, and at these the dancers would dole out presents such as wampum, to the spectators. Each man who was to dance would take his turn at it, giving away his possessions bit by bit until he had no more to give and was exhausted from dancing.[329]

At the Nickomo feast, held in the winter, the person giving the feast, besides providing food for perhaps hundreds of people (the size of the guest list depended upon what one could afford to pay for) presented goods and money to his guests.[330] Upon receipt of the gift, the guest would call out three times an invocation for the prosperity of his host.[331]

Trade: The several groups of Indians of southeastern New England traded among themselves in pottery vessels, wooden bowls, bows, arrows, pipes, shell money, stone bowls, skins, and food products of the hunt and the fields.[332] The manufacture of some of these items appears to have been specialized according to local group. That is, the women of one locality seem to have made cooking pots, and these were traded to the women of other groups.[333] Wooden bowls seem to have been the specialty of the Wampanoags. Soapstone pipes and bowls were produced by the Narragansetts and were traded north at least to Cape Cod.[334] At a time that was probably early in the seventeenth century the Narragansetts also took over the production of wampum for the region. Craftsmen spent the summer collecting suitable shells and the winter making the beads.[335] Trade in furs among Indian groups was not highly developed prior to the arrival of Europeans. It seems to have been mainly a matter of trading for kinds of skins that were scarce or finer than those in one’s own territory.[336] Food was probably traded according to need. It was also traded on the basis of geographical location, coastal tribes exchanging with interior tribes.[337]

The arrival of Europeans in the New World provided a great trade stimulus. The major trading interest between Indians and Europeans was the fur trade. Here coastal dwelling Indian groups such as the Wampanoags took the advantage. Being first to meet the Europeans, they quickly established themselves as go-betweens in the trade, and besides doing trapping of their own, they traded for the furs of inland tribes, which they then traded to the Europeans for a profit.[338] The fur trade caused increased emphasis upon hunting and trapping. Since it was more profitable to trade skins than to wear them, the fur trade was a force that encouraged Indians to adopt European textiles and dress.

The fur trade also was responsible for the introduction of wampum into Wampanoag culture. Wampum, used as money, was a trait belonging to Indian groups to the south. Purple wampum may have first originated on Long Island.[339] When the Dutch settled New Netherland, they found it a convenient medium of exchange and adopted it. The regular use and production of wampum found its way north to the Narragansetts, but it did not become popular with the Wampanoags until after 1627, the year in which the Dutch first brought wampum to Plymouth and suggested its virtues to the English settlers there.[340] Once its value was appreciated, Indians of the Plymouth area began to make it also.[341] Within the next twenty years, wampum as ornament and money became ingrained in Wampanoag culture.

Purple wampum was double the value of white. Wampum was reckoned in value by count, 360 white beads equalling a fathom, which was worth five shillings. This number of beads might exceed or fall short of a fathom in linear measure, but the number of beads rather than actual length was the important criterion.[342] The value of wampum, however, was based on the market in furs.[343] After 1648 this market dropped, and after that date a 5-shilling “fathom” of wampum had to consist of 480 white beads. In the period immediately prior to King Philip’s War the use of wampum as currency declined.[344]

Not all trade was in terms of skins and wampum. These were basic but not the exclusive goods in circulation. Guns and alcohol were popular items, introduced onto the market chiefly by the French—much to the distress of the English colonists and missionaries. Corn was also much involved in New England commerce.[345] Settlers traded corn with the Indians, according to the needs of each in a particular year. The Pilgrims at Plymouth traded corn to Indians in Maine for furs, although this pattern came to be replaced by an exchange of furs for wampum.[346]

LABOR

The basic division of labor was between the sexes. Certain tasks were those of women; certain others were those of men—neither did the work of the other. Apparently there were also individual craft specialty avocations, in terms of tribe or local group. That is, besides doing all the tasks that were necessary every day to produce food, clothing, and shelter, some people also made bowls, pottery, pipes, etc. It is not known, however, which people (i.e. a few individuals or almost everyone) within the group made these things.

The tasks of women centered about the home and fields. Theirs was the job of building the house. They set up the poles, made the mats to cover them, and fastened on the covering. When the family moved they took down the mats and carried them on their backs to the next homesite, where they were put onto the family dwelling in that place.[347] The woman did all the tending of the crops—she planted them, weeded them, saw that they were guarded from birds, harvested them, processed them, and stored them. She also made the various containers in which they were stored. Whichever of these products were to be carried to their next camping spot she also carried.[348]

The various collecting activities were the woman’s job—gathering shellfish for food and to bait her husband’s line, collecting roots, berries, and seeds, and also gathering the various raw materials needed for making bags and baskets.[349] When fish or game was captured by the man of the house he left the kill where it had fallen and sent his wife to fetch it in. Having collected the game, the woman skinned it, prepared the meat and dressed the hide, which she might then make into clothing or some household article.[350] Besides these things women had the job of motherhood. Along with the household goods, the baby rode on his mother’s back when the family moved.[351] Women were valued as highly productive members of the community. Bride-price is one institution that emphasizes their importance. The more women there were in a group, the more prosperous it was considered to be. In war, female captives were prized. A wife who wanted to leave her husband could run away to the enemy and be welcomed.[352]

The business of men was to hunt for game, catch fish, and provide protection for the weaker members of the village.[353] Raising tobacco was an exclusive activity of men. Men made and maintained their hunting and war weapons. They also manufactured many of the household tools and utensils.[354] Woodworking in general was the province of men: they carved spoons and dishes; they made canoes; they cut and shaped the poles for houses; they cut down trees to make new farm land; they constructed fortifications.[355]

Certain tasks were performed by groups of people from the larger community. One of these was breaking ground for spring planting, Williams writes that “All the neighbours men and Women forty, fifty, a hundred &c., joyne, and come in to help freely”.[356] Hunting by drive, fishing of some kinds, and the building of fortifications were also communal projects, as was war.[357]

Children, as soon as they were old enough, imitated the tasks of the similar-sexed parent. Toy bows and arrows and miniature pots were among their playthings. Children were useful for help in the fields at such tasks as weeding and keeping away birds. Men who were too old to hunt might also assist in the agricultural activities, if they wanted to.[358] Older women whose families were grown no doubt helped take care of toddlers so that mothers could do things outside the house such as gardening.

TRAVEL AND TRANSPORT

The Wampanoag had two means of travel available to him—going on foot or by canoe. Likewise, for the transport of his belongings and any trade goods he could use his canoe or his back.

Travel on foot through the forests was difficult, owing to the dense growth of bushes and low trees. There were paths worn along regular routes, but hunters had to traverse the woods. Early observers reported that in order to ease movement through the woods the Indians periodically set fire to the woods and burned out the undergrowth.[359]

The Wampanoags were efficient about the business of foot travel. They knew the country well and crossed seemingly trackless woods with accuracy of direction.[360] They trained at running from early childhood and a man could travel along all day at a jog-trot with ease.[361] The traveling costume was designed for a minimum of encumbrance on the journey—the normal dress being the breech clout. The traveler carried a bag of parched corn meal for sustenance and a pouch of tobacco, along with flints and pipe. He either wore or carried his moccasins. A quiver of arrows hung over his left shoulder, with the end resting in his right hand. In the left hand the runner carried his bow.[362] A small quantity of corn sustained him during the day, and by night he would seek shelter among friends of another village, or if alone he would kindle his own fire and dine on corn meal and water.

For water travel, either the birch bark or the dugout canoe was used. The bark canoe was probably preferred for travel on inland waterways, since portages could be made with greater ease, owing its lesser weight.[363] Birch bark canoes were said to be difficult to keep from capsizing. The Wampanoags, however, were skilled in the use of these bark boats, and they are described as venturing out in rough coastal waters.[364] They were strong swimmers and quite prepared to rescue themselves in case of mishap. The canoeist knew how to right his craft while swimming alongside and scramble in again.[365] Canoes were usually propelled by paddles.[366] However, the occasional use of sails is noted. A pole served for the mast and a skin robe or two for canvas.[367]

RECREATION

Recreation took two basic forms: sporting contests and gambling. Both were spectator sports as well as activities for the participants. The only team sport was a game that the English observers dubbed “football”. The ball was about the size of a handball. The game was played on long sandy beaches, the goal posts set a mile apart. If the rules followed the same form as those in other areas of North America where the game was played, the object was to get the ball over the goal without using one’s hands. The game might go on for two days before one goal was made, in which case the spot of play was marked at the end of the day and the game resumed there on the following day. When one tribe played against another the goal posts were hung with a great deal of wealth in wampum and other goods to go to the team that won. Players left their weapons in a common heap before play began and painted their faces as for war.[368] Before the game, men from the opposing teams met and shook hands. If the Wampanoag version of “football” was comparable to that in other places where the game was played, it was rough, and broken bones were not uncommon. In the course of a game players wrestled for possession of the ball and might be dunked in the ocean. Despite the vigorous play, however, tempers were seldom lost, and quarrels were rare. Great multitudes of people gathered for these games; women and children provided a noisy audience, calling out praises to their favorite players. When the play had ended, all joined for a great feast.[369]

Other sporting contests matched individual skills in archery, swimming, and running. Again, the contestants might be members of opposing tribes and the match one of great public interest. Marksmanship with bow and arrow was keen. The bowman held the arrow between his thumb and forefinger. In one form of shooting match the archer shot at his opponent, who would try, usually with success, to dodge the arrows. This was considered good practice for war.

European observers remarked that the Indians were excellent swimmers. Their style was designed for endurance, approximating what we would call a side stroke.[370] Children learned to swim while very young. Like swimming, running was a matter of balancing endurance against speed; the runner had to be able to keep jogging along easily for a day or more.[371]

Gambling was less active but no less competitive. Two types of gambling games were played. One, called Puim, was played with 50 or 60 reeds, each about a foot long. These were shuffled and dealt out to the players in such a way that different numbers fell to each; whoever had the most was counted ahead. A man that was a skillful player at this game wore some of the reeds through his ear as a challenge to anyone who might like to try to beat him.[372]

The other game was called Hubbub. It involved placing five bone dice, painted black on one side and white on the other, in a wooden platter, hitting the platter hard on the ground to make the dice jump up, and betting on the outcome of the color combination.[373] When this game was a contest between communities, a special arbor was built for the players who represented each group. Four poles of 16 to 20 feet high were set into the ground in a square to make this structure, and it was draped with the large quantity of wampum that was bet on the game. Hundreds of spectators would be present at an inter-tribal contest, described as having been a solemn affair. The spectators would chant “Hub Hub Hub” as the dice were being thrown, and the noise carried for a quarter of a mile.[374]

Not all gambling was a great public spectacle. It was a common activity of men at all times. It was pursued with great diligence and for high stakes; a group of men might sit for twenty-four hours without interruption for sleep, drink or food, until all had systematically gambled away the totality of their possessions—including even their moccasins.[375]

Gamblers invoked supernatural good will, sometimes by carrying a rock crystal charm. These were thought to be pieces of thunderbolts.[376] Gambling was usually a serious undertaking. In most cases players parted company in peace, however occasional disputes arose which led to violence and might ultimately result in killings.[377]

ENTERTAINMENT

Occasions for entertainment were usually activities aimed at purposes other than mere diversion. Songs, dances, and even public games had a ceremonial cast to them. A close tie-in with magic and the manipulation or propitiation of the supernatural is suggested in most cases.[378]

At various times of the year great public gatherings were held, in which the members of several local groups met for feasting, dancing, and playing games. At least two such public gatherings were held each year. One was in the spring, when large numbers of people had already congregated at certain fishing places.[379]

The other time of general public congregation was in the fall at harvest time. A dance house was built for the occasion. Dances were held at night, sometimes continuing for a week with the participants sleeping during the daytime. Both men and women gathered as spectators in the dance house; they sang accompaniment while the dancers performed one at a time. As he danced, the dancer would hand out money, knives, clothing, and the like to the needier members of the audience. When one dancer had given all he had, another would follow him, and so on.

Besides the great public gatherings, there were smaller private gatherings for various purposes.[380] One sort, to be discussed later, was to call for supernatural aid. Another was the Nikomo feast, held in the winter by members of a family for a select group of guests.[381] The host would give away as much of his wealth as he could to those who attended the feasting and dancing.[382]

Another favorite type of entertainment was story-telling and oratory. People listened with rapt attention to news and speeches. The discourse of one man might go on for an hour or two, while a large audience listened and smoked in silence; the manner of presentation was dramatic and accompanied by a great deal of gesture.[383]

The music which accompanied dances was provided mainly by singing.[384] Sometimes dances were accompanied by beating on the ground with sticks or hands along with muttering, humming and singing, but aside from these there were no musical instruments among the Wampanoags.[385]

The dances themselves are described as being “vehement in their motion”. At some dances a single dancer would perform; at others a few men and women would dance together.[386] Larger numbers of performers participated simultaneously in war dances.

PROPERTY

Adapted as they were to a mobile existence, the Wampanoags did not own large numbers of personal possessions judged by our standards. A typical list of an individual’s possessions would probably include his clothing, whatever tools he used from day to day, and his “wealth” in the form of wampum, skins, and the like. Even adding in such personal possessions as pipes and jewelry, the amount of property in this class would not have been large. At least some of this property was buried with its owner at his death.[387]

Land and the right to use it was apparently owned by the sachem. The boundaries of territory owned by a particular sachem were well defined, and from this land he allotted certain parts of it to his followers for their use. Not much is known, however, of the basis of land allotment.[388]

The sachem retained certain rights over the land used by his followers. When a deer was shot in his territory he was due the forequarters. He was also to be given the skins of deer taken in water that was in his territory. An annual tribute of food was given him by all the people, in return for, among other things, the use of his property.[389]

TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION

In regard to the subdivision of Wampanoag territory, Vaughan offers the following statement:

Anthropologists recognize nine subdivisions on the mainland, an additional four on Martha’s Vineyard, and several others scattered throughout the offshore islands and coastal promontories. The mainland sub-tribes were generally quite cohesive, largely because of the strong leadership offered by Massasoit and his immediate heirs. The leading Wampanoag sachems kept their principal headquarters at Pokanoket (now Bristol Rhode Island)....[390]

The actual organization of the territory into political units is difficult to discover from information recorded during the seventeenth century. Ideally, there would have been a sachem over each of the Wampanoag subdivisions and under him various sub-sachems who exercised some authority over more localized areas.[391] Probably, as the passage by Vaughan suggests, true organization on a “tribal” basis was an ephemeral thing.[392]

When a leader arose who could attract and hold the loyalty of the various subdivisions of the Wampanoags, then he came to exercise some authority beyond whatever tract of land would have been considered his “territory”—that is, the land which he had the right to allot. Massasoit was such a leader. He controlled a certain territory but also commanded the support of other sachems and received gifts from them as tokens of their loyalty.[393] The absolute authority of a tribal leader like Massasoit was solid only as long as he could keep his followers in agreement with him, and dissension was not unexpected.[394] Upon the death of a sachem, there was probably considerable shuffling and re-shuffling of territorial affiliation.

GOVERNMENT

The chief Wampanoag official was known as the sachem. The same official was also sometimes called sagamore. The office was hereditary through the male line—that is, a man’s son would normally succeed him upon his death or retirement. There were some variations upon this arrangement, and occasionally wives, daughters, and nephews succeeded to the position of leadership. If the heir was too young to undertake the responsibility of leadership, the position was usually held for him until he was of age. The arrangements of regency in this event are not known. Usurpation of the sachemship did occur, and if the man who took the position away from the rightful heir could find support and proved a good leader, he could retain the position.[395]

The sachem oversaw the allotment of lands and collected tribute from his followers. This tribute was the source of his wealth. The more followers the sachem could hold, the greater his wealth, therefore people seeing his vast wealth would know he was a powerful sachem. He took pains to please his followers, since those who did not like his policies could leave and join with another sachem.[396] He provided for the poor of his domain and gave presents to his followers.[397] Probably some of the feasts recounted by European observers were given by sachems to express gratitude to loyal followers.

Several special practices were associated with the sachemship. The sachem might have several wives. The first wife (who was the “official wife”) had to be of chiefly descent. The sachem lived in a house that was more elegant than those of his subjects.[398] When strangers came to the territory they were lodged at the sachem’s residence. This allowed the sachem to display his hospitality and also gave him the opportunity to enquire into their business.[399]

A sachem made an annual tour of inspection of his lands, visiting and talking with people and generally evaluating the situation of his territory.[400] A formal tribute of corn was collected once a year, overseen by officials who were designated as pnieses. The corn was brought to a place near the residence of the sachem, and the pnieses officially informed him of the gift. He would then express gratitude verbally and by giving gifts to his people.[401]

The sachem alone did not decide upon the policy of the group. There were other individuals who had a voice of authority in important matters.[402] The pnieses functioned as a tribal council, without whose approval the sachem could not act in some cases.[403] In addition they were also war leaders and a personal bodyguard for the sachem when he went abroad. Old men were respected for their advice (which they frequently dispensed in long formal orations) and were consulted in decisions.[404] Likewise, a powow whose powers were respected and feared would have an influence upon the governmental sphere of tribal activities.[405]

The governmental structure also included “sub-sachems” with more local authority.[406] Their role was mainly one of attending to the needs of their own groups. Among their functions were the settling of quarrels and acting as general intermediaries between the local group and higher authority.[407]

LAW AND JUSTICE

Among the Wampanoags, and likewise with other primitive societies who lack full-time legal and judicial specialists, the business of punishing wrongdoers and settling disputes was often a matter of selecting the most expedient course of action in the current situation.[408] For certain sorts of cases, however, there were well-established patterns observed and recorded by the seventeenth century chroniclers.

The chief judiciary was the sachem. He also functioned as the jury, sometimes with the additional counsel of other wise men, and in most cases he carried out whatever punishment was decreed.[409] Regularly recognized crimes were robbery, adultery, murder, and treason. For theft, the first offense resulted in a degrading public rebuke. If the offender stole a second time, he was beaten by the sachem “with a cudgel on the naked back”. The third offense resulted in a more severe beating, and he “... hath his nose slit upwards, that thereby all men may both know and shun him”.[410]

Adultery was punished by the wronged party, who would beat the offender, sometimes to death—in which case his death could not be revenged. The adulterous wife was kept or sent away at the husband’s wish. If the husband was the offender, his wife might leave him, but there is no other form of punishment recorded.[411]

Death was the punishment for murder. The regular procedure was to bring the offender before the sachem, who would pass judgement. The condemned man was then blindfolded, compelled to kneel and was bludgeoned to death by the sachem. Revenge was eagerly sought by the kinsmen of a murdered man.[412] They might take matters into their own hands and seek out the offending party, especially if the formal channels of justice did not first offer them satisfaction.[413] This was more likely to happen when the suspect belonged to another tribe.[414] If he were a valuable man, his sachem might be reluctant to execute him.[415] In lieu of the actual offender, one of his close relatives might be executed for the offense.[416] It was also possible to escape retribution by purchasing forgiveness of the offended group of kinsmen if enough wampum or other goods could be given.[417]

Treason also was usually punished by death.[418] When the offender fled before his treachery was discovered, the sachem sent special messengers with his own knife to find and execute the guilty party. The head and hands were brought back to the sachem as proof of a mission accomplished.[419] This procedure was also used to dispatch suspected leaders of intrigues against the sachem when it was feared that a public execution might throw sentiment to the side of the traitor’s faction.[420]

Etiquette required that all punishments, whether beatings or death, were to be borne with a show of outward calm. If one were to cry out, show pain, or try to escape, it was considered to be an unspeakable disgrace.[421]

Serious disputes that could not otherwise be worked out might be settled by combat between the two parties involved. In this case, each man was armed with his bow and a quiver of arrows. They would cast lots for a choice of the tree to use as a shield. From behind their respective trees they would shoot at each other until one or the other was killed. The scars of wounds received in this kind of combat were displayed with a great deal of pride.[422]

Inter-tribal justice, as the preceding suggests, was of a dubious nature. If one tribe were wronged by a member of another, emissaries were sent to ask for compensation. Whether or not it was given was a matter up to the tribe of the offender. Satisfaction might involve taking the offender’s life or the payment of a fine to compensate for loss through theft or killing. If satisfactory reparations were not made the offended party usually tried to forcibly take the equivalent in lives or goods to what had been lost.[423]

SOCIAL PROBLEMS

Wampanoag society also had its problems of insanity, widows, orphans, old people, and poverty. Friends or relatives usually provided for those in need of care. If they could not, however, it was up to the sachem to see that the needy were sustained; it is said that no one in the tribe went unprovided for.[424]

SOCIAL STRATIFICATION

There were three basic divisions within Wampanoag society: (1) the sachem and members of the “royal family”; (2) ordinary members of the community; (3) resident non-members (generally captives of war) who acted as servants.[425] However, within these categories there was considerable difference in the wealth and importance of members. There were also statuses within the groupings that carried special implications, such as warrior, powow, wife of sachem, older man, etc.

There were certain visible signs of social standing in Wampanoag society. The person of wealth or noble birth wore zoomorphic tattoos on his face.[426] His house had mats of an especially fine quality.[427] He wore a lot of wampum and had it woven into caps and aprons to show his lack of immediate need for this money.[428] He could have more than one wife.[429] He might have servants to do household tasks, and his wife could have a nurse for the children.[430]

INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS

English observers of the Wampanoags were impressed with the hospitality the Indians showed toward one another.[431] Any visitor was provided with a share of whatever food the household had, even if provisions were low.[432] Regardless of when a guest arrived, the courteous thing to do was to first offer him food.[433] The guest was provided with a place to sleep—usually in the family bed. In the summer the visitor might be provided with a space by having a member of the household sleep outside.[434]

Hospitality can be linked to a basic cultural pattern of value placed on, and presumably prestige afforded by, generosity. The practice of giving away goods in a public display of generosity was previously discussed. By the same token, ingratitude was accounted the worst breech of manners. Not only did the donor thus lose his goods, but also the prestige of being acclaimed a generous man if his sacrifice was not noted by the proper thanks.[435]

The Wampanoags’ hospitable attitude also extended to the English, who were fed, sheltered, guided through the woods, and advised of the movements of strangers.[436] It would have been a great discourtesy for the English guests to have refused to join their Wampanoag host for a meal, even though they found some of the food un-palatable.[437]

Certain matters of protocol seem to have been highly formalized. A greeting gesture was to stick the tongue out as far as it would go and lick the hand from wrist to finger tips.[438]

When a visitor came calling to discuss a serious matter, the occasion began with solemn formality. He entered the house and sat silently by the fire. Remaining silent, he smoked a pipe of tobacco. Having finished his pipe the visitor presented his host with a gift. The host gratefully acknowledged the gift, and then the visitor explained his business in the course of a long speech.[439]

MARRIAGE AND FAMILY

When a man wished to marry he spoke first to the woman and then to her family. Permission of the sachem was also necessary.[440] The bride’s parents were paid a sum of wampum or other goods to compensate for the loss of their daughter, and the union was solemnized by the sachem.[441] A man might get help from his relatives to pay the bride-price.[442]

If a woman felt that she was being ill-treated or became displeased with her husband for some other reason she would leave him.[443] One way was to run away and join whatever tribe her husband’s group happened to be warring with at the time.[444] When a man wished to be rid of his wife, he sent her away from him. Adultery was one reason for divorcing a wife.[445] A woman with the reputation of an adulteress might not be able to find another man who would marry her; such women sometimes became prostitutes.[446]

Wampanoags were polygynous. When a man took additional wives, one, usually the first, remained as the chief or principal wife with some degree of authority over the other wives.[447] In actual practice, not many men had more than one wife at a time. Sachems, powerful powows, and men of rank and wealth might have additional wives; apparently not all of these chose to do so.[448]

There were two reasons given for having multiple wives. First, an additional worker made a more productive household.[449] Second, a man might take an additional wife after the birth of a child; sexual relations between husband and wife were prohibited until the infant was weaned, which might be a period of more than a year.[450]

It was not common for anyone to live alone. Single persons lived with their families, and widows, widowers, or divorced persons usually also lived with relatives until another marriage was made.[451]

REPRODUCTION

Expectant mothers did not vary their normal routine of heavy work. Observers of the period noted this practice and attributed to it the ease with which women were able to deliver children. In the case of a difficult birth, the services of the powow’s magic were sought.[452]

INFANCY AND CHILDHOOD

The few observations that were recorded suggest that the Wampanoags had a high birth rate and rather high infant mortality.[453] The high number of infant deaths may have been due in part to the fact that within three days after its birth the baby was being carried about on the mother’s back in all the tasks that she went about outside.[454] Moreover, the Wampanoag style of cradle board made no provision for a device to shield the infant’s face.[455]

A baby’s clothing consisted of a coating of grease and a beaver skin or other fur wrapping in which he was bound onto the cradle board. The child was tied so that his knees were drawn up against his stomach, then when the board was set down and leaned somewhere he would be in a sitting position.[456]

Babies were soothed by the lullabies of their mothers.[457] It is said that they were generally very quiet infants and cried little. The Wampanoags were extremely fond of their children, giving them a great deal of indulgence and affection.[458] Infants were not weaned until they were over a year old.[459] Such child-rearing practices resulted in children that were “sawcie, bold, and undutifull”, according to English eyes.[460]

EDUCATION

Education was probably for the most part informal. Children learned their adult roles by watching adult activities and by being encouraged in their attempts to copy. Such practical skills for survival as swimming were taught at an early age.[461] Little boys played at shooting toy bows and arrows.[462] Girls played with miniature cooking pots, and they also participated in the work of planting and tending the fields as soon as they were old enough.[463]

An education in the beliefs and values of the Wampanoag people was gained in part by listening to the stories told by parents and grandparents.[464]

INITIATION

The transition of young Wampanoags into adult status was marked by special observances. Boys and girls both underwent initiation ceremonies; there is almost no information of the nature of these observances for females.[465] For boys it was a lengthy process to finally achieve recognition as an adult member of the tribe. De Rasieres describes some of the aspects of Wampanoag initiation.

When there is a youth who begins to approach manhood, he is taken by his father, uncle or nearest friend, and is conducted blindfolded into a wilderness, in order that he may not know the way, and is left there by night or otherwise, with a bow and arrows, and a hatchet and a knife. He must support himself there a whole winter with what the scanty earth furnishes at this season, and by hunting. Towards the spring they come again, and fetch him out of it, take him home and feed him up again until May. He must then go out again every morning with the person who is ordered to take him in hand; he must go into the forest to seek wild herbs and roots, which they know to be the most poisonous and bitter; these they bruise in water and press the juice out of them, which he must drink, and immediately have ready such herbs as will preserve him from death or vomiting; and if he cannot retain it, he must repeat the dose until he can support it and until his constitution becomes accustomed to it so that he can retain it.

Then he comes home, and is brought by the men and women all singing and dancing, before the Sackima; and if he has been able to stand it all well, and if he is fat and sleek, a wife is given to him.[466]

Both boys and girls received new, adult names at the time of their initiation.[467]

MILITARY TECHNOLOGY

Military Organization: Although it is not known for certain, it seems likely that the groups of men called pnieses constituted an elite military society that provided leadership in battles as well as being a policy-making body. Boys with the proper characteristics—courage, strength, stature, endurance, honesty, discretion, and courtesy—were trained from childhood to endure hardships in preparation for becoming a pniese. When they were of the proper age they were initiated into the society in a ceremony which involved physical ordeal and supernatural experience.[468] Pnieses performed feats of great courage and boldness and were considered to be immune to wounds by enemy weapons. These were the leaders in battle—the men who carried long spears.[469]

Defensive Fortifications: Winter villages were often fortified against attack. Fortifications were pallisade and ditch constructions. A pallisade consisted of upright poles of some ten to twelve feet high, set into the ground as close as possible. On the inside a breast-high ditch was dug, and dirt thrown up against the base of the uprights provided further protection during combat. Spaces between the poles served as loopholes. The fort had one or two entrances, depending on its circumference. These were formed by overlapping the ends of the wall.[470]

Forts varied considerably in size, and probably there was also variation from the above structural specifications. Sizes ranged from enclosures of about fifty feet across to areas of several acres.[471] The smaller fortified areas were probably meant for the use of small groups when away from the main community, perhaps during the hunting season. Thick woods and swamps also served as refuge areas for women and children in wartime.[472]

Ordnance: Weapons consisted of bows and arrows, clubs, and tomahawks. Knives were used for taking trophies. War leaders carried long spears. When guns, swords and other European war machines had been introduced into North America, these also were used. Wampanoag fortifications were not so effective against the guns as they had been against bows and arrows.[473]

Uniform and Accoutrement: The uniform of the Wampanoag was his war paint, described in the following passage: “When they goe to their warres, it is their custome to paint their faces with diversitie of Colours, some being all black as jet, some red, some halfe red and halfe blacke, some blacke and white, others spotted with divers kinds of colours....”[474] In addition, wampum and other ornaments were worn into battle.[475]

WAR

Motivations which could lead to war were revenge, boundary disputes, and power struggles within groups.[476] The instigation for war might come from the sachem or from some group among the people; generally the agreement of the sachem and his council was required before war could be undertaken.

Dancing and oratory were part of the preparations for battle, serving to incite the warriors. The following passage describes the pre-battle ritual:

There was one that kneeled upon a deer skin, with the company around him in a ring, who kneeled, striking upon the ground with their hands and with sticks, and muttering or humming with their mouths. Besides him who kneeled in the ring there also stood one with a gun in his hand. Then he on the deerskin made a speech, and all manifested assent to it; and so they did many times together. Then they bid him with a gun go out of the ring, which he did; but when he was out, they called again; but he seemed to make a stand. Then they called the more earnestly, till he turned again. Then they all sang. Then they gave him two guns in each hand one. And so he on the deerskin began again; and at the end of every sentence in his speaking they all assented, and humming or muttering with their mouths and striking upon the ground with their hands. Then they bid him with the two guns go out of the ring again, but he made a stand. So they called him with greater earnestness; but he stood reeling and wavering as if he knew not whether he should stand or fall, or which way to go. Then they called him with exceeding great vehemency, all of them, one and another. After a little while he turned in, staggering as he went, with his arms stretched out, in each hand a gun. As soon as he came in, they all sang and rejoiced exceedingly a while, and then he upon the deerskin made another speech, unto which they all assented in a rejoicing manner....[477]

The Wampanoags were skillful both in the use of their weapons and in avoiding enemy fire. In the woods, where most fighting seems to have been done, warriors used trees for cover. In the open, bark shields were used to ward off arrows, and the fighters were skillful at dodging out of the way.[478] As a rule, when a warrior had run out of arrows he left the battle.[479] As a result, mortality was not high, judged by the standards of European wars of the period. In a large battle, however, as many as twenty men might be lost.[480]

The tactic of surprise was used whenever possible. The occasion of a storm that would drive the enemy indoors was a good opportunity for attack; warriors could enter the village unnoticed and strike down the foe in their houses before they could organize for defense.[481]

Sometimes battles took place on the water. One reporter describes seeing thirty or forty canoes full of men engaged in a pitched battle.[482]

Warriors who were killed, or wounded so they could not escape, had their heads, hands, and feet hacked off and carried away as trophies.[483] Scalping was a practice that appeared late in the seventeenth century; it may have been a European introduction.[484] Most male captives faced a death by torture. Female captives were kept alive; it is likely that they were adopted into the tribe as wives or servants.[485]

IDEAS ABOUT NATURE AND MAN

From childhood the Wampanoags learned to make certain observations of the stars, planets, and of the seasons and weather.[486] The time of day was measured by the height of the sun in the day and by the moon and stars at night.[487] Longer spans of time were kept account of in terms of the moon and of “summers” and “winters”.[488] Reckoning according to the moon, they had thirteen months, each with its own name.[489] Many of the stars were named; the north star was called Maske, meaning “bear”.[490] Winds were named according to their direction; of these there were seven to nine.[491] By observing the winds and the sky the Wampanoags made fairly accurate weather predictions.[492]

SICKNESS

The Wampanoag practice of sweat bathing was thought to have both therapeutic and preventive benefits. First the sweat house was heated by putting a great number of hot stones inside. Then the naked bathers entered and the door was stopped up. The bathers sat inside, smoking their pipes for as long as they could bear the heat—perhaps an hour or so. The sweat bath was then terminated by a dash outside and a plunge into the cold water of a nearby lake or stream. Sweat bathing was said to cleanse and refresh the body and thus be good for general health. It was also used to cure diseases, sometimes in combination with other types of remedies.[493]

Herbal remedies were used for their therapeutic effect on both diseases and wounds.[494] The Wampanoags are said to have had great skill in the use of such remedies.[495] The Wampanoag theory of herbal remedies was that each symptom had a specific herbal cure.[496] For example, the cure for toothache was “... a certaine root dried, not much unlike our ginger”.[497] A different herb would be used to relieve stomach aches, and so on.

Wounds and diseases were also cured by magical means. Curing by magic seems to have been used in cases where the suspected cause of the illness was also magical. This malevolent magic was usually manifest in the form of an “evil spirit” put into the ailing person’s body to cause him pain. Healing by magic was the special province of the powow.[498]

When a person was quite ill, all his friends and relatives would crowd into his wigwam and gather around him. If someone could not be there in person, he sent a representative.[499] This audience joined in the powow’s chanting at certain points during the ritual.[500] Wood gives the following description of magical curing procedure:

... after violent expressions of many a hideous bellowing and growning, he makes a stop, and then all the auditors with one voice utter a short Canto; which done, the Pow-wow still proceeds in his invocations sometimes roaring like a Beare, other times groaning like a dying horse, foaming at the mouth like a chased boar, smiting on his naked brest and thighs with such violence, as if he were madde. Thus will hee continue sometimes halfe a day, spending his lungs, sweating out his fat, and tormenting his body in this diabolicall worship....[501]

Next the powow would suck on the afflicted part of the patient’s body and, being an expert at sleight of hand, pretend to remove an object—a small stone, or twig or the like—from the body and display it for all to see. This object, it was claimed, was the “evil spirit” that was the cause of the trouble. Sometimes it was thought that the powow from some other group had brought on the illness in the first place.[502]

Both men and women engaged in curing activities.[503] It may have been that there was a division between the use of herbal and magical cures, with magically caused illness and magical cures being the province of male powows, and functional illness being cured by specific herbal formulas which were non-magical in their effect and which were the province of women skilled in this art. This was true of some other Northeastern Algonquian groups. Where such a division occurred, there was little or no infringement of one group on the methods that were the property of the other. When symptoms did not respond to the normal herbal treatment, or when they were recognized to be supernatural in origin from the start, magical cures were resorted to.[504] Curers were paid well for their efforts, and those who were successful became wealthy and influential members of the community.[505]

If a patient recovered, his friends and relatives would send corn and other sorts of gifts to him, and at a certain time a feast (called commoco) would be held in honor of the recovery.[506] Sometimes in asking the supernatural to remove a sickness it was necessary to provide gifts as a sacrifice.[507] This seems to have been a practice resorted to in particularly grave situations. In one instance, when several people had died in an epidemic, the entire village gathered to perform a curing ritual to drive out the sickness. The wealthier people danced and gave away great quantities of wealth to the poor; ultimately a messenger was sent to intercede in person with the supernatural.[508] Epidemics were greatly feared, and in the case of a known contagious disease, the usual practice of friends and relatives coming to visit the sick was not carried out. In such instances often the entire village would be abandoned.[509]

DEATH

Death and the dead were greatly feared by the Wampanoags.[510] Theories as to the causes of death are little noted by the European chroniclers; there was, however, the idea that the death of a child could result from supernatural anger with the parent.[511] After death the “good” were thought to go to the southwest, where they would lead an idyllic existence. Less fortunate people were doomed to wandering about aimlessly.[512]

Burial prepared the deceased for his journey to the southwest. Hazards were expected along the way (a large dog is one that is mentioned.)[513] For this reason, and because the afterlife was expected to be like earthly existence, the equipment of life—weapons, wampum, ornaments, pots, and the like were buried along with the dead.[514] In the case of children, the parents might make gifts of special ornaments and treasures and put them into the grave.[515]

One specially appointed person, “commonly some wise, grave, and well-descented man” had the job of preparing the corpse for burial and committing it to the earth.[516] Woven mats were used to line the grave. Boards might be placed in as lining for the grave of an important person, likewise a greater wealth of possessions and richer covering of mats indicated a person of higher station.[517] The body was placed into the grave in a sitting position—arms were drawn across the chest and knees were bent up; it was covered with a mat.[518] To mark an important grave a skin mantle might be hung nearby and left there until it rotted.[519] It was also reported that monuments were raised over the graves of great men, but there is no indication of what these might have been.[520]

There was considerable mourning and display of grief for the dead. Both men and women painted their faces black to signify grief.[521] Women would paint their faces as soon as an illness appeared to be serious, but men did not do so until death had occurred.[522] At the moment of death the assembled spectators would begin wailing and lamenting, men and women alike.[523]

Adults were buried in or near the house, after which all the mats were taken down from the house, leaving only the frame remaining, and it was abandoned forever.[524] The company of friends and relatives would gather around the corpse as it lay at the grave’s edge and lament copiously.[525] They would continue to mourn thus for many days; the length of mourning increased with the importance of the deceased. In the case of a very important person, such as a sachem, the period of mourning might last for a year.[526] The black face paint was worn throughout the period of mourning, and it was often seen to be caked by tears.[527] Upon the death of a child, the father might cut off his proud long hair and inflict wounds upon his body.[528] The anniversary of the death was kept by a brief period of renewed mourning, the face again being blackened.[529] The name of a deceased person was not to be mentioned again. If anyone living had a similar name, he would change it.[530]

Concern was also shown for the family of the deceased. Friends would often visit offering words of consolation “... which they express by stroking the cheeke and head of the father or mother, husband or wife of the dead”.[531] Widows or widowers, left then without a house, would take up residence with a related family or perhaps move about among the homes of their relatives for a time, where they were comforted.[532]

RELIGIOUS BELIEFS[A]

The world of the Wampanoags was well-populated with supernatural beings and forces. Of these, one was a sort of generalized power, called Manitou.[533] Many early observers of the Indians of northeastern North America, where this concept is widespread, developed the mistaken idea that “Manitou” referred to an anthropomorphic supreme being. Actually, Manitou is a force rather than a person. It could perhaps best be likened to that force for good luck that many Europeans think can be found in horse shoes, four-leaf clovers, etc. thus, when a Wampanoag performed an exceptional feat he was said to have Manitou, or supernatural power. Likewise, certain objects, animals, and physical features on the landscape were thought to have Manitou in them, because someone had had good luck right after seeing or touching them. This could have happened so far in the past that it was remembered only in mythology. Or, perhaps the whole incident was a vision in a dream.[534]

A related concept is something that can be called animal spirits.[535] These were supernaturals in animal form, who could interfere in the lives and fates of human beings. Whether the power of these animals was identical to Manitou is not known, and it is quite possible that the relationship was not too clearly worked out in the minds of the Indians either.

A great deal of emphasis was placed upon dreams.[536] A Wampanoag who wanted supernatural help could seek a dream in which one of the animal spirits would appear to him and agree to help him, often by becoming his guardian spirit.[537] He would then call upon this supernatural helper throughout his life for whatever aid its power enabled it to give. Crows and rabbits in particular represented animal spirits, and they were not supposed to be killed.[538]

Powows also had animal spirits that they obtained through dreams. Either the animal itself or the kind of supernatural power that the animal had (it is not possible to tell which from existing data) came to dwell within the powow. He could then send this spirit out to do his bidding.[539] Usually there were several such animal spirits dwelling within one powow.[540]

Also part of the supernatural world were the ghosts of the dead. They lingered near the camps of the living and caused trouble, often in the form of illness.[541]

The Wampanoags also had anthropomorphic supernaturals. One of these was Kiehtan, a high god who was responsible for the creation of the world and all in it, and who could influence the prosperity of the Wampanoags. He was called upon for plenty, victory, and general favor in various undertakings. His home was in the southwest, the place where spirits of the good went upon death.[542] According to some accounts this was also the place where other kinds of spirits lived.[543]

Another supernatural was Hobomock (Abamacho). The Europeans immediately identified this being with the Devil, because he had an association with snakes, seemed to be able to cause harm to people, and was often feared. Actually, he seems to have been capable of both help and harm; his role in the supernatural pantheon is not at all clear. Hobomock would actually appear to the more important Wampanoags, taking the form of an animal or bird, and most frequently a snake. He was called upon in time of sickness to cure people. One never dared to call upon Kiehtan in time of illness for fear it might have been he in the first place who sent the sickness as punishment. If the illness was sent by Kiehtan, however, Hobomock could not cure it.[544]

Mythology had it that people were made by Kiehtan (Kautantowwit). He first made a man and a woman out of stone, but, as he did not like them, he broke them into many pieces and proceeded to make another man and woman out of a tree. These he liked, and their progeny populated the earth.[545] Corn and beans were brought by the crow, who carried in one ear a kernel of corn and in the other a bean, which he had gotten from the field belonging to Kiehtan.[546]

The Wampanoags attributed a great deal of what happened to them in their daily lives to supernatural activity.[547] Sometimes it was hard to determine at once whether a condition resulted from “natural” or supernatural causes. A supernaturally caused illness, for example, would often go unrecognized until conventional herbal techniques proved of no avail in bringing relief. Bad luck and accidents were usually blamed on the supernatural.[548] Winning at games was considered to be done as a result of supernatural aid, which was invoked throughout the period of play. Bargaining, pleading, and threatening were all methods used to bring supernatural favor upon one’s activities and to dispel any unfavorable supernatural influences.

RELIGIOUS PRACTICES

In the event of war, drought, famine, and for some cases of sickness, ceremonial activities which constituted requests for supernatural aid were carried out.[549] To beg for rain, people from all localities of the tribe would gather at some high place and perform supplications until the drought was broken.[550] Other ceremonials were occasioned by a spirit of thanksgiving for peace, health, plenty, and prosperity.[551]

As nearly as can be told, ceremonial activity encompassing all of the above circumstances involved dancing and sacrifice of personal wealth to please the supernatural. The sacrifice of wealth might take either the form of gifts to the poor or actual destruction of property by casting it upon the fire.[552] This latter custom was carried out by the Narragansetts, and the more a man brought to burn up, the more he was esteemed. The Wampanoags said they did not cast goods into the fire, but they acknowledged this to be a powerful practice and attributed to it the Narragansetts’ salvation from the plague.[553] The seeking of supernatural assistance was highly pragmatic; if one supernatural source did not send the desired aid, another was tried until the proper combination was discovered.[554]

The Wampanoags placed a great deal of importance upon dreams. A bad dream was considered to be a threat from the supernatural, and a man awakening from one would fall to offering prayers of supplication. If the vision were especially ominous, a man might call in his friends to keep watch with him. He would offer them food, but he himself kept a fasting and wakeful watch for several days and nights.[555]

Among the Wampanoags, names had supernatural significance. “Obscure and mean persons amongst them....” had no names.[556] Probably such persons were resident non-members of the tribe and youngsters who had not yet undergone initiation. Once received, a name was a closely guarded piece of personal property. It was considered discourteous to refer to or call a person by his true name. Instead, a circumlocution or a substitute pronoun was used.[557]

ECCLESIASTICAL ORGANIZATION

The Wampanoags only religious practitioner was the powow. His role was that of intermediary between the humans and the supernatural.[558] When illness was thought to be of supernatural origin he was called in to determine the kind of force at work and to carry out the proper ceremonies to restore health.[559] For this work he received payment in advance. Should the patient not recover, his relatives were apt to be angry with the powow; they would demand the return of the fee and perhaps his life if they felt that deception had been involved.[560]

Certain of the powow’s activities were deliberately misleading. He often used tricks to help demonstrate his command of supernatural powers. A powow was said to be able to accomplish such feats as making water burn, turning ashes into green leaves in the winter, making ice appear upon water in the summer, or turning himself into a “flaming man”. His skill at sleight of hand aided in the working of some of these wonders.[561]

A man became a powow by having a dream in which he was promised the type of supernatural power that would make him a powerful religious practitioner.[562] The man announced this dream to others on the following day, and in the course of a two-day celebration it was proclaimed that he was a powow.[563] The success and competence of the new powow would be judged by his future performance.

APPENDIX

Tools and Appliances

This section contains a list of some Wampanoag tools and appliances described by early observers. Where processes of manufacture and methods of use are known and have not been more appropriately included in previous sections they will be found in the following pages. Basketry, clothing, and ornaments are thoroughly described elsewhere.

The descriptive notes are arranged in the following order: item, followed by use (where known), followed by material (where known), followed by any details of construction, etc., followed by references as to location of the data in the literature.

BOW: weapon and hunting: walnut or “wich hasell”; 5-6′ long, painted black and yellow; strung with twisted sinew thicker than European boxstrings of the time; effective range “six to seven score”. (Josselyn, p. 257; Bushnell, p. 675; Wood, pp. 97, 101; Howe, p. 71)

ARROW: weapon, hunting, fishing; shaft of “young elderne”; 18″ long; made with detachable tips, the point bound to a 6-8″ piece of wood, which is then inserted in a socket in the main shaft and held by binding; fletching of long, broad, black feathers of eagle, vulture, or kite, attached with glue and binding. (Wood, p. 100; Mourt’s Relation, p. 183; Howe, p. 71)

ARROW POINTS: stone—quartz (generally white), slate (Chapin, p. 3); metal—copper, iron, brass; triangular or “hart shaped” (Brereton, p. 43-44; Williams, p. 137; Wood, p. 100; Willoughby, pp. 237-39), bone (Willoughby, pp. 237-39); end of tail of horseshoe crab. (Howe, p. 120)

FISHING SPEAR: shaft wood; point stone (quartz—usually white—or slate) or metal—iron, copper, (Chapin, p. 3; Brereton, pp. 43-44; Williams, p. 137; Bushnell, p. 675)

LONG SPEAR: carried into battle by a chief and used for carrying back the heads of slain enemies; metal blade attached for point. (Wood, p. 95; Gookin, p. 152, Lechford, p. 120)

KNIFE: handle antler; blade stone (quartz, flint, or slate) or metal; hafted by insertion of the blade into sleeve cut in handle; handle might be decorated by incised lines; two holes drilled diagonally until they meet to form an opening provide for suspending cord. (Willoughby, p. 239-40, illustrated; Chapin, p. 30)

HARPOON: used in fishing. (Wood, p. 100-101; Williams, p. 137)

GAMING PIECES: playing Puim; small reeds of about a foot long; 50 to 60 make up a set. (Wood, p. 83)

GAMING PIECES: playing Hubbub; bone dice, painted black on one side, white on the other; sets of five. (Wood, p. 83)

GAMBLING TRAY: used in hubbub; carved and polished wood. (Wood, pp. 96-98)

BOWL OR DISH: eating stews, etc.; wood burls, including elm and maple; well smoothed and polished, sometimes with handle carved to represent animal. (Willoughby, p. 258; Mourt’s Relation, p. 144; Morton, pp. 158-59; Bushnell, p. 675)

PAIL: carrying water; birch bark; square, bail-type handle, two to three gallon capacity; made by “skillful folding” (probably sewn together). (Gookin, p. 151)

HAND BASKET: use not stated; “made of crabshells wrought together”. (Mourt’s Relation, p. 144)

CLAY POT: cooking; thin, about the same thickness as iron pots; sizes quart to gallon. (Morton, p. 158; Mourt’s Relation, p. 144; Wood, p. 75; Gookin p. 151)

STONE BOWLS: soapstone; with or without ears or handles; known examples are rather rough of finish. (Chase, p. 900; Chapin, p. 15)

KETTLE: cooking; iron, brass, copper. (Wood, p. 75; Gookin, p. 151)

DRINKING CUPS: unworked shell (Fulgur canaliculata); copper, broad and shallow (“skull-shaped”). (Willoughby, pp. 237-39; Brereton, pp. 43-44)

BOX: birch bark. (Bushnell, p. 675)

HOE: cultivating and preparing gardens; wood and clamshell. (Williams, p. 176; Wood, p. 87; Howe, pp. 116-17)

SPOON: eating stews, etc.; Wood (burls of elm, maple, or other), finely finished, handle often elaborately carved in openwork or other ornamental figures; Bone (one example), U-shaped, 104 × 41 mm, three small perforations in flat end for hafting; Deer antler; Sheet copper and brass (Willoughby, pp. 237-39, 258; Bushnell, pp. 675, 683-4; Gookin, p. 151)

LADLE: burl of elm, maple, or other. (Willoughby, p. 258; Gookin, p. 151)

SNOWSHOES: round, “bearpaw” type, rectangular weaving[B]; three crossbars; netting attached to frame by wrapping. The toe hole, characteristic of most North American snowshoes, is lacking. (Davidson, pp. 31-2, 96)

MOULDS: for casting pipes, buttons, small ornaments, shot and bullets of all sizes; slate or other suitable stone; both one and two piece. (Willoughby, p. 243-44; Bradford, p. 52)

CRADLE BOARD: wood (perhaps also bark); forked shaped ends, dimensions 2 × 1 feet; braided strap for tying on child; furs for covers. (Bushnell, p. 675; Wood, p. 108; Morton, p. 147)

TORCHES: as fishing lures and for lighting inside houses; birch bark or pitch pine; splints or cloven pieces bound into a bundle. (Bushnell, p. 675; Willoughby, p. 294)

FISH HOOKS: bone—one form consists of the shank bone of a fawn, ends cut off to make a tubular shape 120 mm. long; line is looped through the tube; catches by fish swallowing. Wood with a spear-shaped piece of bone attached at more or less right angle, producing a fang-shape; point lashed on with hemp. Iron (imported ready made from Europe). (Bushnell, p. 675; Howe, pp. 110-15; Wood, p. 100)

NET SINKERS: for keeping stationary net in place; stone. (Chapin, p. 11)

FISH DRYING SCAFFOLDS: no descriptions. (Wood, p. 107)

ROASTING SPIT: for cooking meat over the fire inside the house; stick of wood, notched at one end, other end sharpened to stick into ground. (Wood, p. 75)

BUTTONS: pewter, made by casting; decorated. (Illustrated in Willoughby, p. 243, fig. 131)

LARGE PIPES: carved wood, stone (probably soapstone), carvings to represent men and animals; 2 feet long. (Williams, pp. 72-3)

SMALLER PIPES: soapstone (made in imitation of the English style), pewter, clay, brass, combinations of these—stone with brass bound bowl, clay stem with bowl of copper. (Williams, pp. 72-3; Willoughby, pp. 243-4, 240; Chapin, p. 17; Brereton, p. 38)

PESTLE: for grinding; stone; one example with top carved to represent an animal’s head. (Bushnell, p. 675; Willoughby, pp. 237-9)

STONE MORTAR: containing material during grinding (corn specifically mentioned); sized from immovable boulder to a smaller portable style to cup size (for grinding pigments).

WOODEN MORTAR: used with stone pestle for corn and probably other uses similar to stone mortar; trough-shaped. (Bushnell, p. 675)

ADZE: woodworking; wood handle and stone head; head smooth and convex on one side, often double-grooved on the other side for hafting; sizes run from two to ten inches in length, also with imported European iron head. (Willoughby, 237-39)

AXE: woodworking; wood handle, stone head; differ quite markedly in weight, thickness, polish, workmanship, and size; approximately bi-symmetrical; large ones grooved to hold sinews that bind head to handle. Iron head; both axe and hatchet size (from Europeans). (Williams; p. 176; Chapin, pp. 6-7).

DRILLS: for beads; stone, later metal. (Williams, p. 176)

SCRAPERS: woodworking (probably something similar used in skin preparation); clam and oyster shell. (Wood, p. 102)

CHISEL: beaver incisor hafted onto some sort of handle. (Willoughby, pp. 237-39)

AWL: bone. (Willoughby, pp. 237-39)

NEEDLE: sewing mats together; bone (“splinter bone of a cranes legge”) half of the split rib of a deer. (Morton, p. 135; Willoughby, pp. 244-45)

BAG FOR CARRYING PARCHED CORNMEAL: leather; long pouch worn around the waist. (Wood, p. 76)

TOBACCO BAG: for carrying pipe and tobacco; worn hung down the back. (Williams; pp. 72-3)

QUIVER: contain arrows; woven bulrushes; length one yard; one is described as having a decorative band about one foot wide on the top and about six inches wide at the bottom of the quiver, in red diamonds and patterns of other colors. (Winslow, p. 307; Howe, p. 71)

CLUB: weapon. (Gookin, p. 152)

TOMAHAWK: weapon; wood handle with sharp stone fastened into it. (Gookin, p. 152)

SHIELD: bark. (Gookin, p. 152)

COMB: one example, made of moose horn, perhaps unique in shape, consisted of small set of teeth at the end of a very long handle. (Bushnell, p. 683)

DUGOUT CANOE: pine or chestnut; size variable—some 40-50 feet long will carry 20 people; others are about one and a half to two feet wide and twenty feet long; hollowed out of tree trunks. (Wood, p. 102; Gookin, p. 152)

BIRCH BARK CANOES: sizes probably various—one that would carry nine passengers was 17′ × 4′, weighing about 60 pounds; another had a seating capacity of five or six. Seams were closed by sewing “oziers or twigs” and pitched; ends were pointed, fore and aft, but the bow curved slightly upwards. Inside were thin, broad ribs. (Wood, p. 102; Pring, p. 58; Gookin, pp. 152-53)

CANOE PADDLES: ash or maple; lightweight, length about two yards, flat on the ends. (Pring, p. 58)

SAILS: used occasionally; mast of small pole; consisted of skins of the sort used for mantles, one or two of these used at a time. (Williams, p. 133)

TOYS: bow and arrow: bow of a stick and arrows of reeds; Pottery vessels (miniature). (Wood, pp. 97-98; Willoughby, pp. 237-39)

SCAFFOLD FOR HANGING POTS OVER FIRE: see p. 64

FIRE-MAKING KIT

FISHING LINE

FISHING NET

EUROPEAN IMPORTS: in addition to those already mentioned, the following items of European technology were obtained and used by the Wampanoags: tin cups; pails of tin and iron; wooden chests; glass bottles; weapons—guns, pistols, sword and rapier blades, hatchets, and axes. (Gookin, pp. 151-52; Mourt’s Relation, p. 144)

FOOTNOTES

[A] Observation by writers of the period tend to be heavily biased by their own intense interest in Christianity, making them less useful for ethnographic purposes than most of the contemporary comment. Therefore this section can be little more than a listing of a few of the traits that comprised Wampanoag religious beliefs.

[B] D. S. Davidson, “Snowshoes,” MEMOIR OF THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY, #6 (Philadelphia, 1937), pp. 31-2. “As the name implies, rectangular weaving consists of a series of warp and woof strands interwoven at right angles, in most cases in an over one under one fashion. Since embellishments in the forms of double strands, twists, and half hitches are often found, the term ‘rectangular’ has been selected as better suited than ‘plaiting’. This type of weaving is almost limited to North America. It is concentrated in Alaska and the Mackenzie region.... Elsewhere in North America it occurs sporadically.”

NOTES

[1] Alden T. Vaughan, NEW ENGLAND FRONTIER: PURITANS AND INDIANS 1620-1675, p. 54.

[2] “And though there be difference in a hundred miles’ distance of place, both in language and manners, yet not so much but that they very well understand each other. And thus much of their lives and manners.”; Edward Winslow, “Winslow’s Relation” in CHRONICLES OF THE PILGRIM FATHERS OF THE COLONY OF PLYMOUTH FROM 1602 TO 1625, Alexander Young, ed. pp. 366-67; also Roger Williams, A KEY INTO THE LANGUAGE OF AMERICA: OR AN HELP TO THE LANGUAGE OF THE NATIVES IN THAT PART OF AMERICA, CALLED NEW-ENGLAND, p. 20; Daniel Gookin, HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS OF THE INDIANS IN NEW ENGLAND, p. 149. Willoughby states that the Massachusetts, Wampanoags, Narragansetts, and Nipmucs, together with the Nontauks of Long Island formed a dialect group by themselves; Charles C. Willoughby, ANTIQUITIES OF THE NEW ENGLAND INDIANS, p. 276.

[3] Vaughan, p. 54.

[4] Gookin, p. 158.

[5] James Mooney, “The Aboriginal Population of America North of Mexico,” SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS LXXX (February 6, 1928), p. 3.

[6] Douglas Edward Leach, FLINTLOCK AND TOMAHAWK: NEW ENGLAND IN KING PHILIP’S WAR (New York, 1959), p. 1.

[7] Professor Demitri Shimkin, personal communication.

[8] Vaughan, p. 53.

[9] Emmanuel Altham, “Emmanuel Altham to Sir Edward Altham, September, 1623”, THREE VISITORS TO EARLY PLYMOUTH, Sydney V. James, Jr., ed. (Plimoth Plantation, 1963), p. 29; Gookin, p. 158.

[10] Altham, p. 29.

[11] Gookin, p. 158.

[12] Figures on Wampanoag population, unlike the case for several other New England groups, are not abundant. This is the only estimate found by the author; Leach, p. 1.

[13] Mooney, p. 3.

[14] Ibid.

[15] Vaughan, p. 28.

[16] In actual fact, exposure to the sun, the usual coating of grease, and an inevitable layer of dust must have altered skin color somewhat.

[17] Willoughby, pp. 230-31.

[18] Ibid.

[19] Ibid., p. 66. The Narragansetts’ name for the Englishmen was “knive men”; Williams, p. 176.

[20] Willoughby, p. 243.

[21] Ibid., pp. 243-44; Williams, pp. 72-73.

[22] William Bradford, HISTORY OF PLYMOUTH PLANTATION 1620-1647, II (Boston, 1912), pp. 52-53.

[23] For an example of the Indians’ sentiment toward the embrace of Christianity, the following passage from Wood: “... since the English frequented those parts, they daily fall from his the devil’s colours, relinquishing their former fopperies, and acknowledge our God to be supreame. They acknowledge the power of the Englishmans God, as they call him, because they could never yet have power by their conjurations to damnifie the English either in body or goods; and besides, they say hee is a good God that sends them so many good things, so much good corne, so many cattell, temperate raines, faire seasons, which they likewise are the better for since the arrivall of the English; the time and seasons being much altered in seven or eight years, freer from lightning and thunder, long droughts, suddaine and tempestuous dashes of raine, and lamentable cold Winters.”; William Wood, NEW ENGLAND’S PROSPECT (Boston, 1865), p. 94.

[24] M. K. Bennett, “The Food Economy of the New England Indians,” THE JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, LXIII (October, 1955), p. 395.

[25] John Elliot, quoted in Edward Winslow, “The Glorious Progress of the Gospel Amongst the Indians in New England,” Massachusetts Historical Society, COLLECTIONS, Ser. 3 IV (Boston, 1834), p. 81.

[26] Willoughby, pp. 297-98.

[27] Bennett, pp. 385-86; Leach, p. 3; Thomas Morton, THE NEW ENGLISH CANAAN (Boston, 1883), p. 138; Williams, pp. 74-75; Willoughby, pp. 297-98; Wood, pp. 100-101.

[28] Gookin, pp. 150-51. According to the account by Champlain, the artichoke, Helianthus tuberosa, was actually cultivated by the Indians; Henry F. Howe, PROLOGUE TO NEW ENGLAND (New York and Toronto, 1943), pp. 72-73. Williams, pp. 120-22; Willoughby, pp. 297-99; Wood, pp. 75-76.

[29] Williams mentions another kind of berry, for which he did not know the name, “... growing in fresh Waters all the Winter, Excellent in conserve against Feavers”. The editor of Williams’ work suggests that perhaps this was the cranberry; Williams, pp. 120-21.

[30] Willoughby, p. 299.

[31] Bennett, pp. 385-86; Frank G. Speck and Ralph W. Dexter, “Utilization of Marine Life by the Wampanoag Indians of Massachusetts,” JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES XXXVIII (Menasha, August 15, 1948), p. 262; Vaughan, p. 30; Willoughby, pp. 297-98; Wood, p. 170.

[32] Wood, p. 170.

[33] Vaughan, p. 30; Williams, pp. 115-16.

[34] Williams, p. 115; Wood, p. 75.

[35] Williams, p. 116.

[36] Ibid., p. 115.

[37] Ibid.

[38] Ibid.

[39] Ibid., pp. 188-193; Vaughan, p. 30; Wood, pp. 98-100.

[40] Ibid.

[41] Williams, pp. 188-193.

[42] Wood, pp. 98-99.

[43] MOURT’S RELATION OR JOURNAL OF THE PLANTATION OF PLYMOUTH (London, 1622), reprinted in Alexander Young, CHRONICLES OF THE PILGRIM FATHERS FROM 1602-1625, Alexander Young, ed. (Boston, 1841), pp. 136-37; Williams, pp. 188-193; Winslow, p. 362; Wood, pp. 98-100.

[44] Wood, pp. 99-100.

[45] MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 136-37.

[46] Wood, pp. 99-100.

[47] Williams, pp. 188-193.

[48] Ibid.

[49] Ibid.

[50] Ibid.

[51] Ibid.; Wood, pp. 99-100.

[52] Williams, pp. 188-193; Winslow, p. 362.

[53] Williams, pp. 188-93.

[54] Ibid., Wood, pp. 99-100.

[55] Williams, pp. 188-93.

[56] Wood, pp. 99-100.

[57] “... it being the custome of the Indians to burne wood in November when the grass is withered, and leaves dryed.”; Wood, p. 17. “The Salvages are accustomed to set fire of the Country in all places where they come, and to burne it twize a yeare, viz. at the Spring and the fall of the leafe”; Morton, p. 172.

[58] Wood, p. 101.

[59] Bradford, I, p. 168; D. S. Byers, “The Environment of the Northeast”, MAN IN NORTHEASTERN NORTH AMERICA, Frederick Johnson, ed. (Andover, 1946), p. 25; Williams, p. 136.

[60] turbot, halibut, plaice, flounder.

[61] resembles a smelt.

[62] Champlain in Howe, pp. 110-115; Gookin, p. 150. It is not really possible to tell which of these fish were in most frequent use; bass seems to be the most mentioned by writers on tribes in the area. Josselyn lists the following as favorites of the Indians: striped bass, sturgeon, salmon, eels and lamphreys and frostfish. Since he does not tell the specific groups he was writing about and since his home was to the north of our area of concern, it is not certain that this list is representative of the preferences of Indians in the Plymouth area; Bennett, pp. 385-86. MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 196, 205; Williams, pp. 136-37, 142; Wood, pp. 100-102.

[63] Byers, p. 26.

[64] Bennett, pp. 385-86.

[65] “Of their fishing, in this trade they be very expert, being experienced in the knowledge of all baites, fitting sundry baites for the severall fishes, and diverse seasons; being not ignorant likewise of the removall of fishes, knowing when to fish in rivers, and when at rocks, when in Baies, and when at seas....”; Wood, p. 100.

[66] Champlain in Howe, pp. 110-115; Wood, pp. 100-101, 107.

[67] Champlain in Howe, pp. 110-115; Wood, p. 107.

[68] Wood, p. 107.

[69] Williams, p. 142; Wood, pp. 100-101.

[70] Wood, pp. 100-102.

[71] Williams, p. 137.

[72] MOURT’S RELATION, p. 205. One technique, found among the 19th century descendants of the Wampanoags, was: “Fish wiers were built in shallow water with nets having notched stone sinkers tied to them for anchorage.”; Speck and Dexter, p. 264.

[73] Williams, p. 137.

[74] Wood, pp. 100-101.

[75] MOURT’S RELATION, p. 196.

[76] Bradford, I, p. 162. There is no information as to the role of the dog in Wampanoag culture.

[77] Wood, p. 94.

[78] MOURT’S RELATION, p. 133; Willoughby, p. 296.

[79] Martin Pring’s Narrative in Howe, pp. 72-73.

[80] Ibid.; Willoughby, p. 296.

[81] Williams, p. 123; Wood, p. 106.

[82] Williams, p. 114.

[83] Ibid., p. 117.

[84] Willoughby, pp. 297-98.

[85] Wood, p. 106.

[86] Champlain in Howe, p. 130.

[87] Ibid. Early observers were impressed with the agricultural skill of the Indians and characterized them as being mainly dependent for their livelihood upon the corn they grew. Speaking from a present-day vantage point, with considerably more information at hand about the practices of primitive horticulturalists, one must be more cautious about drawing such a conclusion. In regard to the amount of corn produced, Williams says: “The woman of the family will commonly raise two or three heaps of twelve, fifteene, or twentie bushells a heap ... and if she have the helpe of her children or friends, much more.” (p. 124). Presumably the size of the fields on which this was grown averaged out to about an acre per family. The Pilgrims were able to get corn from the Indians in order to survive their initial hardships. Later they tell of obtaining rather large amounts of corn from the Indians along the coast to take north to trade (Willoughby, pp. 297-98). However, before assuming that agriculture was the major food source for the Wampanoags, it should be remembered that these Indians and their neighbors were best known to the early chroniclers in their coastal farming settlements. When they were living in the forest during hunting season and in the winter villages they were probably seldom seen by the Europeans. Therefore, the foreigner’s view of Indian dietary habits may not contain the entire story. The habitual use of acorns and ground nuts as starvation foods indicates that their control of agricultural food supplies was not as yet always dependable. Probably horticulture had come to largely supplant a pattern of summer gathering of vegetable foods and to be ordinarily more productive than the former practice. But without the addition of animal foods, the crops alone probably would not normally have provided enough food to sustain the Indians.

[88] Williams, p. 136; Willoughby, p. 299; Wood, p. 107.

[89] Wood, p. 107.

[90] Ibid. Meat was probably dried in the same way, but the only mention of this is smoke-dried moose’s tongue (a delicacy); Willoughby, p. 299.

[91] Wood, p. 107.

[92] Morton, p. 160; Williams, p. 120.

[93] MOURT’S RELATION, p. 133.

[94] Ibid.; p. 141. Champlain notes that the depth of these holes was “some five or six feet,” and that they were mounded up three or four feet; Howe, p. 133. Morton, p. 160, notes the capacity of these storage pits as being a “hogshead” apiece. Williams, pp. 120-22.

[95] Wood, p. 106.

[96] Ibid., p. 107; Williams, p. 136.

[97] Wood, p. 75; Gookin, pp. 150-151.

[98] “Their spits are no other than cloven sticks sharped at one end to thrust into the ground; onto these cloven sticks they thrust the flesh or fish they would have rosted, behemming a round fire with a dozen of spits at a time, turning them as they see occasion.”; Wood, p. 75.

[99] Gookin, p. 150.

[100] Ibid.

[101] Williams, p. 136.

[102] Ibid.

[103] Gookin, pp. 150-51; Williams, p. 40; Wood, p. 76.

[104] D. Bushnell, Jr., “The Sloane Collection in the British Museum,” AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, ns., VIII (1906), p. 675.

[105] Gookin, p. 150; Williams, p. 40.

[106] Gookin, pp. 150-51; Williams, p. 40; Wood, p. 76.

[107] Williams, p. 40.

[108] Ibid., pp. 120-22; Gookin, pp. 150-51.

[109] Williams, p. 122.

[110] Ibid., p. 121.

[111] Ibid., p. 120.

[112] Ibid.; no description of the process is given.

[113] Including snakes. John Brereton’s narrative in SAILORS NARRATIVES OF VOYAGES ALONG THE NEW ENGLAND COAST 1524-1624, George Parker Winship, ed. (Boston, 1905), p. 50.

[114] This is the conclusion reached by Bennett after a study of the subject, and the current writer could not find reference to its use by Indians of the area either; Bennett, p. 384.

[115] Bennett estimates that 65% of the caloric intake was provided by corn; Ibid., p. 394.

[116] Wood, pp. 75-76.

[117] Ibid., p. 77; Williams, p. 136.

[118] Williams, p. 120.

[119] Martin Pring, “The Voyage of Martin Pring” in SAILORS NARRATIVES—, George Parker Winship, ed. (Boston, 1905), p. 56. This combined with the evidence of periodic scarcity provided by the existence of “starvation foods” and the evidence for large gatherings of people to take fish during their spring runs, suggests that there was a fairly heavy dietary dependence upon fish from early spring until the time the corn ripened.

[120] Morton, p. 137.

[121] Wood, p. 76.

[122] Ibid., pp. 75-76.

[123] Ibid.

[124] Leach, p. 137.

[125] Williams, p. 40; Wood, p. 76.

[126] Morton, p. 137; Wood, p. 77.

[127] Bennett, p. 395.

[128] Ibid.

[129] Williams, pp. 72-73.

[130] Ibid.

[131] Brereton, p. 38.

[132] Williams, pp. 72-73.

[133] Ibid., p. 100.

[134] Ibid., p. 43; The use of tobacco by women is listed by Flannery as a southern New England trait.

[135] Ibid.

[136] Wood, p. 73.

[137] Ibid., p. 101; Williams, p. 145.

[138] Williams, p. 145.

[139] Morton, p. 142; Wood, p. 73.

[140] “... they have likewise another sort of mantles, made of Mose skinnes, which beast is a great large Deere so bigge as a horse; these skinnes they commonly dress bare, and make them wondrous white.”; Morton, pp. 142-43.

[141] Probably the material used for this embroidery was moose hair and/or porcupine quills as was done by the Algonquians living farther north. The information about the style of this decoration is not very extensive: “... in forme like lace set on by a Taylor ... of severall fashions very curious, according to the several fantasies of the workmen, wherein they strive to excell one another....”; Morton, pp. 142-43; Williams, p. 145; Wood, p. 101.

[142] Morton, p. 143.

[143] Gookin, p. 152; Wood, p. 73.

[144] Morton, p. 141.

[145] Ibid., pp. 135-37.

[146] Ibid., p. 143; Williams, p. 40; Willoughby, p. 239; Wood, p. 76.

[147] Some information about items in this category has come to light through archaeology. Where pieces of textile have been buried near metal objects, as was sometimes the case in Indian graves in this region, the metal acted to preserve fragments of the otherwise highly perishable textile industry.

[148] Byers, pp. 16-17; Gookin, p. 151; Willoughby, pp. 233, 244-45, 248.

[149] Wood, pp. 101-102.

[150] One such line was collected by John Winthrop eventually placed in the British Museum. Its length is 13.6 meters; Bushnell, p. 84.

[151] In this case, the line itself was made out of bast fiber; Champlain in Howe, p. 115.

[152] Williams, p. 137.

[153] Wood, p. 102.

[154] Ibid., p. 107; Williams, pp. 65, 133; Willoughby, p. 248.

[155] Willoughby, p. 248.

[156] Gookin, p. 151; Wood, p. 107.

[157] Willoughby, pp. 244-45.

[158] Samuel Champlain’s narrative in SAILOR’S NARRATIVES—, George Parker Winship, ed. (Boston, 1905), p. 90.

[159] Gookin, p. 152; Morton, pp. 142-43.

[160] This is the technique for making similar garments used by other American Indian groups.

[161] Morton, pp. 134-35; Wood, p. 30.

[162] Willoughby, pp. 244-45.

[163] Ibid.; Gookin, p. 152.

[164] Gookin, p. 151; MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 144-45. “From the tree where the bark grows, they make severall sorts of baskets, great and small. Some will hold four bushels, or more: and so downward, to a pint. In their baskets they put their provisions. Some of their baskets are made of rushes; some, of bents; others of maize husks: others, of a kind of silk grass: others of a kind of wild hemp: and some, of barks of trees: many of them very neat and artificial, with the portraitures of birds, beasts, fishes, and flowers upon them in colours.”; Wood, p. 107.

[165] Wood, p. 107.

[166] Willoughby, p. 248.

[167] Ibid.; Gookin, p. 150.

[168] Willoughby, p. 248.

[169] Williams, p. 40.

[170] MOURT’S RELATION, p. 133.

[171] Willoughby, p. 244.

[172] Wood, p. 107.

[173] Ibid.

[174] MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 144-45.

[175] Willoughby, p. 151, illustrates one basket, dating about 1675 and made by the Narragansetts. It is a twined basket; the materials are basswood bark and corn husk, the decoration being in the latter. Red wool yarn also once was part of the decoration, but that has been since destroyed. Designs are worked in light corn husk, which forms part of the weft element. Design form is geometric, non-representational, diagonal steps, horizontal bands, and disconnected square spots. Design field covers the entire side area of the basket, which is tall and narrow in shape. Recalling Gookin’s description of zoomorphic decoration, there is reason to suspect considerable scope to the decorative content of this style.

[176] Brereton, p. 50, writes of them as being four feet long and six inches wide. Pring in Howe, p. 72. Pring, p. 56, says the belts were “sixe foot long” and made of a snake’s skin.

[177] Gookin, p. 152.

[178] Breech clouts worn by women are described as hanging down a little longer in back than those worn by men; Pring in Howe, p. 72; Williams, p. 143.

[179] Williams, p. 143.

[180] Vaughan, pp. 47-48, lists fish oil, eagle and rackoon fat, bear and later pig grease used for this purpose.

[181] The deerskin from which both breech clouts and leggings were made was de-haired; Morton, pp. 142-43. The method of fastening leggings aboriginally is not described. Wood, p. 73, says that they were attached to the belt with buttons, which in post-contact times is not so unlikely, considering that the Indians learned to mould buttons out of pewter. MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 186-87; Winslow, p. 72.

[182] Morton, pp. 142-43; Willoughby, p. 208.

[183] Wood, p. 73.

[184] Pring in Howe, p. 72; MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 186-87; Winslow, p. 365.

[185] Morton, p. 144.

[186] Ibid., pp. 142-43.

[187] Massasoit sometimes wore a mantle of black wolf skin; Altham, p. 30; Gookin, p. 152; Wood, p. 73.

[188] Morton, p. 144.

[189] Champlain, p. 90.

[190] Twilling is a variety of plaited weaving.

[191] “This fringe is formed of the ends of the warp reinforced with loops of the same material to give additional thickness, all being nicely bound together by a single double woof cord of twined weaving.”; Willoughby, p. 247.

[192] Ibid., p. 280; Pring in Howe, p. 72.

[193] Morton, p. 143.

[194] Materials mentioned for sleeves are otter, fox, and cat fur; Winslow, p. 365 and MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 186-87; Willoughby, p. 247; Wood, p. 73.

[195] MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 186-87.

[196] Morton, pp. 142-43.

[197] Williams, p. 98.

[198] Wood, p. 73.

[199] Rowlandson gives the following description of Indians in 1676 wearing festive attire: “He was dressed in his Holland shirt, with girdles of wampom upon his head and shoulders. She had a kersey coat, covered with girdles of wampom from the loins upward. Her arms from her elbows to her hands were covered with bracelets; theyre were handfuls of necklaces about her neck, and several sorts of jewels in her ears. She had fine red stockings, and white shoes, her hair powered, and her face painted red....”, in S. G. Drake, TRAGEDIES OF THE WILDERNESS (Boston, 1841), pp. 51-52.

[200] Gookin, p. 152.

[201] Ibid. This material came in widths of about a yard and half, and was colored blue, red, purple, and some was used white. About two yards would be used to make a mantle for a man or woman.

[202] Williams, pp. 143-45.

[203] These items also appear archaeologically, but in most cases the dating is imprecise.

[204] All work in copper and brass was done by pounding the soft metal into shape, and cutting was probably done by scoring with a sharpened stone. Metal casting was unknown to the Wampanoags prior to the arrival of European settlers.

[205] Archer’s narrative in Howe, p. 59. A breastplate of this description was excavated in a burial at Fall River, Massachusetts; Willoughby, p. 233.

[206] It is thought, based on excavated remains, that the wood used was elder; Willoughby, pp. 233, 238-39.

[207] A burial was excavated in which a bandolier lay across the copper breastplate, possibly indicating simultaneous wearing; Willoughby, p. 233.

[208] Willoughby, pp. 240-41. These were joined by running a thread through the bead and looping it around two threads running along the ends of the beads; Ibid., p. 233. Stringing material in one case was a 2-ply twisted cord; Ibid., p. 238.

[209] Brereton, pp. 43-44, reported the wearing of this style of necklace simultaneously with a bandolier.

[210] Brereton, p. 43; Archer in Howe, p. 59. A gorget recovered archaeologically was disc-shaped, of sheet brass, with two perforations; Willoughby, pp. 238-39.

[211] A large copper necklace was placed about the neck of an important chief’s daughter in a Rhode Island burial that dates to about 1660; H. H. Wilder, “Notes on the Indians of Southern Massachusetts,” AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, ns. XXV (1923), p. 211.

[212] Wood, p. 74.

[213] Willoughby, p. 265, notes that “... the term Wampum or wampumpeage was usually applied by the New England tribes to the white beads and suckauhock, mowhackees or macheis to the purple variety, both types were generally known to the English as wampum.”

[214] Bradford, II, p. 43.

[215] Altham, p. 30.

[216] Gookin, p. 152; Thomas Lechford, PLAIN DEALING, OR NEWS FROM NEW ENGLAND, J. H. Trumbull, ed. (Boston, 1868), pp. 116-117, describes one such belt as having a checkered design.

[217] Bushnell, p. 674; Lechford, pp. 116-117; Williams, pp. 177-78.

[218] A “belt” of wampum might range in size from one to five or more inches wide; Williams, pp. 177-78. Willoughby, p. 271, cites a contemporary account of wampum belts owned by King Philip: “One of King Philip’s belts, ‘curiously wrought with black and white wampum in various figures and flowers and pictures of many birds and beasts’ was nine inches broad, and when hung about Captain Church’s shoulders reached to his ankles. Philip had two other belts, one with two flags upon the back which hung from his head, the other with a star upon the end which hung from his breast. When Philip visited Boston he wore a coat and leggings, set with wampum ‘in pleasant wild works’ and a broad belt of the same.”

[219] Willoughby, p. 265.

[220] Ibid.; Bushnell, p. 647; Williams, p. 176.

[221] A breastplate, the collar made of wampum and the main body of “shells out of the up country fresh water lakes”, worn on occasion of war and feast, was among the items collected and described by John Winthrop; Bushnell, p. 674.

[222] Willoughby, pp. 271-74.

[223] Ibid., pp. 238-39.

[224] Willoughby, p. 198, describes a group of seeds “resembling those of the Cornus” with the ends ground off preparatory to stringing. These were found archaeologically, associated with European trade beads. MOURT’S RELATION, p. 194, describes Massasoit as wearing a “great chain of white bone beads about his neck”.

[225] Verrazano’s narrative in Howe, p. 15. It is possible that glass trade beads were not very popular among the Wampanoags in the early 17th century. There are 16th century accounts of glass beads given to the Indians by explorers, and glass beads dating to the early 16th century have been in graves in this area, but glass beads are not mentioned as a part of Indian dress by writers of the early colonial period.

[226] Wood, p. 74.

[227] “... in forme of mullets or spur-rowels”; Ibid. Mullet is the same shape as a rowel.

[228] Gookin, p. 153; Rowlandson, pp. 51-52.

[229] Gookin, p. 153; MOURT’S RELATION, p. 194.

[230] Gookin, p. 153; Verrazano in Howe, pp. 15, 59; MOURT’S RELATION, p. 194, mentions painted faces “with crosses, and some other antic works....” This could be actual painting in patterns or a mistaking of tattoos for paint.

[231] Archer in Howe, p. 59; Champlain, p. 91; Gookin, p. 153; MOURT’S RELATION, p. 194; Vaughan, p. 42; Verrazano in Howe, p. 15; Wood, p. 74.

[232] Gookin, p. 153.

[233] Ibid.; Rowlandson, pp. 51-52; Vaughan, p. 42.

[234] Lechford, p. 116.

[235] “Their Virgins are distinguished by a bashfull falling downe of their haire over their eyes.”; Williams, p. 58.

[236] Winslow, p. 364.

[237] “... Their boyes being not permitted to weare their haire long till sixteene years of age, and then they must come to it by degrees....”; Wood, pp. 71-72.

[238] Ibid.

[239] MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 183, 187.

[240] Pring in Howe, p. 72.

[241] Ibid.; Champlain, p. 90; Gookin, p. 153; Lechford, p. 116; Wood, pp. 71-72, gives a description of hairstyles for the Massachusetts. For a youth above sixteen there was a long lock in front, on the crown, and on either side. The rest of the hair was shaved off close to the scalp. A warrior wore his hair long on one side and short on the other.

[242] Gookin, p. 153.

[243] Ibid.; Pring in Howe, p. 72; Lechford, p. 116.

[244] Gookin, p. 153; Archer in Howe, p. 59; MOURT’S RELATION, p. 187.

[245] Lechford, p. 116. An ornamental comb of the same style in brass was recovered archaeologically; Willoughby, pp. 235, 243-44.

[246] Champlain, p. 90.

[247] Ibid., p. 91; Wood, p. 72.

[248] Brereton in Howe, p. 64.

[249] Ibid., p. 105.

[250] Byers, p. 16.

[251] Williams, p. 206.

[252] Gookin, pp. 152-53.

[253] H. M. Chapin, “Indian Implements found in Rhode Island,” Rhode Island Historical Society, COLLECTIONS, XVIII (1924), p. 15, notes that soapstone quarries known to have been used by the Indians are located at Johnstone and Westerly, R.I., and Wood, p. 69, mentions the source of stone pipes as being to the south, among the Narragansetts. Although it is true that copper and brass were early obtained by trade from Europeans, native copper was also available. Byers, p. 5, cites several locations of outcroppings in western Massachusetts and Connecticut. Copper items from at least one site in Massachusetts have been analyzed and found to be of native materials.

[254] These items were probably all available in surface outcroppings, and specialized techniques other than knocking off chunks were unnecessary; Chapin, p. 3.

[255] It is not known whether the Wampanoags made their own clay pots or traded for them. However, explorers reported that there were outcroppings of potting quality clay in Plymouth. Brereton, p. 38, reports that there was clay on Martha’s Vineyard which the Indians there used for making pipes.

[256] Chapin, p. 15.

[257] Ibid.

[258] Wood, pp. 69-70.

[259] Bradford, II, p. 52; Willoughby, pp. 243-44.

[260] Willoughby, pp. 243-44.

[261] Gookin, p. 152.

[262] Champlain in Howe, p. 105; Wood, p. 102.

[263] Champlain in Howe, p. 105; Gookin, p. 152; Willoughby, p. 154; Wood, p. 102.

[264] Champlain in Howe, p. 105.

[265] Ibid.

[266] Willoughby, p. 154.

[267] Champlain in Howe, p. 105; Wood, p. 102.

[268] Champlain in Howe, p. 105.

[269] Once a bowl was thus far completed, it is reported that they would “soak it in their minerall springs to dye it”; Bushnell, p. 675.

[270] Pring, p. 58.

[271] Byers, p. 16.

[272] The weight of even a large version of this canoe (9-passenger) did not exceed 60 pounds; Pring, p. 58.

[273] “... sewing them with a kind of bark....”; Gookin, pp. 152-53. “... sowed together with strong and tough oziers or twigs....”; Pring p. 58.

[274] Ibid.

[275] Gookin, p. 152-53; Wood, p. 102.

[276] Bushnell, p. 675.

[277] Champlain in Howe, pp. 117, 133-34; Morton, pp. 134-35; MOURT’S RELATION, p. 144; Verrazano in Howe, p. 17; Williams, pp. 60-61; Wood, pp. 105-6.

[278] Gookin, pp. 149-50; Vaughan, p. 46; Williams, pp. 60-61.

[279] Williams, pp. 60-61.

[280] Ibid.; Gookin, pp. 149-50; Wood, pp. 105-6.

[281] Vaughan, p. 46.

[282] Ibid.

[283] And it is the type with which the early colonists of Plymouth would have been the most familiar. We have no firsthand accounts of the use of the longhouse by the Wampanoags; however, we do know that it was in use among the Narragansetts and the Massachusetts, which is strong evidence that the Wampanoags, who followed a similar pattern of seasonal settlement had this structure also.

[284] “Two families will live comfortably and lovingly in a little round house of some fourteen or sixteen foot over, and so more and more families in proportion”; Williams, pp. 60-61. However, according to Gookin, they might go up to 40 feet in diameter: “These houses they make of several sizes, according to their activity and ability; some twenty, some forty feet long, and broad.” Gookin, pp. 149-50.

[285] Champlain, p. 117.

[286] MOURT’S RELATION, p. 144; Williams, p. 67.

[287] Morton, pp. 134-35, says that they place the mats of their houses “... leaving severall places for dores, according as the winde sitts.”

[288] Williams, p. 67.

[289] Morton, pp. 134-35.

[290] Their manufacture is discussed more fully in a previous section on textiles.

[291] Williams, p. 67.

[292] Gookin, pp. 149-50.

[293] Ibid.

[294] Williams, p. 61.

[295] Gookin, pp. 149-50; Champlain in Howe, pp. 117, 133-34; Morton, pp. 134-135; MOURT’S RELATION, p. 144.

[296] Wood, pp. 105-6.

[297] Williams, p. 163. The sachem’s house is called by a different name from that of an ordinary dwelling; Winslow, p. 317.

[298] Wood, p. 98.

[299] Williams, p. 189. These would probably have varied considerably depending on whether it was a single hunter or two that was being housed or whether the whole family made the move. As mentioned earlier, both patterns were followed. Structures housing single hunters could have been mere lean-to’s or something like the bark wickiup used to the north. When a family was living in the hunting camp, there would have been women to carry up the mats, and the house was probably more elaborate; it may have been built in the usual hemispherical plan.

[300] Rowlandson, p. 50; Williams, p. 194.

[301] Williams, pp. 60-61, 114.

[302] Ibid., pp. 211-12; E. L. Butler, “Sweat Houses in the Southern New England Area,” BULLETIN OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, VII (October, 1945), p. 12.

[303] Williams, pp. 60-61; Willoughby, pp. 244-45. “Embroidery” might also refer to designs that were woven into the mats.

[304] Gookin, p. 150.

[305] Ibid.; Morton, pp. 135-37.

[306] Gookin, p. 150; Champlain in Howe, pp. 133-34; Morton, pp. 135-37.

[307] Gookin, p. 150; Morton, pp. 135-37. Kinds of skins mentioned for this purpose are: deer, bear, otter, beaver, racoon.

[308] Gookin, p. 151.

[309] Ibid.; Wood, p. 75.

[310] MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 144-45; Williams, p. 65.

[311] Gookin, p. 151; MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 144-45.

[312] Morton, pp. 135-37.

[313] Ibid.

[314] MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 144-45; Willoughby, 292.

[315] Morton, pp. 135-37.

[316] “... we found also two or three deer’s heads, one whereof had been newly killed, for it was still fresh. There was also a company of deer’s feet stuck up in the house, hart’s horns, and eagles’ claws, and sundry such like things there was; also two or three baskets full of parched acorns, pieces of fish, and a piece of a broiled herring”; MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 144-45. Willoughby, p. 248.

[317] Champlain in Howe, pp. 112, 133; Rowlandson, pp. 46-47, has wives occupying separate households, where there are multiple wives.

[318] Champlain in Howe, pp. 172-73.

[319] Ibid., p. 112.

[320] Wood, p. 106.

[321] Williams, pp. 74-75.

[322] When Plimoth Plantation was established there were no Indians settlements in its immediate neighborhood. The former village of Patuxet, once located on the site of Plymouth and said to have had a population of two thousand, was wiped out by the plague prior to the settlement of Europeans. Altham, p. 29, reports that the nearest Indian settlement to Plymouth was called Manomet and was fourteen miles away. This is probably identical with the town of Mannamit, described by Chase as being in Sandwich, near the bottom of Buzzard’s Bay; H. E. Chase, “Notes on the Wampanoag Indians,” SMITHSONIAN ANNUAL REPORT, 1883 (Washington, 1885), p. 888.

[323] If, as reports indicate, twelve to twenty men went out from each summer village in the fall to their hunting camps, and it may be assumed that these represent most of all the able-bodied adult male population, then we would seem to be dealing with summer village populations whose total numbers would equal in size the population of a winter longhouse. It might further be surmised that the personnel of each are identical; in other words, the same group of 40 to 50 people may have formed a camping-together unit for most of the year, living together in the same longhouse in winter and camping near each other as a summer village.

[324] Wood, pp. 100-101.

[325] “... a bundle of Indian candles or splints of the pitch tree”; Bushnell, p. 675. Willoughby, p. 294.

[326] Brereton in Howe, pp. 63-64; John Josselyn, “An account of Two Voyages to New England,” Massachusetts Historical Society COLLECTIONS, Ser. 3, III, (Boston, 1883), p. 257; Morton, p. 172; Williams, p. 100.

[327] Williams, pp. 57, 87.

[328] Winslow, p. 367.

[329] Gookin, p. 153.

[330] Williams, p. 153, estimates the value of each gift as about “... eighteen pence, two Shillings, or thereabouts....”

[331] Ibid.; Rowlandson, p. 50.

[332] Chase, p. 900; Morton, pp. 141, 158-59; Williams, pp. 174-75.

[333] Morton, pp. 158-59; Williams, pp. 174-75.

[334] Chase, p. 900.

[335] Williams, pp. 174-75.

[336] Morton, p. 141.

[337] Ibid., pp. 158-59.

[338] Williams, p. 173; Wood, p. 69.

[339] Willoughby, p. 266.

[340] Ibid., pp. 266-67.

[341] Bradford, II, pp. 43-44.

[342] Willoughby, pp. 270-71.

[343] Morton, p. 157.

[344] Willoughby, p. 270.

[345] Morton, p. 157.

[346] Willoughby, p. 267.

[347] Gookin, p. 151; Williams, pp. 66, 75; Winslow, p. 363.

[348] Winslow, p. 363; Williams, p. 66.

[349] Winslow, p. 363; Wood, p. 105.

[350] Wood, p. 105.

[351] Williams, p. 66.

[352] Winslow, p. 364.

[353] Ibid., p. 363; Willoughby, p. 132.

[354] Vaughan, pp. 49-50.

[355] Gookin, p. 151; Williams, pp. 32, 132; Williams, p. 75.

[356] Williams, p. 123.

[357] Ibid.

[358] Willoughby, p. 132.

[359] Ibid., pp. 282-83; Byers, pp. 22-23; Morton, p. 172.

[360] Williams, p. 98.

[361] Ibid., pp. 97-98.

[362] Morton, p. 144.

[363] Gookin, pp. 152-53.

[364] Ibid., Williams, p. 134; Wood, p. 102.

[365] Wood, p. 102.

[366] Ibid.; Pring, p. 58.

[367] Williams, p. 134.

[368] Wood says that this is so that a player would not know who to blame for any injury he might receive on the playing field.

[369] Williams, p. 196; Wood, pp. 83, 96-98.

[370] “... their swimming is not after our English fashion of spread armes and legges which they hold too tiresome, but like dogges their armes before them cutting through the liquids with their right shoulder; in this manner they swim very swift and farre....”; Wood, pp. 97-98.

[371] Ibid.

[372] Ibid., pp. 95-96.

[373] “The bones being all blacke or white make a double game; if three be of a colour and two of another, then they afford but a single game; foure of a colour and one differing is nothing; so long as a man wins, he keepes the Tray; but if he loose, the next man takes it”; Ibid.

[374] Ibid., Williams, p. 194.

[375] Winslow, p. 307; Wood, pp. 83, 95-96.

[376] Williams, p. 194.

[377] Ibid., p. 196; Winslow, p. 307; Wood, p. 83.

[378] Williams, p. 197. The Europeans whose writings provide most of the information about Wampanoag culture thought such gatherings were occasions for communion with the devil, and most feared to attend and risk being corrupted. Therefore, information is scarce as to the purpose and form of “ceremonial” activities.

[379] Elliot, p. 81; Morton, p. 138.

[380] Williams, p. 151.

[381] Ibid.

[382] Ibid., p. 153.

[383] Ibid., pp. 82-83.

[384] Gookin, p. 153. None of the music has survived, but it seems to have struck Europeans as pleasant sounding. Wood, p. 108, reports that the sound of an Indian woman singing a lullaby was sweet to his ears.

[385] There is one report of the use of a kettle to beat on as a drum during a dance, but there is no indication of aboriginal use or manufacture of drums; Rowlandson, pp. 48-50. Williams, p. 57.

[386] Eight in one case.

[387] It is not known whether all personal property was buried with the owner or whether some was inherited by friends or relatives.

[388] Lands were allotted upon request for planting, and hunting territories were probably granted in a similar way. Both individuals and some form of “family” are mentioned as receiving such lands; Vaughan, pp. 33-34, 105; Williams, pp. 120, 188-93.

[389] Williams, pp. 188-93; Winslow, pp. 316-62.

[390] Vaughan, p. 54.

[391] There is no information to be gained from early accounts as to what further subdivisions of territory were made or the basis for them. One could speculate that some aspect of land tenure was based on the “winter villages”—that is, a certain territory may have been allotted to the band of co-residence groups who dwelt in adjacent longhouses during the winter.

[392] Occasional unification of the group under a strong leader implies that there were also occasions when it was not so unified, meaning that centralized authority for all Wampanoags as a body was not institutionalized.

[393] Winslow, pp. 360-61.

[394] During the early years of European settlement at Plymouth a sachem called Corbitant was dissatisfied with Massasoit’s friendship with the settlers and plotted to overthrow him.

[395] Winslow, pp. 360-61; Wood, p. 89.

[396] Eliot, p. 139; Gookin, p. 154.

[397] Winslow, pp. 360-61.

[398] Ibid.; Altham, p. 29; Morton, p. 154.

[399] Winslow, pp. 361-62.

[400] Wood, p. 90.

[401] Winslow, p. 362.

[402] Gookin, p. 154; Williams, p. 164; Wood, p. 90.

[403] Winslow, pp. 288, 359-60.

[404] Morton, p. 149; Williams, pp. 152-53.

[405] Ibid.

[406] Possibly the “winter village band” was the group over which this official exercised authority.

[407] Williams, p. 164.

[408] Winslow, pp. 307-8.

[409] Ibid., pp. 364-65; Williams, p. 166.

[410] Winslow, pp. 307-8.

[411] Ibid., p. 168.

[412] Gookin, p. 149.

[413] Williams, p. 102.

[414] Ibid.

[415] Winslow, pp. 364-65; Wood, p. 90.

[416] Williams, p. 57.

[417] Gookin, p. 149.

[418] Winslow, p. 291; Wood, p. 90.

[419] Winslow, pp. 364-65.

[420] Williams, p. 166.

[421] Winslow, pp. 364-65.

[422] Morton, pp. 153-54.

[423] Williams, p. 102; Winslow, pp. 307-8.

[424] Williams, pp. 58, 68; Winslow, pp. 360-61.

[425] Morton, pp. 170-71. What European observers saw as a “royal family” was probably a chiefly clan or lineage.

[426] Wood, p. 74.

[427] Williams, p. 163.

[428] Ibid., p. 178.

[429] Massasoit is said to have had five wives; Altham, p. 29; Wood, p. 91.

[430] Williams, p. 68.

[431] Wood, pp. 77-78.

[432] Ibid.; Williams, pp. 45-46.

[433] Morton, p. 137; Williams, pp. 45-46.

[434] Morton, p. 137; Williams, p. 47.

[435] Wood, pp. 77-78.

[436] Altham, p. 29; Williams, p. 36; Wood, pp. 78-79.

[437] Wood, p. 77.

[438] Winslow, pp. 304-5.

[439] In one case the gift presented was a basket of tobacco and some beads; Ibid., p. 307.

[440] Wood, p. 91.

[441] Williams, p. 169.

[442] Ibid.

[443] Gookin, p. 149; Winslow, p. 364.

[444] Winslow, p. 364.

[445] Ibid.; Williams, p. 168; Wood, p. 91.

[446] Winslow, p. 364.

[447] Gookin, p. 149; Rowlandson, pp. 45-47.

[448] Ibid.; Wood, p. 91.

[449] Thus enhancing wealth and in turn the possibilities for displays of generosity.

[450] Williams, pp. 168-69. This practice is fairly common among pre-literate peoples on a world-wide basis. The reason usually given is the fear that should the mother conceive again before the child is weaned, her milk would dry up.

[451] Ibid., p. 34.

[452] Ibid, pp. 170-71; Morton, pp. 145-46; Winslow, p. 358.

[453] Williams, p. 170.

[454] Winslow, p. 358; Wood, p. 108.

[455] Wood, p. 108.

[456] Ibid.; Morton, p. 147.

[457] Wood, p. 108.

[458] Ibid.

[459] Gookin, p. 149; Williams, p. 59.

[460] Williams, p. 169.

[461] Wood, p. 98.

[462] Ibid., pp. 97-98.

[463] Issack de Rasieres, letter to Samuel Blommaert, in NARRATIVES OF NEW NETHERLANDS, J. Franklin Jameson, ed. (New York, 1909), pp. 113-14.

[464] Winslow, p. 356.

[465] Morton, p. 145; Thomas Shepard, “The Clear Sun-Shine of the Gospel Breaking Forth upon the Indians in New England”, Massachusetts Historical Society, COLLECTIONS, Ser. 3, IV (Boston, 1834), p. 40.

[466] De Rasieres, pp. 113-14.

[467] Winslow, pp. 363-64.

[468] “... they train up the most forward and likeliest boys, from their childhood, in great hardness, and make them abstain from dainty meat, observing divers orders prescribed, to the end that when they are of age, the devil may appear to them; causing to drink the juice of sentry and other bitter herbs, till they cast, which they must disgorge into the platter, and drink again and again, till at length through the extraordinary oppressing of nature, it will seem to be all blood; and this the boys will do with eagerness at the first, and so continue till by reason of faintness, they can scarce stand on their legs, and then must go forth into the cold. Also they beat their shins with sticks, and cause them to run through bushes, stumps and brambles to make them hardy and acceptable to the devil, that in time he may appear unto them.”; Ibid., p. 360.

[469] Ibid., pp. 359-60.

[470] Vaughan, pp. 38-39; Willoughby, p. 287; Wood, pp. 94-95.

[471] Willoughby, p. 285 ff., published a collection of important descriptions of fortifications for the entire New England area.

[472] Williams, p. 99.

[473] Vaughan, p. 39.

[474] Wood, p. 95.

[475] Ibid.

[476] Ibid., p. 89; Vaughan, p. 37; Williams, pp. 201-2.

[477] Rowlandson, pp. 48-49.

[478] Lechford, p. 120; Williams, p. 204; Vaughan, p. 39.

[479] Wood, p. 95.

[480] Williams, p. 204; Vaughan, p. 39.

[481] A skillful conjuror was often called upon to produce such storms; Winslow, p. 366.

[482] Williams, p. 134.

[483] Ibid., pp. 78-80; Wood, p. 95.

[484] Vaughan, pp. 40-41.

[485] Ibid.

[486] Williams, p. 63.

[487] Ibid.

[488] Winslow, pp. 365-66.

[489] Williams, p. 93.

[490] Winslow, pp. 365-66.

[491] Ibid.; Williams, p. 93.

[492] Winslow, pp. 365-66.

[493] There are reports of the use of sweating to alleviate the symptoms of the following: “the French disease”, “plague or smallpox”, “colds, surfeits, sciatica”, “pains fixed in the limbs”; Butler, pp. 12-13; Williams, pp. 211-12.

[494] Gookin, p. 154; Wood, p. 84.

[495] Wood, p. 84.

[496] Frank G. Speck, “Medicine Practices of the Northeastern Algonquians,” PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICANISTS (Paris, 1917), p. 303.

[497] Williams, p. 78. There is not a great deal of specific information on the herbal remedies used by the Wampanoags and their neighbors. Writing of herbal remedies over the entire Northeastern Algonquian area, Speck notes that there is variation from area to area and probably among curers within a single area as to what herb was used for what symptom.

[498] Gookin, p. 154; Mayhew, letter in “The Light Appearing More and More Towards the Perfect Day, etc.”, Henry Whitfield, compiler, Massachusetts Historical Society, COLLECTIONS, Ser. 3 IV (Boston, 1834) p. 202; Williams, pp. 212-13; Winslow, pp. 357-58; Wood, p. 84.

[499] Williams, p. 210; Winslow, pp. 313, 317-18, 362-63.

[500] Williams, pp. 152, 212-13; Winslow, pp. 357-58.

[501] Wood, pp. 92-93.

[502] Mayhew, p. 202; Williams, p. 152; Winslow, pp. 357-58.

[503] Gookin, p. 154.

[504] Ibid.; Mayhew, p. 202; Williams, pp. 212-13; Winslow, pp. 317-18; Wood, pp. 92-93. Gookin says that there were both male and female powows and that they cured both by magic and by herbal means. Williams states that the powows administered nothing in the course of a cure, but proceeded by verbal means only. In none of the reports that recount the actual actions used by the powow is there any mention of the use of herbal cures as part of the process.

[505] Williams, pp. 212-13.

[506] Winslow, pp. 362-63.

[507] Ibid., p. 359.

[508] B. Bassett, “Fabulous Traditions and Customs of the Indians of Martha’s Vineyard,” Massachusetts Historical Society, COLLECTIONS, Ser. 1, I (Boston, 1792), p. 40.

[509] Williams, p. 210.

[510] Wood, pp. 84-85.

[511] Williams, p. 148.

[512] Ibid., pp. 111, 154; Winslow, p. 356; Wood, pp. 105-6. This interpretation of Wampanoag religious philosophy may reflect the bias of European observers conditioned by their own Christian beliefs and the desire to see parallels to them. In actual fact, Wampanoags seem to have had a concept of multiple souls, and the fate of all these was perhaps not the same, considering the fear they had of spirits of all the dead.

[513] Wood, pp. 104-105.

[514] Ibid.; MOURT’S RELATION, pp. 130-33, 142-43; Williams, pp. 216-18; Willoughby, pp. 233, 237-39, 241-42.

[515] Winslow, p. 363.

[516] Williams, pp. 216-18.

[517] Winslow, p. 363; Morton, pp. 169-170.

[518] Willoughby, p. 233.

[519] Williams, pp. 216-18.

[520] Morton, pp. 170-71.

[521] Ibid.; Wood, p. 104.

[522] Williams, p. 214.

[523] Wood, p. 104.

[524] Morton, p. 133; Winslow, p. 363.

[525] Williams, pp. 216-18. It is likely that considerable of this display was less of what we would call “grief” than an attempt to convince the spirit of the deceased not to linger and trouble those who were close to him in life. Malevolence on the part of spirits of the dead is a typical northern Algonquian pattern, and abandoning the house to trick the spirit of a dead relative is a very common practice in primitive groups throughout the world.

[526] Morton, pp. 170-71; Williams, pp. 71, 214-15; Winslow, p. 362; Wood, p. 104.

[527] Williams, pp. 214-15.

[528] Winslow, p. 363.

[529] Morton, p. 133; Wood, p. 104.

[530] Morton, p. 133; Williams, pp. 35, 216.

[531] Williams, pp. 214-15.

[532] Ibid., p. 34.

[533] John Elliot and Thomas Mayhew, “Tears of Repentance, etc.,” Massachusetts Historical Society, COLLECTIONS, Ser. 3, IV (Boston, 1834) p. 202.

[534] Williams, pp. 82, 150.

[535] Ibid., pp. 114, 128; John Elliot, “The Day Breaking, if not the Sun Rising of the Gospell with the Indians of New England,” Massachusetts Historical Society, COLLECTIONS, Ser. 3, IV (Boston, 1834), p. 19; Elliot and Mayhew, pp. 186, 202; Winslow, pp. 357-58.

[536] Elliot, “The Day Breaking—,” pp. 16, 19; Mayhew and Elliot, p. 186; Williams, pp. 48-49, 154.

[537] Williams, pp. 149-50.

[538] Elliot and Mayhew, p. 202.

[539] Ibid., pp. 186, 202; Williams, p. 152; Winslow, pp. 357-58.

[540] Williams, pp. 114, 128.

[541] Elliot and Mayhew, p. 202.

[542] Morton, pp. 167-68, Williams, pp. 114, 148-49; Winslow, pp. 355-56.

[543] Williams, p. 111.

[544] Winslow, pp. 355-56; Wood, p. 86.

[545] Williams, pp. 157-58; Winslow, pp. 355-56. Morton, pp. 167-68, also recounts a creation story, in which the people so anger Kiehtan that he destroys all that are evil in a flood. Morton’s version sounds like a re-make of the flood story in Genesis. However, a common tale in North American Indian mythology involves the existence of the world in some other state, its destruction and subsequent transformation into its present form. It is impossible to tell from the evidence at hand the extent to which the story’s aboriginal content has been altered through contact with Christian mythology.

[546] Williams, p. 114.

[547] Ibid., p. 148-49; Winslow, pp. 355-56.

[548] Williams, pp. 148-49.

[549] Ibid., p. 151; Winslow, pp. 355-58; Wood, p. 92.

[550] Williams, p. 94.

[551] Ibid, p. 151; Gookin, p. 153; Winslow, pp. 355-56.

[552] Winslow, p. 358-59.

[553] Ibid.

[554] Wood, p. 92.

[555] Williams, pp. 48-49.

[556] Ibid., pp. 34-35.

[557] Ibid.

[558] Ibid., p. 152.

[559] Ibid., pp. 152, 212-13; Winslow, pp. 357-58.

[560] Elliot, “The Day Breaking—,” pp. 19-20.

[561] Morton, pp. 150-52; Winslow, p. 366; Wood, pp. 92-93.

[562] Some of the historical sources and the example of other Algonquian groups suggest that this power varied in its nature from one powow to another, depending upon the kind of spirit which gave it, thus the abilities of powows would vary accordingly as to what sorts of things they were able to do. This in turn was displayed in various individualized types of tricks.

[563] Elliot “The Day Breaking—,” pp. 19-20; Elliot and Mayhew, p. 186. As far as can be ascertained, the role of the powow was not formally hereditary. In practice the office probably remained closely tied to certain families, if only because association and heredity stimulated the appropriate dreams in the offspring of those who were powows.

AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF
ETHNOGRAPHIC MATERIALS FOR THE
PLYMOUTH AREA

1. Allen, Z. NATIVE INDIANS OF AMERICA (Providence, 1881).

Quotes standard primary sources and portrays the Indian as the “first settler” in the New World; nothing new is presented in the way of ethnographic data.

2. Altham, Emmanuel, “Emmanuel Altham to Sir Edward Altham, March 1623/1624; Emmanuel Altham to James Sherley, May, 1624,” letters in James, THREE VISITORS, etc.

Relevant information not extensive; concerns general appearance, polygyny, distribution of Indian settlements in Plymouth region, Massasoit, and Indian guests and their dances on the occasion of Bradford’s wedding.

3. Anonymous, “A Description of Mashpee,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 2, Vol. III, 1846.

A 1767 account of general census and welfare information.

4. Anonymous, “Saconet Indians,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 1, Vol. X, 1809.

18th century population records; no ethnographic information.

5. Archer, Gabriel, Archer’s Narrative of the Gosnold Voyage: (information may be found in H. Howe, PROLOGUE TO NEW ENGLAND).

Contains a brief description of the general appearance of the Nausett Indians in the second year of the 17th. century.

6. Bacon, O. N., A HISTORY OF NATICK (Boston, 1856).

Mentions the historical context of the praying town; no ethnographic information.

7. Badger, Rev. Stephen, “Historical and Characteristic Traits of the American Indians in General and those of the Natick in Particular,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 1, Vol. V, 1835.

A report on the condition of the Indians around Natick in 1797.

8. Bartlett, J. R., ed. “Letters of Roger Williams,” PUBLICATIONS OF THE NARRAGANSETT CLUB, VI, 1874.

The main relevance of these documents is Anglo-Indian relationships.

9. Bassett, B., “Fabulous Traditions and Customs of the Indians of Martha’s Vineyard,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 1, 1792, pp. 139-40.

Contains information on 17th. century curing ritual.

10. Bennett, M. K., “The Food Economy of the New England Indians, 1605-1675,” THE JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, Vol. LXIII, No. 55 (October, 1955) pp. 369-395.

This paper represents an attempt to work out the daily food intake of Indians in southeastern New England in the period 1605-1675. The information for the 17th. century comes from the standard sources—Williams, Morton, Winslow, etc. The attempt at quantification in the absence of much quantitative data of any kind to work from is interesting. Whether or not it is valid may be open to question—probably the guess of an expert is better than anyone else’s.

11. Bradford, William, HISTORY OF PLYMOUTH PLANTATION 1620-1647 (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co. for the Massachusetts Historical Society), 1912.

A basic source; data mainly on appearance, food quest, the introduction of wampum, and diplomacy.

12. Brereton, John, Narrative of the Gosnold Voyage (in Winship, SAILORS’ NARRATIVES, also Howe, Prologue to New England).

Relevant information concerns the Nausett, Wampanoag, and probably Narragansett; data on pipes, tobacco, use of copper, use of snakes, fire-making, cordage, and location of clay. Voyage made in 1602.

13. Bushnell, D. Jr., “The Sloane Collection in the British Museum,” AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, ns., Vol. 8, 1906, pp. 671-685.

This describes a series of Indian artifacts collected and sent back to England in the 17th. century; provides some basic data on technology that is not present in other sources.

14. Butler, E. L., “Sweathouses in the Southern New England Area,” BULLETIN OF THE MASSACHUSETTS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, Vol. VII, (October, 1945) pp. 11-15.

Tabulation of the information, of which there is not a great deal for southern New England, on sweat houses and sweating procedure; also talks about New York and northern New England for comparison.

15. Byers, D. S., “The Environment of the Northeast,” in “Man in Northeastern North America,” Frederick Johnson, ed., PAPERS OF THE ROBERT S. PEABODY FOUNDATION FOR ARCHAEOLOGY, Vol. III (Andover: Philips Academy) 1946.

General outline of the environment; information on distribution of basic materials and animals used by the Indians.

16. de Champlain, Samuel, Narratives (in Winship, SAILORS’ NARRATIVES, & Howe, PROLOGUE TO NEW ENGLAND)

——also see VOYAGES OF SAMUEL DE CHAMPLAIN 1604-1618, W. L. Grant, ed. ORIGINAL NARRATIVES OF EARLY AMERICAN HISTORY (New York; Charles Scribner’s Sons) 1970

——and THE WORKS OF SAMUEL DE CHAMPLAIN, Vol. I, H. R. Biggar, ed. (Toronto) 1922

——and others.

Narrative of visits to the New England coast in the first decade of the 17th. century. Relevant information concerns Nausetts and Wampanoags—horticulture, food storage, clothing, textiles, housing, settlement pattern, general appearance, weapons, living conditions, and dugout canoes.

17. Chapin, H.M., “Indian Implements found in Rhode Island,” RHODE ISLAND HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS, Vol. XVIII, 1924-25.

A fairly good range of gadgets is shown; illustrations might be useful. Gives location of some soapstone quarries. No evidence given to support the historic and proto-historic attributions given the artifacts.

18. Chapin, H.M., SACHEMS OF THE NARRAGANSETTS (Providence) 1931.

Historical-biographical data; no ethnographic information.

19. Chase H.E., “Notes on the Wampanoag Indians,” ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION for 1883 (Washington, D.C.: The Smithsonian Institution).

Sort of a general 19th. century population survey, together with notes of the location of sites and towns in the 17th. and 18th. centuries. Quotes the standard sources.

20. Cotton, John, “Vocabulary of the Massachusetts (or Natik) Indians,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 3, Vol. II, 1830, pp. 147-257.

Contains lexical data only; no ethnographic information.

21. Davidson, D.S., “Snowshoes,” AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY MEMOIR #6 (Philadelphia: the American Philosophical Society) 1937.

All inclusive on the subject of snowshoes in North America. This is the only reference there seems to be on the style of snowshoes worn by the Wampanoags.

22. Drake, S.G., CHRONICLES OF THE INDIANS (also called OLD INDIAN CHRONICLE in some editions), (Boston: by the author) 1867.

Accounts of King Philip’s War, presumably written by contemporaries; a chronology of events relating to the Indians. The emphasis is historical rather than ethnographic.

23. Drake, S.G., TRAGEDIES OF THE WILDERNESS (also called INDIAN CAPTIVITIES in later editions), (Boston) 1841.

Contains the account of Mrs. Rowlandson, who was captured by the Wampanoags in the time of King Philip’s War. Evidence of residence patterns of polygynous household; also information as to dress at that time. Probably best to disregard some things (such as diet) as not being typical, since the conditions are not normal—this is a group of Indians moving rather rapidly across the landscape much of the time, living off what they can carry and pick up along the way.

24. Elliot, John, “An Account of Indian Churches in New England in a Letter Written A.D. 1673,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 1, Vol. X, pp. 124-29.

Concerns the requirements of Indians for church membership and their practices as members.

25. Elliot, John “The Day Breaking, if not the Sun Rising of the Gospell with the Indians of New England,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 3, Vol IV, 1834, pp. 1-23.

A good account of how shamans are chosen. Recounts the beginnings of Elliot’s missionary work—attitude toward conversion of the Indians, the things Indians were taught about Christianity, the establishment of praying towns, some of the regulations placed upon the way of life of would-be-converts.

26. Elliot, John, A GRAMMAR OF THE MASSACHUSETTS INDIAN LANGUAGE, new edition (Boston) 1822.

Lexical information; no ethnographic data.

27. Elliot, John, THE INDIAN PRIMER (Edinburgh) 1877.

Compiled for use in teaching reading and catechism to Indians by the 17th century missionary. Contains no ethnographic information.

28. Elliot, John, and Thomas Mayhew, “Tears of Repentance: or, A Further Narrative of the Progress of the Gospel Amongst the Indians in New England,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 3, Vol. IV, 1834.

Letters dating ca. 1653; information concerning aboriginal religious beliefs and the way of becoming a powow.

29. Ellis, G.E., “The Indians of Eastern Massachusetts,” MEMORIAL HISTORY OF BOSTON, J. Winsor, ed., Vol I. (Boston) 1880, pp. 241-71.

Deals with the history of Anglo-Indian relationships. Not much ethnographic information.

30. Flannery, R., AN ANALYSIS OF COASTAL ALGONQUIAN CULTURE (Washington, D. C.; The Catholic University of America Press) 1939.

Trait list for southern New England; very complete, but the inclusion of tribes other than those in the immediate Plymouth region—i.e. Connecticut—calls for cross checking before accepting all things as true of local Indians.

31. Freeman, Frederick, CIVILIZATION AND BARBARISM, (Cambridge: The Riverside Press) 1878.

Running account of relations between Indians and white men from 1620 to the end of King Philip’s War. Ethnographic information is nonexistent; however, a general picture of Indian-English relationships as they unfolded can be gained.

32. Gookin, Daniel, “Historical Collections of the Indians in New England,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 1, Vol I, 1792.

This is a basic source, covering all aspects of Indian culture. Concerns mainly the Massachusetts.

33. Guernsey, S.J., “Notes on the Exploration of Martha’s Vineyard,” AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, ns. Vol. XVIII, 1916, pp. 81-97.

Discusses the investigation of some burials and the collection of some typical artifacts (cord and fabric-impressed and incised sherds).

34. Hawley, G., “Mashpee Indians,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 1, Vol. X, 1809, p. 113.

Contains 18th. century population records.

35. Hawley, Rev. Mr., “Account of an Indian Visitation, A.D. 1698,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 1, Vol. X, 1809, p. 129.

Concerns the location and religious conditions of various Indian congregations of 1698.

36. Haynes, H. W., “Agricultural Implements of the New England Indians,” PROCEEDINGS OF THE BOSTON SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY, Vol. XXII, 1883, pp. 437-43.

Discusses shell and stone hoes and spades that might have been used by the Indians in historic times. Information it contains is better gotten in entirety from original sources than piecemeal here.

37. Higginson, F., “New England’s Plantation,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 1, 1806, pp. 117-24.

Brief ethnographic sketch, dealing with appearance, weapons, houses, seasonal mobility, religion, and labor.

38. Howe, Henry F. PROLOGUE TO NEW ENGLAND (New York, Toronto: Farr and Rinehart, Inc.) 1943.

This book covers the voyages of exploration and the accounts of them from the Vikings to the Pilgrims. The author provides continuity and explanatory passages, but there are extensive quotations from original sources, making this an excellent source for such journalists as Verrazano, Champlain, and Smith; most writings by them relevant to the Indians of this area are included.

39. James, Sydney V., Jr., ed., THREE VISITORS TO EARLY PLYMOUTH (Plimoth Plantation) 1963.

Contains the accounts of John Pory, Emmanuel Altham, and Issack de Rasieres.

40. Josselyn, John, “New England’s Rarities Discovered,” TRANSACTIONS AND COLLECTIONS OF THE AMERICAN ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY, IV., 1860, pp. 130-238.

Main concern is the natural history of the region, but there is a description of the dress (acculturated), ornament, and hairstyle of an “Indian Squa”.

41. Josselyn, John, “Two Voyages to New England,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 3, Vol. III, 1833.

Information on Indian culture not extensive; relevant information covers material for bows and fire-making.

42. Kitteredge, G.L., “Letters of Samuel Lee and Samuell Sewell Relating to New England and the Indians,” PUBLICATIONS OF THE COLONIAL SOCIETY OF MASSACHUSETTS XV, 1912, pp. 142-86.

The letters consist of a series of answers to questions about Indian culture. Unfortunately there is no existing list of the questions. Subjects covered are mainly appearance, matters of health, cures, hygiene, and child care. In many cases the questions asked can be guessed, and the author’s notes as to other primary sources on similar subjects are useful. There is no information not already covered in other standard primary sources, but the information here nicely confirms other writers’ observations. The time of writing is about 1690. The Indian group of main concern is the Narragansett.

43. Knight, M.F., “Wampanoag Indian Tales,” JOURNAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLORE, Vol. XXXVIII, 1925, pp. 134-7.

Information is 19th. and 20th. century; influences of acculturation are obvious.

44. Leach, Douglas Edward, FLINTLOCK AND TOMAHAWK: NEW ENGLAND IN KING PHILIP’S WAR (New York: The Macmillan Company) 1959.

Contains a brief introductory sketch of Indian culture. Population subsistence, houses, physical appearance, division of labor, etc. are treated generally.

45. Lechford, T., PLAIN DEALING OR NEWS FROM NEW ENGLAND, J.H. Trumbull, ed., (Boston: J. K. Wiggin & William Parsons Lunt) 1868.

——also MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 3, Vol. III, 1833.

Originally published in 1642, this work does not contain a great deal of information about Indian culture. Relevant passages concern hairdressing, ornament, fire-making, weapons, and government.

46. Macy, Zaccheus, “A Short Journal of the First Settlement of the Island of Nantucket,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 1, Vol. III, 1794, pp. 155-60.

Description of settlement of the island in 1659 speaks briefly of the Indians as kind and hospitable people. Gives population figures in 1763 (358) prior to an epidemic in the same year that substantially eradicated that population.

47. Miller, W.J., NOTES CONCERNING THE WAMPANOAG TRIBE OF INDIANS (Providence) 1880.

Concerns the history of English dealings with the tribe; no ethnographic data.

48. Mooney, James, “The Aboriginal Population of America North of Mexico,” SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS, Vol. LXXX, no. 7, (February, 1928).

Gives estimate of population for the area. Presumably this is based on historical sources rather than any formula, although he does not say how the figures were arrived at.

49. Mooney, J., “Handbook of American Indians,” BULLETIN OF THE BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY, XXX, Vols. I and II, 1910, pp. 810 (vol. I), 903-4 (vol. II).

For the Wampanoag there is a brief description concerning matters of history, linguistics, and population. There is also a list of town names.

50. Morton, Thomas, THE NEW ENGLISH CANAAN, (Boston: The Prince Society) 1883.

This work, originally published in 1637, is a basic source for the study of both early colonists and Indians; covers all aspects of Indian culture. The tribe being described is the Massachusett.

51. MOURT’S RELATION (in Young CHRONICLES OF THE PILGRIM FATHERS, etc.)

Originally published in 1622, this is a basic source for Wampanoag culture in all aspects; also contains the accounts of earliest Pilgrim dealings with the Indians.

52. Murdock, George Peter, ETHNOGRAPHIC BIBLIOGRAPHY OF NORTH AMERICA, 2nd. Edition (New Haven: Human Relations Area Files) 1953.

Contains a list of all published sources on North American Indians through 1953. All sources that are relevant to the Plymouth area are included in the present list.

53. Pory, John, JOHN PORY’S LOST DESCRIPTION OF PLYMOUTH (Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Company) 1918.

——also in James, THREE VISITORS, etc.

Description of Indians is brief and relates mostly to interrelationships with English—trade, hostilities, etc. What comments there are on culture also pertain to Indians outside the Plymouth area; no information is included that is not gotten better from other sources.

54. Potter, E.R., “Early History of Narragansetts,” COLLECTIONS OF THE RHODE ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY, Vol. III (Providence: Marshall Brown, and Company) 1835.

A compilation of historical data on the Narragansetts. The main ethnographic source is Williams. There is considerable data on Indian-colonial dealings from town records.

55. Prince, J.D., “The Last Living Echoes of the Natick,” AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, ns., Vol. IX, 1907, pp. 493-98.

Concerns a few remaining Indians during the early 20th. century, living in Mashpee on Cape Cod; the recollections of old people. There is also some collected vocabulary.

56. Pring, Martin, “The Voyage of Martin Pring,” (in Winship) SAILORS’ NARRATIVES also Howe, PROLOGUE TO NEW ENGLAND.

Account by an early (1603) visitor to Plymouth harbor. Information on general appearance, horticulture, diet, weapons, and birch bark canoes.

57. Rainey, F.G., “A Compilation of Historical Data Contributing to the Ethnography of Connecticut and Southern New England Indians,” BULLETIN OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CONNECTICUT (April, 1936).

This is just what the title implies—a collection of some data on Indians in southeastern New England. The author assumes that all groups are the same culture-wise, and makes no attempt to segregate data, for example, of observers in Maine from that of those in Connecticut. The compilation, moreover, is incomplete. No synthesis is attempted—information presented in a series of quotations.

58. de Rasieres, Issack, “Letter of Issack de Rasieres to Samuel Blommaert, 1628,” in James, THREE VISITORS, etc., and also Jameson, Franklin, J., ed., NARRATIVES OF NEW NETHERLAND (New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1909).

Information concerning trade with Maine, conduct of the Indians, education of the young, and male initiation. Also extensive account of customs of New York Indians.

59. Shepard, Thomas, “The Clear Sun-Shine of the Gospel Breaking forth upon the Indians in New England,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 3, Vol. IV, pp. 27-67.

Mainly a description of missionary activities, dating to about 1648. There is little ethnographic information; mainly it tells of the efforts of religious instruction. Mentions the existence of female initiation.

60. Smith, John, A DESCRIPTION OF NEW ENGLAND, OR OBSERVATIONS AND DISCOVERIES IN THE NORTH OF AMERICA IN THE YEAR OF OUR LORD 1614 (Boston: Williams Veazie) 1875.

Information on Indians is not extensive. Concerns general distribution of settlements, location of furs, and horticulture around Massachusetts Bay.

61. Speck, F.G., “Medicine Practices of the Northeastern Algonquians,” INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICANISTS, XIX, 1917, pp. 303-21.

Ethnographic information concerns Montagnais, Mohegan, Penobscott—mostly remedy lists, which, since they tend to be specific at least to tribe are not much help except as illustrations of the kinds of things used in the general area. Theory contained therein is relevant to all Algonquians, however, and should be read by anyone studying in this area.

62. Speck, F.G., “Mythology of the Wampanoag,” EL PALACIO, Vol. XXV, 1928, pp. 83-6.

Acculturated, 19th. century information.

63. Speck, F.G., “Territorial Subdivisions and Boundaries of the Wampanoag, Massachusetts, and Nauset Indians,” INDIAN NOTES AND MONOGRAPHS, no. 44, (Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation).

Data on tribal subdivisions is compiled, and most of it relates to about the time of King Philip’s War. Also genealogical data.

64. Speck, F.G., and Ralph Dexter, “Utilization of Marine Life by the Wampanoag Indians of Massachusetts,” JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, Vol. XXXVIII, 1948, pp. 257-65.

Information in regard to contemporary practices of the Wampanoag of Gay Head, Martha’s Vineyard, on use of sea products for food and other purposes.

65. Tantaquidgeon, G., “Notes on the Gay Head Indians of Massachusetts,” INDIAN NOTES, Vol. 7, no. 1 (Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation) January, 1930.

Concerns 19th. century splint and grass basketry-making; describes some techniques of manufacture.

66. Thatcher, James, HISTORY OF THE TOWN OF PLYMOUTH, FROM ITS FIRST SETTLEMENT IN 1620, TO THE PRESENT TIME: WITH A CONCISE HISTORY OF THE ABORIGINES OF NEW ENGLAND AND THEIR WARS WITH THE ENGLISH, &C. (Boston: Marsh, Capen & Lyon) 1835.

Brief cultural summary includes diet, division of labor, appearance, housing, attitude toward children, effects of strong drink, treatment of captives, and the general character of Indians. For its brevity it is quite complete, albeit non-analytical. Includes history of Indian-Pilgrim contacts. Covers King Philip’s War. Includes Indian anecdotes and sketches of character and activities of some of the more well-known Indians of the 17th. century.

67. Trumbull, J.H., “Natick Dictionary,” BULLETIN OF THE BUREAU OF AMERICAN ETHNOLOGY, XXV, 1903.

Linguistic material. No ethnographic data.

68. Vaughan, Alden T., NEW ENGLAND FRONTIER: PURITANS AND INDIANS 1620-1675 (Boston: Little, Brown and Company) 1965.

This is a history of relations between Indians and colonists, taken from the point of view of the colonists. The section relevant to a study of Wampanoag culture is the introductory chapter on general Algonquian culture for the New England area. A most articulate and applicable summary, it is basic reading for a general background in Indian culture of the region.

69. Verrazano’s Narrative (contained in H. Howe, PROLOGUE TO NEW ENGLAND).

This narrative represents the first account of contact with Algonquians of the Plymouth region—area concerned is Narragansett Bay, date is 1524. Information on general appearance and notation of dwellings that do not fit the expected pattern for wigwam construction.

70. Whitfield, Henry, compiler, “The Light Appearing More and More Towards the Perfect day or, A Farther Discovery of the Present State of the Indians in New England, Concerning the Progresse of the Gospel Amongst Them,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 3, Vol. IV.

Contains letters by John Eliot dating about 1651, with information on becoming a powow, dreams, and the succession of powows.

71. Wilder, H.H., “Notes on the Indians of Southern Massachusetts,” AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, ns., Vol. XXV, 1923, pp. 197-218.

This contains some information on the excavation of burials, plus an attempt at reconstruction of how the face of an Indian might have looked, based upon skeletal features.

72. Williams, Roger, A KEY INTO THE LANGUAGE OF AMERICA: OR AN HELP TO THE LANGUAGE OF THE NATIVES IN THAT PART OF AMERICA, CALLED NEW ENGLAND (Providence: The Narragansett Club) Vol. 1, Ser. 1, 1866.

Originally published in 1643, this is a basic source on all aspects of Indian culture. Concern is mainly with the Narragansetts.

73. Willoughby, C. C., “The Adze and the Ungrooved Axe of the New England Indians,” AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, ns. Vol. IX, 1907, pp. 296-306.

Contains both historic and prehistoric data. Same material is found in Willoughby, 1935. Perhaps useful in separating historic and prehistoric forms.

74. Willoughby, Charles C., ANTIQUITIES OF THE NEW ENGLAND INDIANS (Cambridge: the Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology, Harvard University) 1935.

The area covered here is the entirety of New England, so caution must be exercised in selecting information to avoid bringing in details not applicable to the Plymouth area. The relevant section is that called, “The Later Algonquian Group”. Information covers textiles, wooden dishes, shell beads, and burials and grave goods. The sub-section on “General Culture of the Historic New England Tribes”, has both relevant and irrelevant information—the discussions of wampum and fortifications are worthy of note. The archaeology contained in the rest of the book seems rather out of date, and the conclusions as to the source of copper are wrong. Illustrations that pertain to historic artifacts are worth looking at. This book has the advantage of being the major and last of the author’s works concerning the New England area, and information contained in earlier articles (of which there are several) can be found here.

75. Willoughby, C. C., “Certain Earthworks of Eastern Massachusetts,” AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, ns., Vol. XIII, 1911, pp. 566-76.

The information also appears in Willoughby, 1935, where the author has revised his thinking on the nature of some of the earthworks; that source, therefore is better consulted than this.

76. Willoughby, C. C., “Dress and Ornaments of the New England Indians,” AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, ns., Vol. VII, 1905, pp. 499-508.

All information is covered in Willoughby, 1935.

77. Willoughby, C. C., “Houses and Gardens of the New England Indians,” AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, ns., VIII, 1906, pp. 115-32.

All information covered in Willoughby, 1935.

78. Willoughby, Charles C., “The Wilderness and the Indian,” in COMMONWEALTH HISTORY OF MASSACHUSETTS, Albert Bushnell Hart, ed. (New York: The States History Company) Vol. I, 1927-28, pp. 127-57.

A general summary of New England Indian culture, which is better done in the book by Vaughan.

79. Willoughby, C. C., “Wooden Bowls of the Algonquian Indians,” AMERICAN ANTHROPOLOGIST, ns., Vol. X, 1908, pp. 423-34.

Illustrations are interesting for general types, however, objects relevant to the Plymouth area are also illustrated in Willoughby, 1935.

80. Winship, George Parker, ed., SAILORS’ NARRATIVE OF VOYAGES ALONG THE NEW ENGLAND COAST 1524-1624 (Boston: Houghton, Mifflin & Company) 1905.

This book is a collection of early narratives. Especially relevant are the accounts of Samuel de Champlain, Martin Pring, and John Brereton; all are basic sources.

81. Winslow, Edward, “The Glorious Progress of the Gospel Amongst the Indians in New England,” MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL SOCIETY COLLECTIONS, Series 3, Vol. IV, 1834, pp. 69-99.

Originally compiled in 1649, this contains a letter by Eliot, concerning spring congregations at fishing places.

82. Winslow, Edward, “Good Newes from New England: or A true Relation of things very Remarkable at the Plantation of Plimoth in New-England,” (in Young, CHRONICLES OF THE PILGRIM FATHERS, etc.)

Originally published in 1624, this is one of the basic sources on all aspects of Indian culture; the observations are most insightful.

83. Wood, William, NEW ENGLAND’S PROSPECT, Charles Deane, ed. (Boston: The Prince Society), 1865.

A basic source on all aspects of Indian culture. Concern is mainly with the Massachusett.

84. Young, Alexander, CHRONICLES OF THE PILGRIM FATHERS OF THE COLONY OF PLYMOUTH FROM 1602-1625 (Boston: Charles C. Little and James Brown), 1841.

Contains MOURT’S RELATION and Winslow’s Relation (“Good Newes from New England” etc.).

TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE

Notes 32, 58, 323 and 324 each have two anchors in the text.

Obvious typographical errors and punctuation errors have been corrected after careful comparison with other occurrences within the text and consultation of external sources.

Some hyphens in words have been silently removed, some added, when a predominant preference was found in the original book.

Except for those changes noted below, all misspellings in the text, and inconsistent or archaic usage, have been retained.

Main text:
Pg 1: ‘FORWARD’ replaced by ‘FOREWORD’.
Pg 1: ‘undoubtely much’ replaced by ‘undoubtedly much’.
Pg 2: ‘anthropoligists were’ replaced by ‘anthropologists were’.
Pg 2: the third line ‘valuable sources for scholars undertaking such studies.’ was misplaced and has been deleted. It is placed, correctly, in a later paragraph.
Pg 2: ‘anthropoligists who’ replaced by ‘anthropologists who’.
Pg 2: ‘Altantic Coast’ replaced by ‘Atlantic Coast’.
Pg 2: ‘Massasoit, Hobamock’ replaced by ‘Massasoit, Hobomock’.
Pg 3: ‘from Pautxet was’ replaced by ‘from Patuxet was’.
Pg 3: ‘normal proceedure’ replaced by ‘normal procedure’.
Pg 3: ‘is a phenonmenon’ replaced by ‘is a phenomenon’.
Pg 3: ‘all liklihood’ replaced by ‘all likelihood’.
Pg 3: ‘of the seventheenth’ replaced by ‘of the seventeenth’.
Pg 4: ‘seventeeneh century’ replaced by ‘seventeenth century’.
Pg 4: anchor [20] was missing and has been inserted after ‘bowls and drinking cups.’.
Pg 4: ‘for the maintainence’ replaced by ‘for the maintenance’.
Pg 5: ‘androgenous fish’ replaced by ‘androgynous fish’.
Pg 5: ‘currants, chesnuts’ replaced by ‘currants, chestnuts’.
Pg 6: ‘tred them out’ replaced by ‘tread them out’.
Pg 7: ‘kernals were dried’ replaced by ‘kernels were dried’.
Pg 7: ‘seive to catch’ replaced by ‘sieve to catch’.
Pg 7: ‘bitter tanic acid’ replaced by ‘bitter tannic acid’.
Pg 8: ‘the prefered diet’ replaced by ‘the preferred diet’.
Pg 9: ‘bullrushes, bent grass’ replaced by ‘bulrushes, bent grass’.
Pg 9: ‘arrow quivver’ replaced by ‘arrow quiver’.
Pg 10: ‘was usualy worn’ replaced by ‘was usually worn’.
Pg 10: ‘prefered material’ replaced by ‘preferred material’.
Pg 11: ‘There were undoubtely’ replaced by ‘There were undoubtedly’.
Pg 11: ‘one writer, dying’ replaced by ‘one writer, dyeing’.
Pg 11: ‘otherwise interwined’ replaced by ‘otherwise intertwined’.
Pg 11: ‘Neverless, by’ replaced by ‘Nevertheless, by’.
Pg 12: ‘locally occuring’ replaced by ‘locally occurring’.
Pg 12: ‘similar proceedure’ replaced by ‘similar procedure’.
Pg 12: ‘with rozen from’ replaced by ‘with rosin from’.
Pg 12: ‘Other Manufacturers’ replaced by ‘Other Manufactures’.
Pg 13: ‘part nonexistant’ replaced by ‘part nonexistent’.
Pg 13: ‘AND MAINTAINENCE’ replaced by ‘AND MAINTENANCE’.
Pg 14: ‘virtually nonexistant’ replaced by ‘virtually nonexistent’.
Pg 14, 15, 16: ‘costal’ replaced by ‘coastal’ (seven occurrences).
Pg 14: ‘naturally occuring’ replaced by ‘naturally occurring’.
Pg 14: ‘had occured,’ replaced by ‘had occurred,’.
Pg 16: ‘encumberance on the’ replaced by ‘encumbrance on the’.
Pg 16: ‘for sustainence and’ replaced by ‘for sustenance and’.
Pg 16: ‘wthout using’ replaced by ‘without using’.
Pg 16: ‘for posession of’ replaced by ‘for possession of’.
Pg 16: ‘a solem affair’ replaced by ‘a solemn affair’.
Pg 17: ‘of their possesions’ replaced by ‘of their possessions’.
Pg 17: ‘or propitation of’ replaced by ‘or propitiation of’.
Pg 17: ‘he alloted certain’ replaced by ‘he allotted certain’.
Pg 17: ‘costal promentories’ replaced by ‘coastal promontories’.
Pg 18: anchor [398] was missing and has been inserted after ‘those of his subjects.’.
Pg 18: ‘govermental sphere’ replaced by ‘governmental sphere’.
Pg 18: ‘settling dispututes’ replaced by ‘settling disputes’.
Pg 18: ‘regular proceedure’ replaced by ‘regular procedure’.
Pg 18: ‘special mesengers’ replaced by ‘special messengers’.
Pg 19: ‘as the preceeding’ replaced by ‘as the preceding’.
Pg 19: ‘emmisaries were sent’ replaced by ‘emissaries were sent’.
Pg 19: ‘the doner thus’ replaced by ‘the donor thus’.
Pg 19: ‘The host greatfully’ replaced by ‘The host gratefully’.
Pg 19: ‘solemenized by the’ replaced by ‘solemnized by the’.
Pg 21: ‘on its circumfrence’ replaced by ‘on its circumference’.
Pg 21: ‘and Accouterment’ replaced by ‘and Accoutrement’.
Pg 22: ‘terminated be a dash’ replaced by ‘terminated by a dash’.
Pg 22: ‘both theraputic’ replaced by ‘both therapeutic’.
Pg 22: ‘their therauptic’ replaced by ‘their therapeutic’.
Pg 22: ‘curing proceedure’ replaced by ‘curing procedure’.
Pg 22: ‘division occured’ replaced by ‘division occurred’.
Pg 22: ‘contageous disease’ replaced by ‘contagious disease’.
Pg 22: ‘Hazzards were’ replaced by ‘Hazards were’.
Pg 22: ‘equipmnt of life’ replaced by ‘equipment of life’.
Pg 22: ‘treasurers and put’ replaced by ‘treasures and put’.
Pg 23: ‘death had occured’ replaced by ‘death had occurred’.
Pg 23: ‘of the kind’ replaced by ‘or the kind’.
Pg 23: anchor [359] replaced by [539].
Pg 23: ‘kernal of corn’ replaced by ‘kernel of corn’.
Pg 24: ‘to dispell any’ replaced by ‘to dispel any’.
Pg 26: ‘QUIVVER’ replaced by ‘QUIVER’.
Pg 26: ‘of the quivver’ replaced by ‘of the quiver’.
Pg 26: ‘TOMMAHAWK’ replaced by ‘TOMAHAWK’.
Pg 26: ‘p. 102; p. 58;’ replaced by ‘p. 102; Pring, p. 58;’.

Notes:
No. 6: ‘AND TOMAHAWAK’ replaced by ‘AND TOMAHAWK’.
62: ‘is reperesentative’ replaced by ‘is representative’.
87: ‘their livlihood’ replaced by ‘their livelihood’.
87: ‘costal farming’ replaced by ‘coastal farming’.
87: ‘Probably horiculture’ replaced by ‘Probably horticulture’.
119: ‘a farily heavy’ replaced by ‘a fairly heavy’.
322: ‘village of Pautuxet’ replaced by ‘village of Patuxet’.
326: ‘Bereton in Howe’ replaced by ‘Brereton in Howe’.
391: ‘have been alloted’ replaced by ‘have been allotted’.
445: ‘Wood, 91.’ replaced by ‘Wood, p. 91.’.
493: ‘the sympotms of’ replaced by ‘the symptoms of’.
512: ‘pp. 105-5’ replaced by ‘pp. 105-6’.

Bibliography:
No. 8: ‘main revelance of’ replaced by ‘main relevance of’.
15: ‘FOR ARCHAELOGY’ replaced by ‘FOR ARCHAEOLOGY’.
30: ‘COSTAL ALGONQUIAN’ replaced by ‘COASTAL ALGONQUIAN’.
43: ‘AMERICAN FOLKORE’ replaced by ‘AMERICAN FOLKLORE’.
44: ‘AND TOMAHAWAK’ replaced by ‘AND TOMAHAWK’.
49: ‘history, linquistics’ replaced by ‘history, linguistics’.
57: ‘to seggregate data’ replaced by ‘to segregate data’.
70: ‘Henry Whitfeld’ replaced by ‘Henry Whitfield’.
74: ‘the entirity of’ replaced by ‘the entirety of’.

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE WAMPANOAGS IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™ concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE

PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting the free distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work (or any other work associated in any way with the phrase “Project Gutenberg”), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project Gutenberg™ License available with this file or online at www.gutenberg.org/license.

Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg™ electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property (trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in your possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B. “Project Gutenberg” is a registered trademark. It may only be used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg™ electronic works even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project Gutenberg™ electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (“the Foundation” or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the United States and you are located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project Gutenberg™ mission of promoting free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg™ works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg™ name associated with the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg™ License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any country other than the United States.

1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg™ License must appear prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg™ work (any work on which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” appears, or with which the phrase “Project Gutenberg” is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this eBook.

1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase “Project Gutenberg” associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg™ trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg™ electronic work is posted with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked to the Project Gutenberg™ License for all works posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg™ License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg™.

1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project Gutenberg™ License.

1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other format used in the official version posted on the official Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg™ works unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing access to or distributing Project Gutenberg™ electronic works provided that:

- • You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.”

- • You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg™ License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg™ works.

- • You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of receipt of the work.

- • You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.

1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project Gutenberg™ collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain “Defects,” such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the “Right of Replacement or Refund” described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark, and any other party distributing a Project Gutenberg™ electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone providing copies of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works in accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg™ electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg™ work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg™ work, and (c) any Defect you cause.

Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg™

Project Gutenberg™ is synonymous with the free distribution of electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg™’s goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg™ collection will remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure and permanent future for Project Gutenberg™ and future generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.

Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal Revenue Service. The Foundation’s EIN or federal tax identification number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state’s laws.

The Foundation’s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the Foundation’s website and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact

Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg™ depends upon and cannot survive without widespread public support and donations to carry out its mission of increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations ($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate.

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.

Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg™ electronic works

Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg™ concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project Gutenberg™ eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.

Project Gutenberg™ eBooks are often created from several printed editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

Most people start at our website which has the main PG search facility: www.gutenberg.org.

This website includes information about Project Gutenberg™, including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.

Table of Contents

- THE WAMPANOAGS IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY:
- PREFACE
- FOREWORD

- THE WAMPANOAGS IN THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY An Ethnohistorical Study

- DEMOGRAPHY
- HISTORY AND CULTURE CHANGE
- FOOD QUEST
- DOMESTICATED ANIMALS
- AGRICULTURE
- FOOD PROCESSING
- FOOD CONSUMPTION
- DRINK, DRUGS AND INDULGENCE
- LEATHER, TEXTILES, FABRICS
- CLOTHING
- EXPLOITATIVE ACTIVITIES
- PROCESSING OF BASIC MATERIALS
- STRUCTURES
- EQUIPMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF BUILDINGS
- SETTLEMENT
- ENERGY AND POWER
- COMMUNICATION
- EXCHANGE
- LABOR
- TRAVEL AND TRANSPORT
- RECREATION
- ENTERTAINMENT
- PROPERTY
- TERRITORIAL ORGANIZATION
- GOVERNMENT
- LAW AND JUSTICE
- SOCIAL PROBLEMS
- SOCIAL STRATIFICATION
- INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS
- MARRIAGE AND FAMILY
- REPRODUCTION
- INFANCY AND CHILDHOOD
- EDUCATION
- INITIATION
- MILITARY TECHNOLOGY
- WAR
- IDEAS ABOUT NATURE AND MAN
- SICKNESS
- DEATH
- RELIGIOUS BELIEFS[A]
- RELIGIOUS PRACTICES
- ECCLESIASTICAL ORGANIZATION

- APPENDIX

- Tools and Appliances

- FOOTNOTES

- NOTES

- AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ETHNOGRAPHIC MATERIALS FOR THE PLYMOUTH AREA

- THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE